|
Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=mason
Definition number 2. Thanks for coming out. PS It's George Herbert Walker Bush actually, or GHWB. You seem to bring up 23 alot, I've found no significance of this numero. According to Bill Cooper ...[rip]... #'s 3, 7, 9, 11, 13 and any multiple of these numbers has special meaning to Illuminati. Everything I've seen you post about teh NUMbRZ H45 b33N iN4(UR473!!!1 570P Mi5iNf0RMiNG 7h3 PUbLi(!!!1 |
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Well, let' rule out 9 because it's a multiple of 3. Note that that's the first 5 prime numbers after the first one save the number 5 itself. Ever play bridge? Probably not. If you did though, you'd know that the most common divide of 5 is into 2 and 3, hence the 23. Quote:
|
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Ebbomega: C'mon you love Wilson so much and you're saying probably instead of maybe?
http://www.maybelogic.com I'd kick your ass in bridge ;). Show me where 23 is referenced in historical monuments, secret societies, religious text etc and then I'll care. Maybe I didn't look hard enough but all I saw after a google search was Dobbs inspired sites that were self referenced. I want semi-palatable leads atleast. ... Senior: You're right, they are a distraction, for the most part. But let's just say you were a Multi Billionaire with a global network of Billionaires working through world government forums and secret societies. Wouldn't it make sense to bury the truth in a mountain of lies? That way people hunting for truth would be met with lets say, 80% disinformation. Upon seeing all this useless jargon, they'd become demoralized and write the whole thing off as a "useless distraction" as you did? I know you like staying in the political, so I will show you a fairly concise arguement on political conspiracy. *Take Bilderberg's stragle hold on NATO for example (it's odd how they have so many influencial members yet you never hear about them on the media no?)* To understand who controls the leadership of NATO, the world's biggest military operation, you only have to look at the connection of the NATO Secretary-Generals to the Bilderberg Group. · The earlier sec-gens do not appear to have been Bilderberg attendees, but if you know different, please let me know. These were Lord Ismay (1952-1957), Paul Henri Spaak (1957-1961), Dirk U. Stikker (1961-1964), and Manlio Brosio (1964-1971). But from then on, the leader of NATO has become a Bilderberg appointment. They are: · Joseph Luns (1971-1984) Bilderberg Group · Lord Carrington (1984-1988) Bilderberg Group, the chairman since 1991). · Manfred Wörner (1988-1994) Bilderberg Group · Willy Claes (1994-1995) Bilderberg Group · Javier Solana (1995-1999) Bilderberg Group · Lord Robertson (1999- ) Bilderberg Group How much easier it therefore becomes to instigate Bilderberg policy in the Gulf, Bosnia, Kosovo, etc., etc. Especially when every major "peace" negotiator in Bosnia was a member of Bilderberg and/or it's related network, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations, and Trilateral Commission. And now an unbiased report on the Bilderberg conspiracy. This documentary is about 40mins, watch it or don't reserve judgement Nolan: http://tv.phaseiii.org/?channel=3&vi...iew_fair_use=1 Or plop this in your media player: http://video.phaseiii.org/documentar...ildeberger.wmv Make any judgement you want afterwords, but if you don't watch it, you can't say it's a waste of time since you know nothing about it. |
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
http://parecon.org/ and http://www.mawovancouver.org/ Quote:
|