|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
break it WAY down..
lululemon clothing is considered "athletic clothing"... do i really need a pair of $100 pants just for the gym? come on it is a tad ridiculous.. i can get a pair of pants at off the wall for more like 70% less the price and still do the same work out at the gym. devils avocate.. i paid that hundred bucks for my pants, but they function more than work out pants. im really curious how much lulu pants are at cost.. i know the fabric is more expensive than your reg fabric, but still.. just curious. |
|
|||
ha! they're much more functional than lulus..at least they're diff colors and have more styles than lulus....and cheaper too!
like i said im not arguing, im wearing lulus as im typing. just dont brainwash the 17 year olds on here that its not considered expensive or else they'll go tell their mommys to buy them stuff that is even more expensive. (seriously..how do moms afford kids nowadays?!) |
|
|||
where in my post did i say things there were to expensive. when i said the lululemon man couldnt afford it without his discount? that was me being angry and rude. not ragging on the price i paid for pants. i drop a fair share of money when i shop. i work hard and i feel i deserve the things i spend my money on. and bev is right. to the average person who makes 8 dollars an hour. a 110 dollar pair of pants is expensive.
Last edited by Pussy*Kat; Mar 07, 06 at 05:50 AM. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
haha gosh, i would hope you'd know me better than to think I would rock into a club in my lulu's. for how much i do wear mine, the price was totally justified and i (L) their free hemming. i dunno, i've always recieved amazing service at the robson st location. |