CNN Reported No Plane Hit Pentagon on 9/11!! +An indepth analysis of official version

[Goodfellow]

Originally Posted by Hot Karl

if this is so important and such a big deal, then yes you'd honestly give a fuck. and since you're so sure of yourself and the conspiracy, you won't get owned, so why don't you go over there?
i'm assuming you're not accepting my challenge. hopefully markpaul or wum does. to tell you the truth i don't really care about you, i don't recall every posting/speaking to you regarding this subject, whereas markpaul and myself have had previous arguments.

no you didn't argue with me, i just have the same opinion as they do. you still didn't answer my questions ..

[wum]

Karl, this isn't about ego (but pm me later about the bj ).

Understanding 9/11, and realizing that this is but a small cog in a grand design is really the point.

Until then, no matter the mounting evidence of governmental duplicity, one still lacks motive. And that’s where the NWO comes in.

We should at least get hip to what's going on when the shit could hit the fan in just a few years.

Besides that, this is more interesting than the other shit that gets posted in the lounge

[miss.myra]

Originally Posted by wum

We should at least get hip to what's going on when the shit could hit the fan in just a few years.

Interesting you say could and not will.

[wum]

Originally Posted by miss.myra

Interesting you say could and not will.

In this case, the could is qualifying the number of years. It may be this year, or 3 years from now, but it will go down.

Thanks for the tip, Frau Myra. :)

[miss.myra]

Are you just going to sit and wait and be anxious about it? Or actually live your life until this potentially could happen?

[wum]

Originally Posted by miss.myra

Are you just going to sit and wait and be anxious about it? Or actually live your life until this potentially could happen?

I dunno really :(

[miss.myra]

I'd highly reccomend the latter :)

(insert rainbow group hug emoticon here.)

[wum]

here we go

[miss.myra]

aww, that was really nice wumbles! really nice!

[esoter1c]

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/

[diesskei]

I read a pretty ironic/funny article recently in one of my older GQ magazines. All of this information comes from this article, and most of it is researched by a man named Norm Ornstein.

He states that if America were to suffer a catastrophic attack and the White House was hit... if half of the people in that house died, there would be no house. According to the Constitution, a majority of each house of Congress must be present before business can be conducted. Without that majority, Congress would be paralyzed. It couldn't approve money for military operations; it couldn't provide disaster relief; it couldn't declare war. What's worse is that there is absolutely no plan in place if this were to ever happen. The people (I'm not sure who they talked to) say that "ours is a system that will cope with it" which means they're basically saying we should have a period of benign martial law.

It gets better yet too. None of the government's three branches is prepared for what counterterrorism spooks gruesomely call a political "decapitation"- an attack that knocks out most or all of the political leadership. For instance, replacing a dead president could be a nightmare for more than the obvious reasons. The rules governing the presidential line of succession are antiquated and illogical. The Constitution states that the vice president will replace the president if he dies or leaves office. Beyond that it's unclear. A more detailed line of succession was devised in 1947, but it's a fairly bizarre plan: The Speaker of the House is in line after the vice president, and then comes the Senate president pro tem, which happens to be a powerless title traditionally held by the most senior member of the Senate's majority party. This means that on September 11, 83-year-old Robert Byrd of West Virginia was third in line to be president of the United States. (Had Jim Jeffords not left the Republican Party and become an independant a few months earlier, the extremely sleepy 98-year-old Strom Thurmond would have been their man.)

Apparently since that accident and the prospect of having these attacks occur to the US, their government has only taken a couple of tiny baby steps to buy some time, rather than deal with it. They've completely avoided or actively tried to block things that would deal with the larger set of problems. According to Ornstein, the Senate has at least begun to consider the problem, albeit slowly, while the House has remained obstinate. Which is a bit ironic given that members of the Senate can be immediately replaced by governors from their home states. In the House, however, the Constitution requires special elections to fill vacant seats, and even under ideal circumstances special elections take months. As the House waited to replace its members, the legislative branch would be paralyzed.

What does all of this information have to do with anything discussed within this post? What I'm trying to show you is that these governments are shady. They don't even have a plan for this type of event? Why do they not fear this type of attack? What does that tell you? Governments are arrogant yes, but not that arrogant to think an attack will never happen. Another war is imminent, just give it time. So again I ask, why have they not dealt with the prospect of their destruction?

I doubt I will have persuaded any of you with this information, but maybe you will start questioning things a little more. Either way, whatever your opinion is, it's all good. We are at least each entitled to that.

[stabmyhead]

NinjaBoy Under stabby's account

Originally Posted by diesskei

What does all of this information have to do with anything discussed within this post? What I'm trying to show you is that these governments are shady. They don't even have a plan for this type of event? Why do they not fear this type of attack? What does that tell you? Governments are arrogant yes, but not that arrogant to think an attack will never happen. Another war is imminent, just give it time. So again I ask, why have they not dealt with the prospect of their destruction?

It would be incredibly hard to pass a bill that would lead to the restructuring of the US government. Such an endevor would take years, and for the most part it would take too much effort.

[wum]

^ ever heard of the Patriot Act? :)

[wum]

Here's a nice primer for the unbelievers...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/020804vonbuelow.html


AJ: Also, sir, we have NORAD standing down for an hour and twenty five minutes but when we had the golfer Payne Stewart went off course for fifteen minutes, he was surrounded in eighteen minutes by five F-16s so why did NORAD stand down?

[djmarkpaul]

Karl d/l 911 in plane site and post a review of the film, then I will take up your challange.

Get bit torrent and click this link for the movie:

http://torrentreactor.net/view.php?id=5044078

or this one (smaller file size):

http://torrentreactor.net/view.php?id=5036353

[wum]

.

[crookedking]

if i was a rothchild i'd do the same shit that they're doing nowadays.

YOU'D ALL BE MY SLAVES.

[Hot Karl]

my work comp has no sound, and my home comp is currently infected with a virus, so it'll be a little while before i can view that video.

but way to confirm my belief that your proof won't stand up. i mean if you got the answers then show them off. but wait, once again the burden of proof is on me, even though i'm not the one making dubious claims.

this feels like an evolution/creationism argument.

i'll try to watch that video a.s.a.p. but why don't you just go prove yourself.

won't really be checking this thread too often, because it'll be the same tired bullshit.

[esoter1c]

This Thread Is Officially A Dead Beaten Horse !

Stop Beating The Dead Horse !

[Goodfellow]

Originally Posted by Hot Karl

my work comp has no sound, and my home comp is currently infected with a virus, so it'll be a little while before i can view that video.

but way to confirm my belief that your proof won't stand up. i mean if you got the answers then show them off. but wait, once again the burden of proof is on me, even though i'm not the one making dubious claims.

this feels like an evolution/creationism argument.

i'll try to watch that video a.s.a.p. but why don't you just go prove yourself.

won't really be checking this thread too often, because it'll be the same tired bullshit.

the thing is, you are gunna keep believing what you believe and we are gunna keep believing what we believe. i went to that site you were talking about, and by browsing multiple threads, all i saw was a bunch of people who seemed comfortable in spending 10 years of their life trying to disprove the existance of a god with mathematic formula or theory .. so i'm not even gunna bother arguing with them about how the US gov. is setup .. it'll be like talkin to a brick wall

[wum]

You gotta watch the video with an open mind. Once you're done with that one, move onto Alex Jones.