|
||||
Quote:
As for parties the same night, yes they happened, and yes it was a big deal, but there was no one from the production companies (and their associates [ie: you, but not you specifically right now. :)]) who would slag the other company. It just wasn't done. People had respect for others and didn't run their mouths off. Quote:
The people =/= the production company (in this case Solid). It makes good business sense to bring in talent that people want to see. Do you think any production company would say "Hey, lets bring in DJ YYYY because the people want to see him/her, but if spending $XXXXX means we WILL lose money, that's okay. The kids will be happy they saw them!"? NOT A FREAKING CHANCE. NOT going to happen. Regardless of anything else, it IS a business. To entice the people to your party, you have to bring out who they want to see. As for people having a good time, that's also part of the business. If people think that a show sucked, that's going to affect how they view the company, and it's going to affect whether of not they go to another party thrown by that company. One of the golden rules of business is: KEEP YOUR CUSTOMERS HAPPY. Period. I also agree that Apex is a customer appreciation party. For a $20 max ticket (not VIP), this year people got to see The Thrillseekers and DJ Abstract (who you would pay about that much to see on their own), not to mention all the rest of the DJs there. At any given moment there is music playing that any given person is going to like (be it hip hop, trance, breaks, dnb, house, etc). That seems like a pretty good deal, don't you think? THAT is why it's unfortunate that Solid sees Swing Kids as competition to be avoided. They could have been involved in something that's an integral part of Vancouver's scene and they chose not to. I think it's sad more than anything. |
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
^i think atlantis has just as much knowledge as you (iluvtechno)..........its just you both have different view points on the situation.
this shit really needs to either be dealt with or forgotten about who the fuck cares if there are 2 top companies now rather than one? who cares if there are 2 parties on the same night? it just provides the people with more than one option as both parties should have relatively different lineups. both companies deserve respect for different reasons, and really who cares who's throwing the party as long as its good? theoretically i could throw a halloween party that would blow these two out of the water, it may not sell out becuz no one would know of my production name, or i wouldnt have giant international djs........ basically what im gettin at is that people really need to stop caring about so much shit and just go to have fun, why get your self involved in shit that you dont need to? why worry about politics and feuds that dont even concern you? bah......enough rambling Last edited by omega_image; Aug 15, 04 at 01:24 AM. |
|
||||
Quote:
I've been raving long enough to know how things DID work, and how they work now. There is a major problem with how things work now. Period. I KNOW how a business is run. I've worked in retail for long enough to get an idea. You don't always need to have hands on experience to get the gist of something. Plus, MANY of my friends have thrown both sucessful and unsuccessful parties, and I've seen the repercussions of both. Some have had to take out loans to cover their debts. Don't tell me what I know and don't know. Your ignorance just further validates my post. |
|
|||
OK one last comment and then I hang up the gloves on this issue. As an audience member what would you prefer to see:
1) 2 x ok looking shows with ok headliners both parties only half full. Only half the money spent on production for each show. OR 2) 1 x Big Party in a big venue with great headliners massive production and still the same price. What everyone seems to be not seeing here is that competition is good.I agree but let your partys stand alone. Two parties do not have to be on the same night to be viewed and criticed by your audience. By throwing two parties on the same night you are going to be taking the current audience that barely fills the colisiuem and splitting in half cutting the energy and vibe in half for both parties. Now I 'don't know about you people but this issue for me has absolutly nothing to do with Spooky and Dooms Night at all!!!!!! These two parties are going to happen and no matter who creates the most hype to be completly honest I feel both parties are going to be lacking! Why you may ask? Well it's simple the "competition" is now affecting your audiences. Competition is fine as long as it doesn't affect the end user. Now you can relate that to the Computer Industry or any industry for that matter and this rings true. By continuing this type of promoting behaviour you are effectivly splitting the scene into peices and slowly destroying it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 YEs that's right destroying it. I have been around this scene for over 12 years and more than 6 countries so please do not tell me I don't know what I'm talking about. I have seen 100's of companies come and go but they always left the scene better than they came into it. The bottom line is this has absolutly nothing to do with the scen or the "competition" its purely and simply EGOS. EGOS are the number one destroyer of buisnesses. DOn't believe me I can introduce you to tons of people who have had succesful market places crumble because people can't check their EGO's at the door. Once again I make the OFFER. I have a conference room and a calender. I will be more than willing to mediate and meeting to ensure the success of all companies and the scene. If you do not take this offer it just shows me that the use of good, practical, buissness sense is lost on all. I have already been contacted by a few directors of promtional companies willing to sit down and work this stuff out and a few that I know would be willing if I asked. If this sounds like something SOLID would like to go ahead with let me know. More importantly forget SOLID Mike and Ben you are the guys that are really heading the operations up over there please show everyone that you guys are the not only the buissness men but the proffesionals that I know you are. What I am saying is true and not one of the production copanies in this town can deny it and if any of the promotional companies can look me in the face and tell me honestly what I am saying is not the truth then I will admit I am mistaken but I think much more highly of, Mike, Ben , Azim , Dave, Rick, Salim, Marty, Ivan then they know. If everyone can put the past in the past and sit down and work on the future the scene will become stronger than it has ever been and for the audience you can look forward to more big name Dj's and large show quality at every event. Yes the scene has changed but isn't it time we changed it again for the better. PROMOTERS THE BALL IS IN YOU COURT. I HAVE MADE THE OFFER TO HELP (At no cost) TO GET EVERYONE ON TRACK AND BUILDING A STRONG SCENE FOR EVERYONE FOR YEARS TO COME. p.s. Miss Behaviour I value your opinion. |
|
||||
[quote=G-Style]OK one last comment and then I hang up the gloves on this issue. As an audience member what would you prefer to see:
1) 2 x ok looking shows with ok headliners both parties only half full. Only half the money spent on production for each show. OR 2) 1 x Big Party in a big venue with great headliners massive production and still the same price. QUOTE] The problem with #2 is that the amount of money generated for the party will vary. And with that in mind there will be problems associated with whom will get what portion of the profit(if any). If you get two competitors working together, well, don't count on it always being successful..there is still the politics involved! |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
[quote=Antenna_Boy]
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
your stupid |
|
|||
Quote:
silly goose!! |
|
|||
Quote:
Congrats you just won runner up for my most ignorent person on this boards award!! Missbehaviour and G-style . . . your posts have left me speachless!! You 2 pretty much summed up everything. *applause to the both of you * |
|
|||
Quote:
I just remember shit loads of people coming from there to spooky when the power went out. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
my response to MissBehavior's reply:
absolutely. yes... times have changed, but i totally understand if ppl refuse to accept their current circumstances and demand better, because that is how progress is made. anyways... i am merely a casual observer of this whole drama unfolding. i could care less if the "scene" is becoming too commercialized, mainstream, or competitive for other ppl's liking. i am just making observations that i find to be ironic and doesn't make sense to me (e.g. how ppl complain about solid for their inactions which they decided on their own, rather than conforming to what everyone says they should be doing because "thats the way it should be"...) AntennaBoy said it best: companies can do whatever they want... because it's a free country! there is no governing authority out there that dictates how the rave scene should function. so why not just respect ppl's decisions to do what they want (i.e. throw a halloween party) or to not do what they want (e.g. not do an apex stage and take a breather after putting on a big show like IMF). this is just a hypothetical situation, but i wonder how u fnkers will respond when Twisted Productions (or any other major player) decide to "hang it up and retire" from all this drama. (and lets just pretend that if these major players retire, it pretty much means the end of massives for a long while.) surely u will respect their decision to move on to other things right? or are u gonna absolutely demand "NO! you cannot quit because u exist to serve us, the all-important ravers!" my point is: it doesnt seem fair to go lynching ppl just because they make their own independent decisions for their own independent reasons. |