|
Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
Halleluljah !!!!!!
Quote:
|
|
|||
I can agree that most of a dog's behaviour is based on the owner. However what kind of owner wants a pitt bull? I think there ugly and are desighned/bread to be a strong fierce fighting dog. Therefore it seems the more agressive type owners get the tougher dogs like pit bulls and rotwhilers (sp?) Hence why I dont trust most pitt bulls and rotwhiles. However besides owners there is also instinct and what the bread has been trained to do. Example a golden retreaver loves to fetch things where a pitt bull can easly become agressive and firce compared to most dogs.
As for the cow... ill leave that up to mother nature. As for the solders shooting the dogs... well if those two dogs are willing to take on a a huge bull... just imagine what they could do to a human. Last edited by Ree Fresh; Oct 02, 05 at 07:38 PM. |
|
|||
Ugly ?
Quote:
I don't know what you're talkin' about ! |
|
||||
ok i have to jump in here...i proudly own 2 purebred pitbulls with my ex...(not proud that there with my ex) but anyways...They are not ugly... they are amazing animals. Dont be racist towards dogs. Thats like saying that person is brown and ugly lets shoot them. Not fair. its the circle of life. animals kill eachother for survival. its not the pitbulls fault. Just because they have a bad name, which is because lots of the owners of them fuck them up when they are puppies...doesnt mean the actuall dog is bad. people who say shit like pitbulls are all sour dogs and should be banned are FUCKED!
i love my dogs more than anything.... They would only ever kill if it was there last resort for food. |
|
||||
ya like dags?!?
Personally I don't find pitt bulls an attractive breed of dog, but by no means do I think that no one should own one. I believe that there should be some sort of standardized screening involved when the purchase/adoption of an "aggressive" breed of dog is being done. All breeds of dogs can become aggressive, but some are genetically pre-disposed to this, similar to the way "working" class breeds have been genetically developed over the years. Owners are the ones that should be held responsible, and unfit owners shouldn't have the dog.
Sounds like common sense, no? I'm actually a huge fan of rottweilers, they're gorgeous animals; big, strong, loyal and extremely well adjusted around children. They're also work horses, always looking to please their owners. Similar to pitt bulls they've gotten a bad rap, although they're not as genetically engineered as the pitt bulls are they're still up there in aggressive traits. Dogs should not be given out to owners just because someone really wants one. The wrong dog with the wrong owner spells nothing but trouble; regardless of the breed. Owners should be screened. Hell they do it with adopting children, why not with pets. |
|
|||
Quote:
Regretabley the possibility of beauracracy/redtape. avenues for corruption and ignorant staff is quite large, and would render the structure as backwards as those set out for the adoption of humans:( |
|
|||
So right !
Quote:
You should definitely have to go through some sort of a screening process and have a special license for certain dogs, not poodles or shitzus but any dog that can reach 80lbs or more. I fuckin' hate seein' some og henny low wannabe slim shady type with Pittys, wish I could confiscate em'. Too long growers have been usin' dogs as security in grow shows, you got money buy some fuckin cameras. All over surrey theres dogs tied up outside 24/7 no one takin em' for runs or even socially interactin' with em', you know the ones tied to a tree and theres a lil' track around it looks like a fuckin' moat. I see this G.Shepheard across the street from my house n he's tied up all day to a cement brick fence stuck on his driveway, not even a fuckin' blanket to lay on, it's not some crack shack either, hese people are middle upper and they treat their dog like shit ! I wish I could tie up the owners like their dog ! |
|
|||
if i was an animal starving and needed food and that was what was around to eat then i'd eat it. the poor dogs were probably just hungry. remember how everyone fled? well a lot of people left their animals. i lot of people died and the animals lost their owners. they gotta eat somehow. would you all be saying that these dogs were bad for trying to take the bull if they were lions or tigers or bears(haha) i think not. its all about survival of the fittest man. pitbulls need to have food too and if they really are from new orleans then they're going to try and eat you or the bull or the horse or the other animals that it might come across. just like we kill animals for food so do they. as long as its food who cares if its a "human" or an animal. the only things that care if people are being eaten are people but we are animals too. so let em eat us what right do we really have over any other animals?
|