Go Back   FormKaos: Board > Music Discussion > Simply Music
FAQ Community Arcade Today's Posts Search

Simply Music All genres, hot artists, track ID and general discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Topic Tools Rate Topic
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
runs tings
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
firestar is on a distinguished road
Anyone know mastering??

I can't seem to get it right for the life of me so I'm looking to have a mix mastered for me. All you people with mastering experience, i'm looking your way here.. I'm willing to pay you to get this thing finished for me.

Anyone interested?

Cheers :D
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
dabbler's Avatar
Art Is Resistance
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
dabbler is a jewel in the roughdabbler is a jewel in the roughdabbler is a jewel in the roughdabbler is a jewel in the rough
you just need like post production done on a mix? i could do it for you
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
The.House.Brothers
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
~god~ is an unknown quantity at this point
mastering is not something you get good at overnight.

I've been practicing for well over a year now, and i still don't concider myself to be "good" (well compared to most of the pros). mastering comes off as a second nature to some of those guys.

Hook it up and i'd do it for you. how long iis it?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
dabbler's Avatar
Art Is Resistance
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
dabbler is a jewel in the roughdabbler is a jewel in the roughdabbler is a jewel in the roughdabbler is a jewel in the rough
i'm not sure that "mastering" is really what he needs. just post prod on a mix (gaining, editing, overall eq maybe, and cutting it into tracks.)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
runs tings
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
firestar is on a distinguished road
yeah pretty much, what's the difference then, between post prod and mastering.. I thought it was the same thing..

Wow, noobielicious.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
mux mux is offline
in techno veritas
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
mux is an unknown quantity at this point
Yeah, mastering on a mix? All those tracks are already mastered... all you need is a little light compression and limiting, to get rid of any changes in volume between tracks.

If you're having problems, it's probably because you're trying too hard. Back *way* off on all your settings. Less is more, those tracks already sound great on their own.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
The.House.Brothers
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
~god~ is an unknown quantity at this point
when he said mastering I just assumed he meant a "track". lol i thought he needed help to mix and master the track.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
runs tings
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
firestar is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mux
Yeah, mastering on a mix? All those tracks are already mastered... all you need is a little light compression and limiting, to get rid of any changes in volume between tracks.

If you're having problems, it's probably because you're trying too hard. Back *way* off on all your settings. Less is more, those tracks already sound great on their own.

Oh yeah I know, I guess I shouldn't have used to work mastering then, that's all. Yeah, that's exactly what I need, some are too loud, some are too thin, too bassey and so on..

I tried f'ing with the eqs but what i'm getting is not to my liking at all..

See, i'm doing a track by track mix (mix record one with record two, stop recording, then mix track two with track three, stop recording, and so on) All the levels on each one of these 'one track mixes' are not the same as the others.. that's all.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
Well, that's your opinion
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Mangle will become famous soon enough
It's a dying art. There are really only a handful of people on the planet who truly understand it.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
Avana
Guest
 
Everytime I hit new posts and see this thread, I think it says masturbating and not mastering. I keep doing double and triple takes! :(
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
blau
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
dj_soo is just really nicedj_soo is just really nicedj_soo is just really nicedj_soo is just really nicedj_soo is just really nicedj_soo is just really nice
what program are you using for recording?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
slap the funk
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
deliverance is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassline!
Oh yeah I know, I guess I shouldn't have used to work mastering then, that's all. Yeah, that's exactly what I need, some are too loud, some are too thin, too bassey and so on..

I tried f'ing with the eqs but what i'm getting is not to my liking at all..

See, i'm doing a track by track mix (mix record one with record two, stop recording, then mix track two with track three, stop recording, and so on) All the levels on each one of these 'one track mixes' are not the same as the others.. that's all.

An easy place to start is making sure that when recording your levels match. it goes a long way to save time later.

Other than that just normalize the mix, and like mux said, a little compression and limiting and you're done.

good luck!
cheers
J
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
runs tings
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
firestar is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by deliverance
An easy place to start is making sure that when recording your levels match. it goes a long way to save time later.

Other than that just normalize the mix, and like mux said, a little compression and limiting and you're done.

good luck!
cheers
J
I just had a thought.. once I merge all these tracks together, I can compress/limit/eq the whole mix at once right? I don't have to do all that for each track? I mean, there's a some pretty big differences in volume from the start to the end of the mix.. some tracks are a lot louder than others..
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
blau
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
dj_soo is just really nicedj_soo is just really nicedj_soo is just really nicedj_soo is just really nicedj_soo is just really nicedj_soo is just really nice
Quote:
See, i'm doing a track by track mix (mix record one with record two, stop recording, then mix track two with track three, stop recording, and so on) All the levels on each one of these 'one track mixes' are not the same as the others.. that's all.
that's kinda cheesy no? :) might as well just piece the mix together in Acid or something... not trying to come down on you or anything as I do use edits for some of my mixes, but I still record like 3 or 4 takes live, take the best one and fix the small areas that might be slightly off...
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
slap the funk
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
deliverance is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by mofo-x
that's kinda cheesy no? :) might as well just piece the mix together in Acid or something... not trying to come down on you or anything as I do use edits for some of my mixes, but I still record like 3 or 4 takes live, take the best one and fix the small areas that might be slightly off...

yeah I was thinking the same thing. kinda loses the "flow" the way you're doin it I would think. not trying to come down on ya either but I would give it a shot like how he ^^ said.

cheers
J
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
The.House.Brothers
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
~god~ is an unknown quantity at this point
I just mix the whole thing live and record on protools.
then i edit/audiosuite the fuck out of it.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
dabbler's Avatar
Art Is Resistance
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
dabbler is a jewel in the roughdabbler is a jewel in the roughdabbler is a jewel in the roughdabbler is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by deliverance
An easy place to start is making sure that when recording your levels match. it goes a long way to save time later.

Other than that just normalize the mix, and like mux said, a little compression and limiting and you're done.

good luck!
cheers
J
lots more can be done than just that.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
_________________________
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Chewy has a spectacular aura aboutChewy has a spectacular aura aboutChewy has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~god~
I just mix the whole thing live and record on protools.
then i edit/audiosuite the fuck out of it.

real men mix it all at once
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
The.House.Brothers
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
~god~ is an unknown quantity at this point
well in my demo's, i don't just mix kiddo. :)
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
runs tings
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
firestar is on a distinguished road
I usually do live mixes, every other mix I've ever recorded has been live. I just heard of this idea and decided to try it out, it doesn't hurt the flow of the mix if you do it right.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
woodnsoo.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Wood has a spectacular aura aboutWood has a spectacular aura aboutWood has a spectacular aura about
why do you stop in between each track exactly? i do punch ins when i record a mix if i botch up a transition... but if you nail it would you not just keep going on with the next one?

the only post-production i usually do on mixes is to go in & correct the levels on certain tracks that come through lower in volume than the others. Then some moderate limiting on the whole file. I do all the EQing on the fly, can't be bothered to fuck with it in post. If there's a situation where the Eqs really need attention, i'll go back & punch in the mix, adjusting the EQs on my mixer accordingly.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Jan 23, 06
runs tings
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
firestar is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wood
why do you stop in between each track exactly? i do punch ins when i record a mix if i botch up a transition... but if you nail it would you not just keep going on with the next one?

the only post-production i usually do on mixes is to go in & correct the levels on certain tracks that come through lower in volume than the others. Then some moderate limiting on the whole file. I do all the EQing on the fly, can't be bothered to fuck with it in post. If there's a situation where the Eqs really need attention, i'll go back & punch in the mix, adjusting the EQs on my mixer accordingly.
A couple of the mixes are 3-4 tracks long, I did keep going! :D I just thought i'd try doing it this way as all of the mixes i've recorded previously have been live from start to finish! Just trying something new, that's all :)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:26 AM.


Forum software by vBulletin
Circa 2000 FNK.CA