|
Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
Well, it looks like it took under an hour for the first crash of Vista. I think it took weeks before Windows XP crashed on me for the first time.
For whatever reason, WinAMP doesn't work in Vista, at least not the newest version. I got an older version 5 around somewhere, so we'll see if that works. |
|
|||
http://torrents.thepiratebay.org/has...53.TPB.torrent
Took me like a week and a half to get it though. I could just record you a copy instead. Has both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions as well. |
|
|||
I'd rather throw my money out of the window than to buy windows vista.
Even the bandwith to download a pirated copy would be wasted, no thx. Vista? Eye candy? Uhh...so what does it offer? Seriously, i'm wondering! Can it compete with xgl/beryl? (which is what I'm using here) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpOz8duTh-4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0ZtcxHUSDQ I highly doubt so, but heh, fill me in! :) Last edited by anewlife; Dec 01, 06 at 08:26 PM. |
|
|||
vista just got released and its already out of date, osx 10.5 will probably raise the bar again and be stable.
I'm dual booting osx and xp and also running ubuntu through virtualization in osx for doing embedded software. I keep my ubuntu image on my ipod, seems to work quite well. |
|
|||
Vista isn't bad but the problem in having it installed RIGHT NOW is that most hardware manufacturers haven't developed Vista compatible drivers for it yet. The OFFICIAL release date is Jan. 30th and that's the date most hardware manufacturers are shooting at getting their Vista compatible drivers done by.
Once it has all been OFFICIALLY released (ahem... not BT'ed...) - then it will be much more stable and will have full driver operation. I tested it myself for a bit - it is actually quite much improved over XP. I had to go back to XP though because I needed to have my DJing hardware working... So like I said, don't bother getting it until the official release cause you will be out of luck for drivers at this time. |
|
|||
What is *not* bad about this?
*click* and *click* Quote:
Last edited by anewlife; Dec 02, 06 at 03:59 AM. |
|
|||
All my drivers and most of my programs all work fine within Vista (except for Winamp for some reason, but I guess Media Player works), but it looks like SAMBA support is fucked in Vista. I have an external network hard drive that you connect with through SAMBA, and Vista sees it, but the second you try open/copy/etc., Explorer crashes.
I have an XP Home box right beside me, and that connects fine. Both the laptop and desktop see each other but, again, they won't network at all. As soon as I find a XP Home OEM CD, it's back to XP. |
|
|||
Quote:
All we need now is a legal version of osx (with the GUI) to be bootable on a pc. |
|
|||
Quote:
And it can run both OSX and Windows Vista. |
|
|||
That price would be for their dual 3.0Ghz model. Dells prices are even more than Apple's prices for comparable workstations. Remember their desktops are workstations that use dual xeon processors.
|
|
|||
I'm not saying it's the best, cause I think it's nothing compared to the latest Mac OS and some of the new Mac computers. Man, I would LOVE to own a G5... that's the SHIT when it comes to making electronic music. Although AMD64's are pretty sexy right now. But when the Intel Core Duo's come out and Apple starts using them for CPU - I won't have a choice but to start saving up for one of those Macs...
|
|
|||
Uhhhh Apple made the full switch to Intel quite some time ago now. The mac pros use two core 2 xenon processors. I just bought a macbook pro with a core 2 duo.
Quote:
|
|
|||
If you own one of the new Intel Macs then you can install virtually an OS on it. I have a XP and OS X on mine, my friend has Linux on his as well.
You just need bootcamp, free off the apple webpage. |
|
|||
you could but I think the the vista graphics card requirements might be too high for the macbooks. if I remember correctly the macbooks have an integrated graphics card.
|
|
|||
Vista will run on DX9c cards. You just wont be able to run all the fancy stuff that comes with dx10.
Levathian, I'm well aware that they're dual proc's... which is why I'm saying, I could get the same specs on a pc for 1/4 the price. I get warehouse prices. I've seen a couple hacks to have osx on a pc though.(without emulating it) I couldn't settle for a macbook pro, technology changes too quickly and the worth/performance of it will depreciate significantly within a year. You can throw your video editing days away with a macbook pro, because you'll get nothing done on one of those! G5 > Macbook Pro. And as for rustybob, Give the OS some time, you might be still using an RC2 compilation. Remember when XP first came out? what a shitstorm that was... I believe they did alot better with this version (vista), improved alot but won't be refined until later builds. Last edited by clevich; Dec 04, 06 at 04:31 PM. |
|
|||
^ your wrong.
You obviously don't know much about macs at all. Check out these benchmarks on the old mac book pro vs the G5. Hell the new macbooks even outperform the G5 in some video editing tasks. The Macbook pro was made for Final Cut, thats why they come with firewire 800 interfaces. As for depreciating, your wrong again. Go check out the prices of of the Core duo macbook pros vs the new core 2 duo machines. Apple hardware holds its value for probably 2 times if not 3 times as long as a regular PC. http://www.digitalproducer.com/artic...e.jsp?id=43717 |