|
The Chronical Chill out, spark a jay, and enter the chronical. |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
special K
i have a few questions about special k. to start off with i heard they are horse tranqs...is that true? what are the effects? i know ppl who drink on them and they get really messed..is that the point? if they are tranqs wouldn't they just sedate you then completly constipate you? any kind of info to k please share.
|
|
|||
oh god, this is why we need a moderator for jokes like this... i doubt this is even a serious post, but just in case
no drinking with it is bad, and can put u in a coma. it has been used as an animal tranquilizer, hence crackheads breaking into veterinary offices. if you or any other trolls wanna know more: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/ketamine/ketamine.shtml |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
" i know ppl who drink on them and they get really messed..is that the point?" so i assumed this was a lame attempt at being funny |
|
|||
this whole omg-he-asked-on-a-message-board attitude is ridiculous. sure he could have looked elsewhere but many of the sites listed in knigel's sig carry out-dated and incomplete info at best and many of the others contain highly questionable info.. google's not going to be any better. sometimes the best info does come at the interpersonal level, especially in cases where geographic location affects things like drug potency and consumption practices.
|
|
|||
ok i didn't mean to come off like an asshole.. i just didn't think u were serious.. but seriously there is alot of info on www.erowid.org and other sites... basically don't drink alcohol before or after you do K to be careful.. and be careful how much u do... very small lines. this shit isn't coke :) so take tiny bumps.. and somewhere where u can sit down if u have too without people bugging you... good luckl
|
|
|||
Quote:
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/%7Errause/k.html keep in mind that i'm a heavily biased crackhead. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
"k is not a dangerous drug, in fact it is very safe. it is still administered to old people, young kids and other people with weak immune systems in place of more traditional aenesthetics because it is so safe. the dangers you hear of so often from the many alarmists out there relate only to its extreme psychological powers.. everyone knows someone who's had a bad experience on k. no doubt it was probably the result of a drug combination, likely with marijuana involved. if you do as i say you will certainly be all right." There is no such thing as a safe drug. Ketamine can be Psychologically Addictive and also has major effects on the motor system so people *can* injure themselves. One may also be concerned of any street market substance, possibility of allergic reaction, brand differences, or contra-indications. I think your article gives the wrong idea about "safe" since it's too bias and doesn't give possibilities and what has been confirmed and not. Remember also that Doctors screw up all of the time and make alot of wrong decisions. Water isn't even a "safe" drug. Some interesting articles: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/keta...ne_info5.shtml If you read this one: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dxm/dxm_health1.shtml Make sure you read this one as well: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/dxm/dxm_health2.shtml Last edited by Knigel; Apr 05, 04 at 06:54 AM. |
|
|||
they are describing one aspect of safety, and in that particular aspect it is fair to say that K is safe - the acute toxicity threshold, which is very low. meaning, pharmacologically, taking an overdose of Ketamine is not likely to kill or intrinsically damage you. in hospital settings K is used at doses several times higher than 'recreational' doses to induce anaesthesia. doses 10x higher than THESE doses have been accidentally administered with complete recovery.
however, there are other factors in determining the safety of a compound, and although Ketamine may have a wide therapeutic ratio, it's unwise to assume anything is completely 'safe'. Ketamine may be physically safer than other 'recreational' substances and may be completely benign - or it may be totally neurotoxic, or somewhere in between. it is not known for sure, yet, so calling anything 'safe' is misleading. one must first define the type of safety potential they are describing - is it acute toxicity, neurotoxicity, physical, psychological, etc? I'm in no way suggesting that Ketamine is dangerous, either - but nothing is as simple as 'safe' and 'dangerous'. as with anything: fool, poison; master, medicine. |
|
|