|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Alright, so I'm going to assume the majority age on this board is between 18 and 26 years old.
That would make you between 4 and 12 years old when good old of Kurt Cobain got himself dead (Courtney or himself, it doesn't matter anyway). So I have to ask.. why care if it didn't effect you the way it would have had you been 25 years old when he died? Hell, weren't a good portion of us just going into grade 7 when this guy died? Nirvana is one of the most over-rated bands of all times. If you want to talk about about the "creators" of grunge, look more towards Alice in Chains and Pearl Jam.. hell, Pearl Jam was a million times better than Nirvana could ever aspire to be. Still though, Heart Shaped Box was a SOLID track... but it's all about Eddy Veddar's lungs than anythign else... now days, they suck, but like 15 years ago they kicked ass!!! |
|
|||
Pearl Jam? Please. They were big the same time Nirvana was, and basically followed in the wake after his death.
And if you want to look at the roots of grunge, take a gander at Green River or The Germs. Hell, Neil Young is considered the grand-daddy of grunge. Nice try though. |
|
|||
every kid who was being stepped on (or felt they were being stepped on) by life identified with nirvana. that's why lots of people have cared.
maybe if you make a habit of underlining & bolding some more sentences in future posts it will add some weight to your arguments. not liking a band doesn't make them overrated. not everyone here was in grade school when he killed himself. it wasn't all that long after i saw them play at the last vancouver concert that he died. |
|
|||
Quote:
This is exactly what I am talking about. No one even for a moment considers these bands to be the definition of grunge, the founders of an entire genre of music. Nirvana made it big. They had some great music, hell, I was a nirvana fan and owned a couple of albums, but they are over rated. |
|
|||
Quote:
Seriously, I never minded your posts in the past but now all you do is blatantly state your opinion without even hinting at the possibility that others have a different one. Nirvana never claimed to start the grunge movement. Anybody who knows even a little bit about the genre knows that Nirvana didn't just INVENT grunge. They did, however, make it popular and become the face of it. Just like Bob Marley did, just like Elvis Presley did, just like The Clash did. Did they start it? No. Did they make it popular and media accessible? Yes. Do we thank them for it? Only when Sunshyne isn't posting. Last edited by tiedye; Apr 08, 07 at 04:19 PM. |
|
|||
Uhhhhhhh, Cobain.....
I did a Nirvana - Nirvana review like 3 years ago. Took me ages to write it...here it is: (entirely made up of cob quotes, you'll get the idea...) Quote:
Last edited by anewlife; Apr 08, 07 at 04:53 PM. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Dude, wtf?
Quote:
I know, Nirvana was not the only band that did this sound and not even the first one, there was Mudhoney, Soundgarden, Alice In Chains and others, and yes, Eddie Vedder might have the better voice than Cobain and the Smashing Pumpkins the better songwriting than Nirvana, but hey, it was Nirvana that had all the commercial success, somethng that bands like the Pixies, Replacements, Screaming Trees, Vaselines, Meat Puppets and Pearl Jam did not achieve at the very beginning. The music biz was kinda dead in the early 90s and someone just had to spice it all up, and yeah, that was Nirvana and none of the others. Cobain made grunge popular, certainly not Pearl Jam... |