Go Back   FormKaos: Board > Music Discussion > Simply Music > Other
FAQ Community Arcade Today's Posts Search

Other Indie, pop, rock, metal, punk and all other genres

Reply
 
LinkBack Topic Tools Rate Topic
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Nov 07, 07
sNyx.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
sNyx is just really nicesNyx is just really nicesNyx is just really nicesNyx is just really nicesNyx is just really nicesNyx is just really nicesNyx is just really nice
Radiohead's Inrainbows statistics revealed...

For Radiohead Fans, Does “Free” + “Download” = “Freeload”?

2 out of 5 Downloaders Willing to Pay an Average of $6 for “In Rainbows” Album

U.S. Downloaders Willing to Pay More than International Counterparts

RESTON, VA, November 5, 2007comScore, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOR), a leader in measuring the digital world, today released a study of online sales of “In Rainbows,” a new record album from the band Radiohead. The album’s release has challenged the music industry’s traditional distribution and sales model by allowing consumers to determine the price they are willing to pay for the album, which consumers are able to download at the band’s official site for the album (R A D I O H E A D). Consumers could also choose to purchase the Discbox, which includes a vinyl album, bonus CD, and assortment of other trinkets, at the site for a set price of approximately $80 U.S. The results of the study are based on data obtained from comScore’s worldwide database of 2 million people who have provided comScore with explicit permission to monitor their online behavior.

Approximately 2 out of 5 Downloaders Willing to Pay
During the first 29 days of October, 1.2 million people worldwide visited the “In Rainbows” site, with a significant percentage of visitors ultimately downloading the album. The study showed that 38 percent of global downloaders of the album willingly paid to do so, with the remaining 62 percent choosing to pay nothing. The percent downloading for free in the U.S. (60 percent) is only marginally lower than in the rest of the world (64 percent).

Follow the link for specifics..
For Radiohead Fans, Does “Free” + “Download” = “Freeload”?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Nov 07, 07
Phrenetic's Avatar
brentsadowick.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Phrenetic is a jewel in the roughPhrenetic is a jewel in the roughPhrenetic is a jewel in the roughPhrenetic is a jewel in the rough
wow 1.2 million. Thats Platinum
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Nov 07, 07
Lioness
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
TrixX is a jewel in the roughTrixX is a jewel in the roughTrixX is a jewel in the roughTrixX is a jewel in the roughTrixX is a jewel in the rough
yeah with the discbox they brought in around 1 million just in october they said.

im curious to know how much they receive per album sold through their record company??
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Nov 07, 07
veN veN is offline
Basically, I win.
 
Join Date: May 2003
veN is just really niceveN is just really niceveN is just really niceveN is just really niceveN is just really niceveN is just really nice
I saw something today that said that even though many people freeloaded, that those who DID pay, averaged a donation of $6 or so... And that that spread among ALL downloads would average about $2.50 per download, which is 50% more than the $1.50 that artists receive from their labels per album. So they're still ahead! Especially considering that there were no marketing costs associated with this album.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Nov 07, 07
Lioness
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
TrixX is a jewel in the roughTrixX is a jewel in the roughTrixX is a jewel in the roughTrixX is a jewel in the roughTrixX is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by veN View Post
I saw something today that said that even though many people freeloaded, that those who DID pay, averaged a donation of $6 or so... And that that spread among ALL downloads would average about $2.50 per download, which is 50% more than the $1.50 that artists receive from their labels per album. So they're still ahead! Especially considering that there were no marketing costs associated with this album.
ooooooo. thanks. i had no idea what the price they received per album was from their label!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Forum software by vBulletin
Circa 2000 FNK.CA