richard park what - Page 2

Antenna_Boy · #26 (**permalink**) Oct 18, 05

Quote:

Originally Posted by KenJi

^ weak thread....

its way to early to make threads like that. You can praise someone for being hot and all, but you can't complain about bertuzzi 6 games into a season..

well i guess u can, cause u just did.

so let's complain about Dan Cloutier instead hahaha.

Antenna_Boy · #27 (**permalink**) Dec 29, 05

What a guy! Breaks through and scores the game winner on home ice against the Preds in the third period =)

Grapes · #28 (**permalink**) Dec 29, 05

First goal in 18 games if I'm not mistaken?

KenJi · #29 (**permalink**) Dec 30, 05

^ it was a night of breaking the slumps for Ohlund and the Richard Park nation and the Canucks as well.

firestar · #30 (**permalink**) Jan 06, 06

I say, move park to the first line. I know i know, he's small, but imagine Nassi & Park together, fuck they'd skate circles around players, and have that big stump bert in front of the net. I have no idea why they haven't thought about this with all the trouble they've been having.. at the start of the season when they did put park on the first line, he scored a few goals, which is more than I can say for Morrison right now..

Antenna_Boy · #31 (**permalink**) Jan 06, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by bassline!

I say, move park to the first line. I know i know, he's small, but imagine Nassi & Park together, fuck they'd skate circles around players, and have that big stump bert in front of the net. I have no idea why they haven't thought about this with all the trouble they've been having.. at the start of the season when they did put park on the first line, he scored a few goals, which is more than I can say for Morrison right now..

turn Bert into a centerman???

firestar · #32 (**permalink**) Jan 06, 06

Yep! Or make nassi the center and move bert to the wing. Couldn't hurt! Can't really get much worse than they've been playing.. that line would have tons of speed on the wings and a big huge mofo'n tree up the middle.. why wouldn't that work?

Antenna_Boy · #33 (**permalink**) Jan 06, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by bassline!

Yep! Or make nassi the center and move bert to the wing. Couldn't hurt! Can't really get much worse than they've been playing.. that line would have tons of speed on the wings and a big huge mofo'n tree up the middle.. why wouldn't that work?

How about put pairing Nazzy with the Sedin Twins on the Number 1 line and putting Bert/carter and morrison on Number2 line? So far Morrison is producing more than Park, so he gets more credit. But I think carter could help out morrison some. Park should be with Cookie and Linden.

KenJi · #34 (**permalink**) Jan 06, 06

Bert as a center is fine but Naslund as a center I just can't see it. Yes he skates well, but in terms of checking people he isn't that great at all. Not big. more finesse. He's a franchise winger.

Bert is a big mobile forward, who can skate and hit well if he wants to, also if the faceoff drop is a draw he can hold the opposing center where as I think Naslund would easily get overpowerd, as does Morrison.

Hendrik is alot stronger this season hence his faceoff % is the best on the Canucks if I am not mistaken. I believe he put on some muscles in the off season as did Daniel.

firestar · #35 (**permalink**) Jan 07, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antenna_Boy

How about put pairing Nazzy with the Sedin Twins on the Number 1 line and putting Bert/carter and morrison on Number2 line? So far Morrison is producing more than Park, so he gets more credit. But I think carter could help out morrison some. Park should be with Cookie and Linden.

Cmon dude, we all know the only reason Morrison has more points than say, Park, is because he's on the first line. Nassi with the sedins would be fast, but weak, they need atleast one big fucking dude on that line, to even out the size. I don't know why you think Park should be on a checking line!? Look how fast that guy is! That's the last place I'd have that guy! Cooke and Linden would just slow park down.. seriously, Park DOES have first line potential.

KenJi · #36 (**permalink**) Jan 07, 06

Park is second line material not first. Good wrist shot, and good speed when he skates, but the rest I just don't see him fit for the top line.

KenJi · #37 (**permalink**) Jan 07, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by bassline!

Cmon dude, we all know the only reason Morrison has more points than say, Park, is because he's on the first line. Nassi with the sedins would be fast, but weak, they need atleast one big fucking dude on that line, to even out the size. I don't know why you think Park should be on a checking line!? Look how fast that guy is! That's the last place I'd have that guy! Cooke and Linden would just slow park down.. seriously, Park DOES have first line potential.

I actually think Naslund with the Sedins might not be such a bad idea. Hendrik and Daniel are really good at cycling the puck. Hendrik is pretty good on faceoff's too which morrison is not. Hence all the chances we could have with a faceoff in the oppositions zone most are a waste of a chance. Naslund knows how to open and would be the perfect go to guy.

They don't need a big guy this season they are both stronger. You can see i when they are on the boards how they cycle the puck well and shield the puck

firestar · #38 (**permalink**) Jan 07, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by KenJi

I actually think Naslund with the Sedins might not be such a bad idea. Hendrik and Daniel are really good at cycling the puck. Hendrik is pretty good on faceoff's too which morrison is not. Hence all the chances we could have with a faceoff in the oppositions zone most are a waste of a chance. Naslund knows how to open and would be the perfect go to guy.

They don't need a big guy this season they are both stronger. You can see i when they are on the boards how they cycle the puck well and shield the puck

True dat, But see, bert is one of the best in the league in front of net. Having park and nazzi doing laps around these guys, think about how many more shots would come in from the circles and the slot, and guess who's there to screen the crap out of the goalie, cause a ruckus in the crease, and bat n those garbage goals.

I think of the sedins and nassi say, against Calgary. Honestly dude, they'd get outworked. Do you think the sedin line would work better with morrison or carter? I say try carter on the 3rd line, send morrison to the second line, get get park up there. I have a lot of faith in him I guess.

Goodfellow · #39 (**permalink**) Jan 07, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by KenJi

I actually think Naslund with the Sedins might not be such a bad idea. Hendrik and Daniel are really good at cycling the puck. Hendrik is pretty good on faceoff's too which morrison is not. Hence all the chances we could have with a faceoff in the oppositions zone most are a waste of a chance. Naslund knows how to open and would be the perfect go to guy.

They don't need a big guy this season they are both stronger. You can see i when they are on the boards how they cycle the puck well and shield the puck

Don't mess with the sedin line, Carter is perfect for them.. he just crashes the net and they cycle the puck around until there's an opening to give it to him. Naslund would be working the boards and stuff and he just wouldn't do anything on that line. He's a sniper not a crash n bang centre.

but I always thought Park should be on the first line instead of Morrison. At least try him out for a while, see how he does.. I think he'd score a lot more goals than morrison up there. for fucks sakes morrison has no goal scoring talent AT ALL , I honestly think I could score more goals than him on that line lol he misses soooo many chances, it's like he freezes up or something

Antenna_Boy · #40 (**permalink**) Jan 07, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodFlow

Don't mess with the sedin line, Carter is perfect for them.. he just crashes the net and they cycle the puck around until there's an opening to give it to him. Naslund would be working the boards and stuff and he just wouldn't do anything on that line. He's a sniper not a crash n bang centre.

but I always thought Park should be on the first line instead of Morrison. At least try him out for a while, see how he does.. I think he'd score a lot more goals than morrison up there. for fucks sakes morrison has no goal scoring talent AT ALL , I honestly think I could score more goals than him on that line lol he misses soooo many chances, it's like he freezes up or something

you may be able to score more goals by just standing in front of the net I agree :mexitoke: :) heheh

dave mcnasty · #41 (**permalink**) Jan 07, 06

Park is fast and shit but he just doesnt have the finish ....kind of like kesler.....they're both good but they dont have the scoring ability that they need to have to be on the first line

KenJi · #42 (**permalink**) Jan 07, 06

Quote:

Originally Posted by McNasty

Park is fast and shit but he just doesnt have the finish ....kind of like kesler.....they're both good but they dont have the scoring ability that they need to have to be on the first line

Thats exactly it. Yes Park did score alot at the beginning but he was hot. He isn't known to be a scorer. Even though he was on Minnesota so thats probably a given haha.

Morrison actually used to be able to score he's had 20+ goals twice. I think 25 or 27 in 2002.

He just doesn't shoot anymore. If he shot more Naslund and Bertuzzi could have more goals to via a rebound or loose puck in front of the net.

I kinda see what your saying Goodflow but I think the thing is if Naslund were with the Sedins he wouldn't be in front of the net, but Naslund knows where to go to use his sniper wrist shot.

He's best from around the two faceoff circles. I think the Sedins could get it to Naslund and he can score. Naslund can score with anyone I swear.