|
Simply Music All genres, hot artists, track ID and general discussion |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
Starting Production on a Mac
Im on an Intel Core Duo MacBook, and im looking for software that I can start production with. Im looking for something possibly with samples. or something that i can sample out of other tracks or something to that effect.
Help please, i need the names of software, plus pro's and con's. |
|
|||
^
Yes Logic is by far the best, and I like Live the most for time stretching. Logic can be tough to jump into the right off the bat.....I'd say Master Reason first, get some of the fundamentals of sequencing and how to create cool synthesizers right from scratch. Reason isn't fabulous for creating glimmering synths by any stretch of the imagination, but consider it a spring board into Logic, you'll find the learning curve less steap and less frustrating. |
|
|||
regarding Ben's post:
Good notes. Yeah definately, a lot of the software I own I bought, its a hell of a lot less time consuming to have the actual CD, as opposed to a crack which A.)You could loose or delete by accident and B.)Causing navagational issues w/ the program once or if you get it going. If cost is a main concern, you can get Pro Tools w/ some TDM plug ins as well....completely different approach, but when I was talking to Dogzilla about production, he likes Pro Tools LE, simply for the simplicity of the interface, and its what he's used to as well. Ultimately its also a matter of what is the best fit for you....for some people its Cubase, some people its Pro Tools, for me it's Logic. Might be a good idea to go to McQuade or Tom Lee and ask for a demo of a program, I'm sure they'd be able to do that. (There are also free versions of Pro Tools out there as well, they only have 8 track limit, but there are ways of getting around that.) |
|
|||
mmhm. ya i was just looking to try out a few copies of programs before splurging on it without knowing, made that mistake with PC when i bought Ableton.
But thanks. More input from others as well please, mostly from peopel that know mac's if possible |
|
|||
If Macs are so great... why do major high-tech companies use PCs exclusivly?
Well I'll tell you. That whole "Macs are better for multimedia work" argument would have washed 10 years ago. But that is not the case anymore. You don't get anything "extra" out of producing from a Mac. You just spend more money on a pretty toy. While the o/s doesn't crash as much (also a problem that's become less with real computers), they have other problems like repetative hardware failiure. And you can only buy Mac parts to replace them. Buy something that works better than it looks. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
^ there's no comparison...MAC's for audio are the pinacle of computing and signal processing. Simply because they are more effective at utilizing resources...PC's were programmed in order to handle DOS and the Windows OS together, where as MAC has a completely dedicated OS for data processing. Its designed to handle hi end graphics, and audio....I don't know what "hi tech" companies you're talking about, but every enterprise which uses professional graphic design, and audio engineering, have mainly all macs...
Emagic never continued programming Logic for PC based on that principal, and since Apple bought them out, Logic has gotten better and better...since it's now industry standard for the serious producer, I think they kind of have an idea as far as what systems will power their software the best..... |
|
|||
Quote:
You know what... rfmf, say what ever helps you sleep and night, and think you have the upper hand advantage Mac users. |
|
|||
your whole arguement is that they're not "better" for audio production - someone counters that they are and then you go and list 4 companies that have absolutey nothig to do with audio production - say they don't use macs and that's supposed to prove PC's superiority at audio production?
wow. |