|
Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
||||
Legal distinctions like "guardian" and "best interest" are totally drowning out the fact that she has responded vigorously in the eleventh hour of this whole debacle. She wants to live.
Quote:
Yes, that's only opinion but the basis for keeping her alive is not to simply investigate the husband. She responds to her mother when asked if she wants to live. Isn't that affirmation enough that she deserves to live? As well, the so-called "vegetative" state proclaimed by doctors lays out as follows: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Independent doctors have said she is not in a vegetative state. She has never explicitly said she wants the plug pulled, and her husband only came up with the idea years later. Give Terry a chance you bastards.
:213: |
|
|||
u know whats really sad about this...is that theyre trying to end her life by starving her to death...thats jus fucking barbaric. its not like its life support where u can pull the plug because theyre living on machines...shes still alive on her own shes jus mentally not there. in her mind she must be in pure agony knowing that shes hungry and cant tell someone that. its a brutal situaion, and it makes me sad jus thinking about it.
|
|
|||
Just as a side note:
It is illuminating to note that when people call other people biased, they usually fall on opposite sides of the issue at hand. How convenient! Calling someone's opinion "biased" with the intention to discredit their argument is illogical. It may not be glaringly obvious in this case, but saying something like that is actually an example of argumentum ad hominem. In this context, the general form would look like this: "X has made an argument. X is always biased. Therefore, X's argument is false" Applying this to a news source, while not technically an ad hominem fallacy, is the same basic idea. "This news source is always biased, therefore anything it says is false". Be careful! While it may be easy to pigeonhole people or groups of people into ideological groups and assume that everything they say is wrong, it isn't logical, and should be avoided! There are often truths to be found on both sides of an issue. Cheers! |
|
||||
let the poor lady die in peace. do you call what she is living? dont you think the after life would be a better place for her.
this whole news story is sad sick and disgusting. if she cant naturally sustain life on her own....then let her soul pass on. its almost as if her soul is being kept captive by medical teknowlogie. its all wrong. |
|
|||
denying someone food and "pulling the plug" are so diffrent to me.
did anyone else watch the daily show lastnight? they were talking about terri. and making fun of fox. "and leave it up to fox to bring on the best expert" then they show a clip of fox and the "expert" some psychic. oh yes, the daily show is good for a laugh. |
|
|||
Quote:
come on now, i heard she's showed obvious signs of dehydration and malnutrition but skin cracking and gasping? really, you need an internet crap filter. |
|
||||
Quote:
edit: go to her website that I posted above. chalk full of info |
|
|||
Quote:
and is removing her one source of sustinence the right way to go about teaching her? |