|
|||
Nike+
|
|
|||
next ipod should be BT and nike should make BT shoes.
everything should be bluetooth. no wires ftw. be a nerd and hear this news a day earlier! www.gizmodo.com for all your nerdy gadgety bloggy news <3 back to ryan's thunder. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
Nike make me laugh, see the following (long winded I know but very funny).
Nike Personalized "Sweatshop" Shoes Nike now lets you personalize your shoes by submitting a word or phrase which they will stitch onto your shoes, under the swoosh. So Jonah Peretti filled out the form and sent them $50 to stitch "sweatshop" onto his shoes. Here's the responses he received. Note that the San Jose Mercury spoke with Peretti and verified that this really happened. From: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <[email protected]> To: "'Jonah H. Peretti'" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000 Your NIKE iD order was canceled for one or more of the following reasons. 1) Your Personal iD contains another party's trademark or other intellectual property. 2) Your Personal iD contains the name of an athlete or team we do not have the legal right to use. 3) Your Personal iD was left blank. Did you not want any personalization? 4) Your Personal iD contains profanity or inappropriate slang, and besides, your mother would slap us. If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD product with a new personalization please visit us again at www.nike.com Thank you, NIKE iD From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <[email protected]> To: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000 Greetings, My order was canceled but my personal NIKE iD does not violate any of the criteria outlined in your message. The Personal iD on my custom ZOOM XC USA running shoes was the word "sweatshop." Sweatshop is not: 1) another's party's trademark, 2) the name of an athlete, 3) blank, or 4) profanity. I choose the iD because I wanted to remember the toil and labor of the children that made my shoes. Could you please ship them to me immediately. Thanks and Happy New Year, Jonah Peretti From: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <[email protected] To: "'Jonah H. Peretti'" <[email protected] Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000 Dear NIKE iD Customer, Your NIKE iD order was canceled because the iD you have chosen contains, as stated in the previous e-mail correspondence, "inappropriate slang". If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD product with a new personalization please visit us again at www.nike.com Thank you, NIKE iD From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <[email protected] To: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <[email protected] Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000 Dear NIKE iD, Thank you for your quick response to my inquiry about my custom ZOOM XC USA disagree with the claim that my personal iD was inappropriate slang. After consulting Webster's Dictionary, I discovered that "sweatshop" is in fact part of standard English, and not slang. The word means: "a shop or factory in which workers are employed for long hours at low wages and under unhealthy conditions" and its origin dates from 1892. So my personal iD does meet the criteria detailed in your first email. Your web site advertises that the NIKE iD program is "about freedom to choose and freedom to express who you are." I share Nike's love of freedom and personal expression. The site also says that "If you want it done right...build it yourself." I was thrilled to be able to build my own shoes, and my personal iD was offered as a small token of appreciation for the sweatshop workers poised to help me realize my vision. I hope that you will value my freedom of expression and reconsider your decision to reject my order. Thank you, Jonah Peretti From: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <[email protected]> To: "'Jonah H. Peretti'" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000 Dear NIKE iD Customer, Regarding the rules for personalization it also states on the NIKE iD web site that "Nike reserves the right to cancel any Personal iD up to 24 hours after it has been submitted". In addition it further explains: "While we honor most personal iDs, we cannot honor every one. Some may be (or contain) others trademarks, or the names of certain professional sports teams, athletes or celebrities that Nike does not have the right to use. Others may contain material that we consider inappropriate or simply do not want to place on our products. Unfortunately, at times this obliges us to decline personal iDs that may otherwise seem unobjectionable. In any event, we will let you know if we decline your personal iD, and we will offer you the chance to submit another." Thank you, NIKE iD From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <[email protected]> To: "Personalize, NIKE iD" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Your NIKE iD order o16468000 Dear NIKE iD, Thank you for the time and energy you have spent on my request. I have decided to order the shoes with a different iD, but I would like to make one small request. Please send me a color snapshot of the ten-year-old Vietnamese girl who makes my shoes? Thanks, Jonah Peretti The last message received no response. |
|
||||
Quote:
The stopwatch is a great idea. Anyone who's truly serious about running competitvely should get themselves a coach or a trainer who can hold it. Everyone else, the real key is not having a new addition to your ipod nano, it's getting off your ass and out the door. Just got back from a run myself, and my brain(tm) worked great. Too bad my lungs(tm) didn't function as well. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
Quote:
PS I heard you can feel the lump in your shoe that is recording the data. PPS I'm not sharing my stats with anyone! |
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
when it comes down to it necessity has little to do with the gadgets we buy. its all about convenience |
|
|||
|
||||
Quote:
I think we're built/programmed to want to acquire things, for whatever reason. Perhaps it's our hunter/gatherer nature... the possibility of improved convenience or efficiency is a big part of how our modern society fulfils that inbuilt "want", now that hunting/gathering takes a mere hour or two a week at the supermarket. There was an article in the Guardian the other day talking about Heinz's new product.. instant beans on toast. Apparently here in England, beans on toast is a popular snack (which is weird to the point of deserving its own thread) and heinz has now come up with a prepackaged product that is beans already on toast. The graphic for the story showed a can of beans a knife, and a piece of toast, and then the finished product asking "When did (A) + (B) = (C) become too hard?" And of course, it's not too hard, but wouldn't it be that much more *convenient* if it was already done for you? (if you could put aside the fact that Heinz's product probably tastes horrible and is bad for you, which you really shouldn't). This Ipod/running shoe combination is obviously a far better product, but the fact remains that I can see on a map how far I've run (approximately.. does that extra half km matter much?).. I don't even bring a watch, I tend to look at the clock when I leave and again when I come back.. what am I missing out on that someone who has this new technology is gaining? When have our lives got convenient enough that we don't need to make them more efficient, on the whole? Is there a limit? Or since we're built to want to improve improve improve, should we keep feeding that desire, in our absence of real need? Maybe the latter is the case.. maybe it's not healthy to sit on our hands and go "good enough"? Though my opinions on the particular gadget under discussion obviously aren't going to change much, I'm fully open to debate on this broader issue. |