|
|||||||
| Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
Dec 11, 04
|
|||
|
|||
|
New govt program forcefully drugs pregnant women
Body: Mandatory mental health screening program would dose pregnant women with prescription drugs that cause birth defects
News Target | December 2, 2004 Bureaucrats in Chicago are currently discussing a proposal to require the mental health screening of all pregnant women and children up to the age of 18 years old. The purported mission of the program is to protect the health of the public by diagnosing mental disorders before they become full blown problems -- but in reality, as we've seen from similar programs in the past, the real mission is to diagnose people with fictitious brain diseases and behavioral disorders, then dose them with highly toxic prescription drugs that not only generate profits for pharmaceutical companies, but also for the psychiatrists who prescribe them. What's especially frightening about this program is that it may include the dosing of pregnant women with prescription drugs that we now know increase the risk of birth defects. We also know from clinical trials and experiments involving mice that children who grow up on antidepressant drugs have a much higher risk of being depressed as adults whether or not they continue taking those drugs. In other words, it's not enough that as a nation we misdiagnose childhood hyperactivity caused by sugar consumption as being a brain chemistry imbalance and then dose all those children with Ritalin, it seems that we also want to start dosing pregnant women as well. Who's next? Are we going to dose all men under the age of 30? Are we going to require the mental health screening of all elderly people, and start dosing everyone over the age of 65 with brain altering drugs too? There seems to be no limit to how far the highly corrupt psychiatry community and prescription drug companies will carry this to exert control over the population and generate obscene profits. And the truth is that anyone can be diagnosed with a mental disorder given sufficient creativity on the part of the psychiatrists. If a person is too creative and excited, they have Attention Deficit Disorder. If they're not creative enough, they have a reading disorder. And if they get nervous while being observed by the psychiatrist, they obviously have a social anxiety disorder. See? It doesn't take much to invent behavioral disorders and then come up with fraudulently marketed drugs that claim to mask symptoms of those disorders. Welcome to Insane USA, where the mission of the pharmaceutical industry seems to be: let's put as many people as possible on as many brain altering drugs as possible. And, if you've noticed, the whole idea of diagnosing disease has shifted over the last ten years from diseases that had measurable symptoms (such as high cholesterol, high blood pressure or cancer tumors) to diseases that are largely subjective and have no objective definition. There is no definition of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) that can be confirmed by a lab test. It is a completely fictitious disease that has literally no verifiable biochemistry or physiology. It's simply a matter of one psychiatrist walking in, pointing at a child and saying "Oh, he has a disorder -- let's put him on drugs!" And ignorant parents tend to go right along with it because they haven't done the math on drugs, and they're not aware of the dangerous side effects of these toxic prescriptions. What we really need in this country are laws that ban dosing children with mind-altering drugs. If anything, our children need to be set free from the chemical prisons erected by psychiatrists, over-zealous school administrators and, of course, pharmaceutical companies. http://www.newstarget.com/002566.html Last edited by maztraz; Dec 12, 04 at 06:18 AM. 
|
|
Dec 11, 04
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If you want more info on medication programing... http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...1/140125.shtml http://www.weholdthesetruths.org/Civ...-childrenl.htm http://www.infowars.com/articles/bra..._amendment.htm http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=41606 Last edited by maztraz; Dec 12, 04 at 06:17 AM.
|
|
Dec 11, 04
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Everyone are concerned by medical industries, so before saying its boring, read the info and post your own critics and opinion... It won't help anyone if your just there complaning on any source of information.
|
|
Dec 12, 04
|
|||
|
|||
|
The President's New Freedom Commision on Mental Health was organized in June 2002, and met until April of 2003 when it gave a Final Report to the President. The commision was then disolved.
If you are interested in the details of this bill I recommend you read through the Executive Summary and draw your conclusions from there. All 4 of those sources aren't exactly what I'd call "reliable". If this was actually going to happen CNN would be over that like a dirty shirt. You can read the executive summary of the report HERE NOWHERE in this report does it suggest manditory medication for pregnant women or children. Screening is only recommended for pregnant women of re-occuring mental health problems. Quote:
The PR rep for the AAPS (note that she is just the Meida Representative, and has no medical background), Kathryn Serkes, is speculating that this is what the money in the grant blocks will be used for. The bill suggests screening for children and pregnant women to prevent re-occuring mental health problems, the solution that is recommended by the bill is that a nurse (it is reinforced that it be a trained nurse and not a paraprofessional) vist the homes of high-risk pregnant women during the first year of the child's life. Again, if you are interested in the details of this bill I recommend you read through the Executive Summary and draw your conclusions from there.
Last edited by thebobman; Dec 12, 04 at 04:24 AM.
|
|
Dec 12, 04
|
|||
|
|||
|
Okay...Here it is, you will find the necesairy info on this site:
http://www.newstarget.com/002566.html
|
|
Dec 12, 04
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
Dec 12, 04
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This is still recent news, that needs much more evidence for to be proven publicly, indeed...Its a article that needs to be approached a way or other, there is all ready children with mind-altering drugs what do you need more? And the question on public evidence will still stay how will it be presented to citizens (depending your source information of course)??? http://www.exega.com/adhd/article290.htm http://www.parapolitics.info/phorum...=33&i=266&t=266
|
|
Dec 13, 04
|
|||
|
|||
|
A check of the REST of the 'newstarget' articles shows that it has a very heavy slant against the pharmaceutical industry. It's a bit sensationalist, so take it with a big big grain of salt. There are some good points here and there, but they're almost outweighed by the selective articles.
Here's a review of what message you'll get reading the article titles: Man-made things are really bad. Things from nature are really good. In reality, it works both ways.
|
|
Dec 13, 04
|
|||
|
|||
|
Natural products don't always work for everything nor everyone, though.
It's good for people to try them out, but the people who sell natural products obviously need to make money too. So some will push things on people that cannot and will not help their problems, or give them too much, etc. Basically it comes down to doing your own research as much as possible and questioning your doctor about the medications. If he can't/won't tell you why he chose something, maybe look for a new one who takes more interest in helping you understand what he's giving you.
|
|
Dec 13, 04
|
|||
|
|||
|
^Herbal medication can be as much effective and a good treatment, it all depens on how the treatment is done and depending on what the person has...
Don't you wonder why there is thousand of scientifics every year that go into nature and look for new miracle treatments?Simply cause nature has much more to offer, depending all how you use it of course! Not all doctors use mosts of the herbal treatments, cause you need alot of knowledge and it is much less of a benefit financiely, I honestly believe much more in Nature then the pharmaceutical industry! Maybe I am rong, maybe not, but personaly, when you buy a box of pills incredibly expensive(That is more expensive every year) and you fall on treatments that you feel had no effects on you, honestly its a total wastes of money there is so many junky shit out there!
|
|
Dec 13, 04
|
||||
|
||||
|
most pharmaceutical drugs are based on based on products already found in nature, except they just extract the active ingredient and then mass produce it. how can a synthetic copy be as good as the original thing? how can something made in a lab be as good for our bodies as something that humans have been using for thousands of years?
|
|
Dec 13, 04
|
|||
|
|||
|
Neither are better, just different.
All of them are pretty much foreign agents altering your body and mind in various ways. when you look at it this way, you don't focus on the source as much because almost all of it is external stuff put in the body. So yeah. Use what works. Learn why or why it doesn't. ;)
|
