Capitals vs. Canucks

[Chewy]

a very entertaining game

[Grapes]

Originally Posted by KenJi

Kessler 12 games or so and a whole two assists to show, and now you can add being on the ice for both goals. Can we say a minus player....

For his 1.9 million he should have at least a goal or two.

Nice of Bobby Clark to fuck us over before deciding he doesn't want to be a GM anymore.

In the end though, we have to question our decision to keep him.

I will say, he's had some spectacular moves this year. Just zero finish.

[KenJi]

^ We can thank Nonis too. He didn't have to match. Kessler is a prospect and so far thats all he's proven to be.

but a prospect is not worth 1.9 million dollars.

[Antenna_Boy]

Originally Posted by Dean

^if kestler would have scored there it would've been worth the 1.9 million

pffffffffff~ are you kidding me? one lousy goal??? I don't think so Dean..Pyatt is worth more than Kesler...Kesler is worth 175,000 right now.

[Antenna_Boy]

Originally Posted by Grapes

Nice of Bobby Clark to fuck us over before deciding he doesn't want to be a GM anymore.

In the end though, we have to question our decision to keep him.

I will say, he's had some spectacular moves this year. Just zero finish.

I think using the word "spectacular" is an overstatement. Using the word "OKAY" would be more appropriate for this "I-am-too-good-and-show-nothing-for-it Kesler." :mexitoke: Kesler would have spectacular moves he if could finish---> See definition of "Markus Naslund" in the Vancouver Canucks dictionary of roster players.

[Grapes]

We can thank Nonis too. He didn't have to match.

Refer to the part in my post where I said we have to question our decision to keeph im.

Kesler would have spectacular moves he if could finish

I disagree. Moves can be spectacular without a goal at the end. Especially when you undress a defenseman with some freaky spin out and go in for a clean cut chance on net. Like he's done on 2 or 3 occasions this year.

Does this mean I think all is forgiven and he's earned his salary? Of course not. But you don't want to get into a semantics game with me, Antanna Guy

[KenJi]

^ regardless he is not anywhere near his worth, and should be making no more than 500,000 rite now the way he is playing.

its a good thing the other canucks are scoring or else we would be in the bottom of the division.

[Antenna_Boy]

Originally Posted by Grapes

Refer to the part in my post where I said we have to question our decision to keeph im.



I disagree. Moves can be spectacular without a goal at the end. Especially when you undress a defenseman with some freaky spin out and go in for a clean cut chance on net. Like he's done on 2 or 3 occasions this year.

Does this mean I think all is forgiven and he's earned his salary? Of course not. But you don't want to get into a semantics game with me, Antanna Guy

undressing a player with a spectacular move does not mean that he is a good player.