|
The Chronical Chill out, spark a jay, and enter the chronical. |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
^^ have you ever heard of more than one scientist researching something??
it's not like marijuana is some mystery thing no one knows about, or something brand new that's just discovered. there have been MANY scientists to do research on the plant. Chance are, they aren't all going to be wrong. weed is a drug, all drugs have bad effects on your health which usually stem from long term use. compared to some drugs, weed is alot safer, but that doesn't mean it's not going to do any damage to your body. |
|
|||
there hounsetly is not much accuriate infomation avaliable to the public , im not saying there is no bad side affects that come with weed im just saying its not as bad as some people make it to be
ie 5 joints does not do the same amount of dammage as 115 ciggerettes. |
|
|||
im not going to sit here and talk bullshit , ive probbly done more research on marijuana then probbly anybody here and I know most of the marijuana knowlege is not true , dont belive me?
do some research yourself and see how consestaint the information is your going to find that its not consestaint so how accurate can the information be if its all differant. how many people here have heard about how many cigeretts one joint is worth? |
|
|||
i'd like to know how exactly you know most of the marijuana info out there is false. do you do your own research on marijuana? are you a scientist?
yes, they can be wrong, but they aren't all going to be wrong about everything. the whole how many cigarettes is equal to one joint is always going to be changing. for one, all joints are not the same size. and what are we measuring here? the overall damage you get from one joint, and how many cigarettes it takes to equal that damage? or how much tar is in one joint, and how many cigarettes does it take to produce that same amount? unless your more specific about the cigarette:joint thing then the info is always going to be changing! |
|
|||
you do your own scientific research on marijuana? (that's what i meant, anyone can just research something)
and i know, anyone can see the inconsistancies. i think just think some of them could be due to lack of background info (like the whole cigarette:joint thing). not all will still be right, but with more info and specifics of what they're researching, then the info might be more consistent. =) [hi jeremy :P] |
|
|||
Quote:
yes, I agree there is inconsistent info out there.. why do you suppose marijuana has been so damn controversial? I'd like to ask though, what kind of research are you doing? I can say I have done research myself... but that sure as hell doesn't mean that I can say that my findings were a "fact". was your research correlational or causational? and if so, did you check for potential confounds? were your variables well defined? if so, what were they? did you do proper statistical analysis to make sure the findings were statistically significant? how do you know how reliable or valid your findings were? do you really think your findings were generalizable to the public? researchers have more ways of ruling out the possibility of "fluke experiments" than you might think. it isn't that simple to be able to call something a "fact". --Joanne :P |
|
|||
^^ excellent post. anyone with even the slightest background in stats can tell you that now-a-days, published studies in reputable periodicals/medical journals are NOT bullshit.
...joanne- youre great! PS. keep this in mind: slitting your wrists with sterile razor blades is probably healthier than inhaling smoke into your lungs. Last edited by watscum; Jul 01, 03 at 03:30 AM. |
|
|||
^^ the logic has evaded you. smoke inhalation- regardless of the type- offers long-term damage to the entire respiratory tract, on the other hand, slitting your wrists (done cleanly) offers only minimal blood loss.
nonetheless, it was satirical..... |
|
|||
who fukin' cares
chill out and go roll sum hyyyydro! oh unless u'd rather do a line of speed ,yea, thats WAY better for u all ne way,fuk its not like u all dont poison ur bodies on a regular basis with ALL THAT CHEMICAL shitt ne ways, why u worried about a lill harmless dro? fukkk,get ur druggs streight peeps! "ummm ok like i just did 2 phatt lines of k and im worried ,will this weed make me sKetChY or sto0pid in the long run"? the answer is no kidds it will chill u out and make u sain again. there is no health affekts. look at me im ur example of a bUrnt crOnik .....do u see ne ything wrong with me? yo if evewryone just smoked weeds at raves maybee this (our) generation would have a chance to live on. |
|
|||
I watched one of the most talented guys I know (sports and otherwise) go completely down hill
used to be an honor roll student and play canada rugby now he dropped out of school and stopped playing sports now he does construction and smokes weed |
|
|||
WELL IM SHURE If he wunt having a go0d time he'd qwit right?
well actually its not THAT easy but ya naamean. and ya know whut....while hes sitting there doing what to u looks like nothing hes problee on rainbows floating with unicorns and leprachauns sliding down watterfalls and froliking with faries and toads. gawd i love marry jane ......shes my main thang! and theres no way i couldove written something like this if i wunt hella blunted |
|
|||
weed didnt kill him , he killed himself he just couldnt handle the weed, lots of people smoke weed on a regular basis and are success full in life and happy in shit If your life goes down hill from smoking weed it is beucase your weak minded.
|