|
Simply Music All genres, hot artists, track ID and general discussion |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
Well, I posted this question on three boards, had 65 downloads of the file, and got a total of four people trying to guess what synth did what. I'm going to take that to mean that many people listened, could not tell the difference, and were afraid to guess lest it make them look dumb. Last time one of these blind tests came up on Analogue Heaven, I was totally taken in, and got all my answers wrong, so I had to requestion my beliefs. I'm still 100% in love with analogue, but I don't argue the sound anymore.
Without futher ado, the synths used in http://mux.ca/temp/bass.wav are, in order: 1. Waldorf Pulse Plus - 3 VCO analogue synth 2. ReFX "Beast" - 2 VCO softsynth 3. NI FM7 - FM-synthesis softsynth 4. Roland SH-101 - 1 VCO analogue synth There you have it, folks - the moral of this story (as is the moral to so many stories), "It's not how big your hook is, it's how you wiggle your worm". Fuck buying a TR-909 and a TB-303 - there's a whole world of instruments out there, go out and make your own sound. |
|
|||
No Doubt, I was way way off. I can't beleive that the sh-101 sounds like that, unbeleivable.
Your right, the 909 and 303 have been done to death, I meant something else like using a Quasimidi Polymorph and a Jomox X-Base or something. For the most part I knew the first sample was analog, it had to be and sounded it big time, the rest was just a guess, I didn't care that much. I don't pretend to understand digital artists, the massive changes we are experiencing will eventually drown out analog completely, so enjoy it while it lasts. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
It's really only when you add a shitload of overdrive and distortion to the SH-101, and push the filter resonance up way high that it screams. Bass patches on it aren't so much 'awesome and huge' as they are 'utilitarian and very punchy'. Often, folks buy SH-101's, then sell them again a month later. Then later on, they realize that the best dance music basses are utilitarian and punchy, then realize that their softsynths just don't do that simple noise as well as the SH-101, then they buy one again. :) Then they sing the praises of the SH-101 on the message boards, a neophyte picks up on it, and the cycle begins anew. I'm just fading out of the "singing the praises" phase now. :) I am still totally in love with mine, I just don't feel the need to tell everyone as often anymore... |
|
|||
Otaku~Geek
Quote:
I never actually owned the Sh-101, however I did own an MC-202 (same thing basically) which I sold a few years ago. I definitely miss the chunky sounds that came out of that little box and the looks of awe and wonder when I showed my friends. I remember when Eminem put out that song "feels so empty with out me," well I was able to recreate the bass and the drums using my Tr-606 and MC-202, and a dinsync plug, big fun :) Fortunately, I laid down some pretty sic* 202 basslines on my own tracks before I sold it. I've noticed that a lot of house musicians are using the 101/202 sound, you hear a lot of these filter breakdown where its all 101 treble and it just sounds so awesome, that is my big push to buying another 101/202, the abilty to get clean analog filter breakdowns is appalling. Someday soon, I will realease my tracks, I will get some R.E.S.P.E.C.T. Timeless. Peace N8 |