Boycott Circumcision

[Mangle]

Originally Posted by chickydiver

As a nursing student who has seen far to many uncircumsized penis's which were not well taken care of, I believe it is a benificial procedure.

Again, if they're not washing their penis, that's probably not the only thing they're not washing. Their penises weren't the only gross thing about those guys now, was it?
Some people don't wash their hands after they go to the bathroom; should we start cutting off their hands?

Originally Posted by ebbomega

Fact: Circumcision helps you last longer in the sack.

Originally Posted by dabbler

how is that a fact? and even assuming it was, that would be for only one reason :it doesn't feel as good.

It's because the penis, no longer protected by the foreskin, gets mangled and desensitized by rubbing against everything all the time. They have far less sensation than those who have a complete penis. Hence, they can last longer during intercourse as they don't feel it as much. Their dicks are calloused.

I wonder why we don't remove the "hood" on girls. Surely they deserve a clean clitoris as much as guys deserve a clean shlong. Is Judaism sexist?

[thechix0r]

Originally Posted by Mangle

About the cleanliness thing, my girlfriend has noted that every circumsized guy she's slept with has had a fairly stinky cock. Since circumsized guys think they don't have to clean their penis, they don't. Normal guys actually pay attention to that area, because they have to. Ladies dig the clean penis.

Conversely, condoms are an extra whole lot of no fun.

Maybe it was the men she was choosing, not the fact that they were circumsized because I've found the exact opposite and I find that I doubt the fact that you are has anything to do with if you pride yourself on your hygeine or not. You either keep yourself clean or you don't. All guys I've been with that have been circumsized I find it to be just better. I was with someone who wasn't nad it was fine, but really I wished that he was.

Females who are circumsized, it is also a way different operation and for usually different purposes and those are religious. Women are forced to get it done, where as guys it is not anything that decreases your quality of life. If a women has it done, she has a hard time going to the washroom, having any form of sex and enjoying it, or feeling comfortable. They cut off the clit and sew it right to the point where you have to go pee and then make the hole even smaller so that sex is more painful and makes them feel "sin" when they are having sex. So for you to say it's the same thing, you are far mistaken

[Mangle]

Originally Posted by thechix0r

So for you to say it's the same thing, you are far mistaken

Originally Posted by Mangle

It's comparable because it's an unnecessary removal of parts we're born with for a reason. It's not the same, natch, but it's comparable. It's still genital mutilation.

I'm not far mistaken because I never said it was the same. Where did you get that I said they were the exact same thing? The same would be removing the "hood" because you girls can clean yourselves properly.
It's obviously comparable, though, for the simple fact it doesn't matter what name you put on it, it's all needless genital mutilation.

[Goat]

Originally Posted by sidekick

jesus christ. what is with guys and comparing dicks.

Sometimes we have sword fights.
:)

[Mangle]

Originally Posted by Goat

Sometimes we have sword fights.
:)

*ting*

[Goat]

Quit thinking about my forskin
:|

[Mangle]

Foreskin frenzy on Goat!!!!

[Goat]

This conversation is over.

[Mangle]

Originally Posted by Goat

This conversation is over.

But the frenzy has just begun! Woot!!!

[Prissypants]

Meh...I can't remember what it's like to have a foreskin and I don't feel any emotional scarring from it so what does it matter? It means no more to me now then cutting my fingernails...

[Drafted]

mutilated penis' are for jews

[esoter1c]

Originally Posted by Drafted

mutilated penis' are for jews

:285:

[Mangle]

Originally Posted by Drafted

mutilated penis' are for jews

At least they have an excuse. Religions are weird.

[b0ld]

bleh...... thank god I am cut.... I think foreskin is rather disgusting... the thought as to what can occur and shit with a higher risk of disease doesn't cut the cake for me.

[Mangle]

Originally Posted by b0ld

bleh...... thank god I am cut.... I think foreskin is rather disgusting... the thought as to what can occur and shit with a higher risk of disease doesn't cut the cake for me.

Or...wear a condom and don't stick it in random girls unless they've been tested, foreskin or no foreskin. Safe sex, people. Aids isn't cool.
I thought this was common sense?

[b0ld]

Originally Posted by Mangle

Or...wear a condom and don't stick it in random girls unless they've been tested, foreskin or no foreskin. Safe sex, people. Aids isn't cool.
I thought this was common sense?

ok but the risk of infection even without sex can occur.... doesn't necessarily mean an std that you'd get....

[Skitzo_Style]

this has been a very weird thread.

if you are packing a little extra skin and ya want it snipped off, then do it.

if you are happy with an elephant's trunk, then so be it.

i think the fact that we have the option is something to be happy about, not argue whether it is right or wrong.

[dabbler]

Originally Posted by Skitzo_Style

i think the fact that we have the option is something to be happy about, not argue whether it is right or wrong.

the whole point of this thread is that most people were not given an option.

[Skitzo_Style]

Originally Posted by dabbler

the whole point of this thread is that most people were not given an option.

i believe in an earlier post someone (may have been heffmiester) said that there is a procedure that will allow someone to have foreskin if they wish.

so i believe there is always an option.

[Mangle]

Originally Posted by Skitzo_Style

i believe in an earlier post someone (may have been heffmiester) said that there is a procedure that will allow someone to have foreskin if they wish.
so i believe there is always an option.

I don't think a skin graft from your leg is a realistic option.

Originally Posted by dabbler

the whole point of this thread is that most people were not given an option.

And the fact that it's needless genital mutilation we never seem to question.

[Vitamin-X]

Hey. that's needless genital mutilation that close to 70% of the ladies prefer!

edit: see poll thread

[dabbler]

Originally Posted by Skitzo_Style

i believe in an earlier post someone (may have been heffmiester) said that there is a procedure that will allow someone to have foreskin if they wish.

so i believe there is always an option.

you mean an option to back on something that was already done to you. thats not an "option" really.

and plastic surgery for that costs $$$$$$$$$$$$$$

[Drafted]

Originally Posted by Vitamin-X

Hey. that's needless genital mutilation that close to 70% of the ladies prefer!

edit: see poll thread

and how many of them are circumsized themselves?? i'm sure the tables would turn if they had it done.

[Skitzo_Style]

Originally Posted by dabbler

you mean an option to back on something that was already done to you. thats not an "option" really.

and plastic surgery for that costs $$$$$$$$$$$$$$

still an option.

[Mangle]

Originally Posted by Vitamin-X

Hey. that's needless genital mutilation that close to 70% of the ladies prefer!

Shall we begin a debate on breast implants? Aren't those fantastic? Let's all carve our flesh to the new ideal and hope it never changes!!!

Originally Posted by Skitzo_Style

still an option.

Skin grafts aren't a feasible option. That skin has to come from somewhere.