Sluts: Mainstreaming Casual Sex

[wum]

Nature has put an alluring bloom on young women for an obvious reason, and it fades in time with their fertility.

Males are attracted to the bloom. In their bee-brains, pleasure is separate from procreation. They deposit their semen and move on to the next flower without concern for the woman or the consequences.

Sexual liberation sanctions and encourages this callous and primitive behavior and invites the woman to collude in her own degradation.

It allows the male to take the only thing that interests him and ignore the woman's humanity in terms of her natural life cycle as a wife and mother.

Sexual intercourse represents the essence of her commitment to her husband and her offspring. Women who have had many partners find it more diifcult to bond to one man, and consequently he has difficulty bonding with her.

Take away a woman's innocence and she is a man, with a male sex-pattern, treating lovers as sex objects.

Then we have two male pretenders trying to bond.Like many homosexuals, who cannot form biological families, they remain alone, isolated and obsessed with sex.

http://www.savethemales.ca/

I thought this week's contribution was particularily good

[Grapes]

Bwahaha.. I like how you chose to clip the article at that point.

The very next line:

Casual sex is promoted in order to destroy the heterosexual family. The bankers who financed Communism want the state to replace the father as head of the family.

It's funny because I thought everything preceeding that was at least reasonable, and then all of a sudden it's like.. WHOAH HAIRY RIGHT TURN.

Yea I'm pretty sure all those columnists who are in favour of casual sex have a hidden agenda to "destroy the hetero family".. thereby (obviously) supporting the commie bankers, who want to replace the father as the head of the family FOR SOME REASON

[sinnerman]

^^^

Haha ... I think you mean right turn--as in a right-winged, extremely conservative turn. It's funny because they're not making this up; it's what they actually believe.
We the people (except for homos)...

[wum]

you guys weren't supposed to follow up on that shit :(

[Grapes]

I think you mean right turn

Touche. Edited.

you guys weren't supposed to follow up on that shit

Who's got a good "owned" img?

[miss.myra]

Originally Posted by wum

alone, isolated and obsessed with sex.

Wow, I really don't want much more about life! Thank god the internet told me how I can get this kind of lifestyle.

[robyn]

Originally Posted by Grapes

Yea I'm pretty sure all those columnists who are in favour of casual sex have a hidden agenda to "destroy the hetero family".. thereby (obviously) supporting the commie bankers, who want to replace the father as the head of the family FOR SOME REASON

'... and the rand corperation, in conjunction with the saucer people, under the supervision of the reverse vampires...'

[wum]

so the "conspiracy" part notwithstanding, the logic seems rather reasonable, no? =)

[robyn]

He might actually have a point if he didn’t come across as such a paranoid nutbar trying to disguise outright misogyny and homophobia as concern for everyone’s well being.

Ps – I think he really brings it all together in the conclusion!

CONCLUSION

We live in a society under the malignant grip of a satanic totalitarian philosophy, call it neo-Communism. Central bankers want to extend their monopoly on credit to control our bodies, minds and souls as well.

[wum]

Originally Posted by robyn

He might actually have a point if he didn’t come across as such a paranoid nutbar trying to disguise outright misogyny and homophobia as concern for everyone’s well being.

Ps – I think he really brings it all together in the conclusion!

Rob, if the world is really run by mysoginistic powerful white males like your women's studies classes teach, why the sudden change of heart?

Where do these departments of study that produce really nothing of tangible value get their money from? How were downtrodden minorities, women, homosexuals, etc. etc. suddenly able to force this watershed and wrest control from the "Patriarchy"?

The answer is they haven't. Feminism gets direct funding from the Rockefeller foundation. None of these movements are anti-establishment. Gloria Steinem herself admits that she worked for the CIA! They only serve to empower the establishment, which is population control and socialism.

[Grapes]

^ whole lotta nonsense up there, wummy.

We live in a society under the malignant grip of a satanic totalitarian philosophy, call it neo-Communism.

I love this part.. I can imagine him typing the first bit of the sentence, and then going "well, let's call it.... hmmmm.... what term would be vaguely alarmist enough... Neo-Nazisim?.. nah, no-ones going to buy that... let's see... ah! Call it, neo-communism!"

[robyn]

Originally Posted by wum

Rob, if the world is really run by mysoginistic powerful white males like your women's studies classes teach, why the sudden change of heart?

Where do these departments of study that produce really nothing of tangible value get their money from? How were downtrodden minorities, women, homosexuals, etc. etc. suddenly able to force this watershed and wrest control from the "Patriarchy"?

The answer is they haven't. Feminism gets direct funding from the Rockefeller foundation. None of these movements are anti-establishment. Gloria Steinem herself admits that she worked for the CIA! They only serve to empower the establishment, which is population control and socialism.

I think we need a working definition of 'feminism' to continue this discussion. There's feminism at the highly publicized MS magazine level, there's feminism at the classroom level, there's feminism in the home, etc. I hardly think the fact that Steinem worked for the CIA over 45 years ago means that all women should automatically be relegated back to the home lest they further the cause of the 'satanic totalitarians'.

[wum]

There are two views of history you can take: A) everything happens accidently in a meandering kind of way, and wars and revolutions are completely spontaneous like hurricanes or volcanoes, or B) they follow a plan enacted by people who are obsessed with power and control.

For all the people who think that Feminism, as a movement, was able to singledandedly hijack university departments, force their vernacular onto common culture as if they were absolute truths: "sexism" "patriarchy" "oppression", beget a whole trend where the birth rate in all Western nations are falling well past replacement level, and then say that the money they recieve from the benevolent Rockefellers means nothing is beyond naive.

Maybe you also believe the televised fall of the Soviet Union was real, where the live sattelite feed was able to provide us "Russians" who all happened to speak English for the benefit of our viewing audience. :):)

[robyn]

Can you really call movements with over 1000 years of history 'spontaneous'?

[wum]

Originally Posted by robyn

Can you really call movements with over 1000 years of history 'spontaneous'?

woah woah back up

[robyn]

There’s actually significant documentation that women desired options other than prostitute, baby-machine or doormat prior to the 1960s!

[wum]

can't we just keep the status quo

[robyn]

I really don't think it's the status quo anymore, Wummy.

ps - this is my new favorite savethemales article!

http://www.savethemales.ca/000165.html

Nothing screams gaaaaay like Hefner.

[wum]

Originally Posted by robyn

I really don't think it's the status quo anymore, Wummy.

ps - this is my new favorite savethemales article!

http://www.savethemales.ca/000165.html

Nothing screams gaaaaay like Hefner.

compare the rate of divorce and break up of the family with today and yesteryear, and then tell me the "sexual revolution" has been good for society.

[robyn]

Divorce rates have actually remained stable since 1990, but for the sake of argument: As legislation has changed over the last century divorce has become much more accessible, for example the enactment of the 'no-fault' divorce law saw an increase in divorce rates in almost all 50 states in the US. And it's now cheaper and easier then ever to obtain one. You can even do it online!

http://www.rapidlaw.net/divorce.html

[wum]

the real kicker is children out of wedlock and people having too few kids tho

[FMPjunkie]

Originally Posted by wum

compare the rate of divorce and break up of the family with today and yesteryear, and then tell me the "sexual revolution" has been good for society.

right because its much healthier for a family to stay together in an abusive, depressed, destructive state than a more content happier state apart.

[wum]

Stephen said (May 24, 2005):


According to the British Marriage Guidance Council, 80% of all marriages in the UK end after less than 2 years now.

People are subconsciously mind controlled and heavily programmed by films, TV, musc and the Internet and pornography to believe this or that person is right for them and yet they all end up hating each other and the children born are fatherless, and turn to drugs, drink, hooliganism, vandalism and general and rebellious anti-social behaviour all the time.

The Labour Government are completely ineffectual and are just playing their part for their Illuminati Masters in the City of London, New York and Washington DC. The UK in regards to sex before marriage and proper, healthy and stable heterosexual relationships is finished unless the people stop thinkng like Sheeple and Lemmings and change their mind patterns and their perception of this reality and start to change the UK for the better, otherwise all hell will break loose here soon.

(Our London Correspondent)

www.savethemales.ca

[Grapes]

unless the people stop thinkng like Sheeple and Lemmings and change their mind patterns and their perception of this reality and start to change the UK for the better

STOP BEING A FUCKING SHEEP AND THINK LIKE I DO!!!