nucks/canes 7pm sportsnet (FRI)

omega_image · #1 (**permalink**) Dec 07, 06

at least i think its on sportsnet.

i'm predicting a huge game. sure i might be really fucking wrong, but i could be amazingly right.

i'm saying 6+ goals scored in this game. nucks 4-3 in ot/so

dave mcnasty · #2 (**permalink**) Dec 07, 06

10-0 carolina

but a few good chances from the canucks!!1

Goodfellow · #3 (**permalink**) Dec 07, 06

judgin by the way Canes played Edm.. Im gunna say low scoring.

2-1 nucks

just because I can't bare to predict another team to win.

firestar · #4 (**permalink**) Dec 07, 06

^^ heheh

I say the trend continues.

3-0 Canes.

Pennywise · #5 (**permalink**) Dec 07, 06

3-1 canes

but,
go canucks go!

mapleleaf4ever · #6 (**permalink**) Dec 07, 06

*attempts to hold breath*

esoter1c · #7 (**permalink**) Dec 07, 06

We had the team and not the goalie.

Now we got the goalie.........

4-1 canes.

KenJi · #8 (**permalink**) Dec 07, 06

I'll go against all of you except adam and say 4-2 Canucks. Basically Canucks have no choice but to play as hard as they can now with that embarassing loss to edmonton still in their heads hopefully it will give the nucks a kick start.

A-BOMB · #9 (**permalink**) Dec 07, 06

Someone nuke GM Place please

KenJi · #10 (**permalink**) Dec 07, 06

^ than our team would have to either build a new arena or move away.

How about someone nukes nonis's house instead.

omega_image · #11 (**permalink**) Dec 08, 06

well according to some believers, GM place is the problem - they think that the cambie st. bridge takes all of the good energy away from gm place.

esoter1c · #12 (**permalink**) Dec 08, 06

Keslers gonna do his spinorama and score tonight.

:285:

omega_image · #13 (**permalink**) Dec 08, 06

damnit, and i was waiting for a

'NOT'

esoter1c · #14 (**permalink**) Dec 08, 06

2-0 nucks after 2.

mapleleaf4ever · #15 (**permalink**) Dec 08, 06

LET'S GO CANUCKS!!!

Please?!

esoter1c · #16 (**permalink**) Dec 08, 06

3-0 :149:

Goodfellow · #17 (**permalink**) Dec 09, 06

LOL@ all you haters that predicted the canucks to lose..

omega_image · #18 (**permalink**) Dec 09, 06

read my prediction (1st post)

4-3 nucks in ot/so

BAM!

Bobby_T · #19 (**permalink**) Dec 09, 06

Good call adam....i can't believe we scored 4 goals!

Antenna_Boy · #20 (**permalink**) Dec 09, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3507321C

We had the team and not the goalie.

Now we got the goalie.........

4-1 canes.

SUCK IT 3507321C!!!.!!>!>!!
hahhaha, jk =)
btw, the canes came close to winning*

esoter1c · #21 (**permalink**) Dec 09, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by omega_image

read my prediction (1st post)

4-3 nucks in ot/so

BAM!

Damn you coulda made some money with that one.

I am still amazed we won.

I really want to be amazed today against Flames.

Goodfellow · #22 (**permalink**) Dec 09, 06

why ^ ?

Canes had lost 4/5 goin into that game, and were probably tired from the roadtrip. Canucks have been at home for a while.

Antenna_Boy · #23 (**permalink**) Dec 09, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goodfellow

why ^ ?

Canes had lost 4/5 goin into that game, and were probably tired from the roadtrip. Canucks have been at home for a while.

I agree..you could tell they were tired because the guy who took the penalty shot barely had any legs under him...(it's the morning and I can't think of any names right now)

omega_image · #24 (**permalink**) Dec 09, 06

how do you forget eric staal's name?

lol but yes, sports action money was taken.

Antenna_Boy · #25 (**permalink**) Dec 09, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by omega_image

how do you forget eric staal's name?

lol but yes, sports action money was taken.

I tell you how I forgot his name...I had two final exams in a row and my mind was calculating statistical formulas such as p-value and ANOVA tables :(