Quote:
Originally Posted by miss.myra
At first, I figured I was fine with the at large system because I feel that city hall right now is fairly accessable should I have an issue that I feel needs to be raised.
I thought, it seems really hard to think of the city ever compromising when councillors are elected to look after the best interests of their area and not the city as a whole, not to mention the ward system is costly.
But after some research, it seems that with the way the current system is, that a lot of ethinic/social groups are not fairly represented in the city.
So with a week to go, I am completely undecided.
|
The ward system would only be more expensive in the sense that we would have 14 instead of 10 city councilors. The city is recomending that even under the at large system we add them anyway. So no the ward system is not more expensive. The actual increase for the added councillors will be $0.30 per year per resident.
As far as councilors not compromissing if they are charged with looking after the best interests of an area not the whole city it's the same thing as having an MLA for a part of the province. Would you really suggest having an at large system is better for the whole city overall? Besides having all the different views expressed would in my opinion lead to more balanced decisions being made.