|
Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
View Poll Results: For real.... or Bullshit | |||
Holy Cow! This guy is for real! | 0 | 0% | |
This guy is made of bullshit. What farm did he come from? | 7 | 100.00% | |
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
The Real Story about the WTC attacks? Bull or Beleivable?
Given the fact that it *IS* the US Government, this guy's story is pretty far fetched but almost beleiveable.
Either it's 110% bull or so for real its hard to beleive, but the guy manages to pull out very convincing and diverse facts very well worded. I'm reading it and trying to figure it out. It seems totally insane, but........ It is the US government. I stumbled across this looking for an animated gif. ? Check it yourself. http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html |
|
|||
i don't believe the story. there will always be conspiracy theory people out there, just like the people who think elvis is still alive. i mean it's possible, but i don't see why el-quaeda is admitting to it now if the US indeed did do this. also, they have played the blackbox for the families of the victims on the PA crash. seems like a pretty far fetched theory.
tupac lives though OK tupac4LIFE OK |
|
|||
I'm no conspiracy theory beleiver myself.
I'm very skeptical myself. But I do have to say that the amount of attention to detail is extremely accurate. Like, look up the section where they challenge you to find the boeing that hit the pentagon. |
|
|||
that "try and find the boeing that hit the pentagon" picture is shit.
yeah they say that the building is still burning and that there should be pieces of debris everywhere. but you don't know the time that the picture was taken now do you? i don't remember how the plane was flown into the pentagon but that would play a key factor in the way that the plane would be destroyed.i think it was flown into the side of the building. which is made of concrete from the looks of it. Planes are NOT made of materials that would be able to withstand the impact of a nose on collision.. its mostly aluminum skin, aluminum frame, glue, and some rivets. so most likely the plane would have been extremely damaged if not destroyed from the impact and explosions. and just because its an extremely detailed story. doesn't make it real. :Peenutt: |
|
|||
ahh .
i just read his idea on how the towers fell and what should've hapenned. he's wrong. he keeps talking about how the steel girders "melted", which they didn't, and how the tower shouldn't have fell straight down, but should've fallen over a wide area. he's wrong. the steel beams in the middle of the tower, which took most of the load of the floors, was under intense heat from the burning jet fuel. this is very bad. when you heat metal it changes its properties ALOT!. it can go from extremely tough (which they probably were) to weak and malleable (bendable). and you don't need the type of heat from an acetylene torch like he says to do this... i used a bunsen burner and some time and it will work. okay. now to prove him wrong. the steel which provided support to the floors (if i can remember correctly) was weak and over time got so weak that it couldn't support the weight of the floor anymore.. so the one floor collaspsed on the other... the significance of the floors falling is that the floors gave the outside walls which basically keep the building standing support to prevent buckling... but when one floor collapsed it hit the floor below which couldn't take the load of the floor which just fell and the heat of fire so it collasped and it was like a domino effect... then basically the there was no supports to prevent buckling and buckling occurd and it collasped in on itself and fell. buckling is when you apply a load on each end of say a metal ruler and it "bows" out. his theory is garbage. :Peenutt: |
|
|||
And what reason would America have to do this? The airline industry was all but destroyed, billions in damage, weapons used in Afghanistan had already been stockpiled, the confidence in a secure America shattered and a shitload in extra security is being spent. I was expecting his reason to be an oil pipeline in Afghanistan or something to that effect... but an ongoing plan since kennedy to destroy the Americas and replace it with a dictatorship?????!!!! then take over the world??????
As for Kennedy.. who was the only Catholic President in US History? Take a guess. All the others were protestants. Not saying "for sure" that has anything to do with it, but he was scared of his life for that fact. And being from a powerful Protestant Irish background, I can tell you this is a much more viable explanation than some group who wants to take over the world. |
|
|||
Re: The Real Story about the WTC attacks? Bull or Beleivable?
Quote:
I hope when you find this animated gif..... its not going to be on the website advertising a new club night |
|
|||
...it's juss another one of those things..
like one time on channel 28.. they had like a 1hr show about how.. the US didn't actually land on the moon... back when first man...landed on the moon thing.. they had all this radiation stuff and blahblahblah... but still..they juss covered THEIR aspect of the story there are alot of flaws to THEIR aspect as well... sooo either way..it's not a win//lost thing.. we'll never know.. |