BRAINSTORM: WHY DOES j0rd HAET RAWB? - Page 2

cubed · #26 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by rawb

OKAY LETS HAVE A CONSTRUCTIVE DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS

A FEW IDEAS:

1) RE: THREADS BECOMING 'TALK ABOUT RAWB' THREADS

I CAN SEE YOUR POINT, BUT REALLY NOBODY IS BEING FORCED TO RESPOND TO MY POSTS. IF THREADS ARE BECOMING 'RAWB FOCUSED' ISNT THAT THE FAULT OF PEOPLE WHO CONTINUE RAWB RELATED THREADS? I MEAN, NOBODY IS MAKING ANYBODY TALK ABOUT ANYTHING. SOMETIMES I POST AND NOBODY REPLIES. HIT OR MISS.

2) MY CURRENT KARMA IS 9 POINTS, THAT MEANS IN ABOUT 24 HOURS I HAVE RECIEVED 29 POSITIVE REVIEWS OF MY POSTS, AND 4 BAD ONES (4x20) FROM YOU AND YOUR ALT. BY YOUR SYSTEM, IT SEEMS PEOPLE LIKE MY POSTS.

I UNDERSTAND YOU DONT LIKE MY POSTS, IM FINE WITH THAT, I REALLY THINK SOME PEOPLE ARE STUPID AND INANE TOO. IS IT RIGHT TO GIVE PEOPLE THE OPTION TO VOTE POSTS UP AND DOWN, AND THEN WHEN PEOPLE DONT VOTE HOW YOU WOULD LIKE, GO AGAINST THEIR WISHES AND VOTE PEOPLE DOWN ANYWAYS?

WHY HAVE A VOTING SYSTEM IF YOU ONLY RESPECT POST RATINGS THAT YOU AGREE WITH?

3) IF YOU REALLY, ABSOLUTELY THINK IM 'RUINING THE BOARD' OR WHATEVER, JUST LET ME KNOW AND ILL LEAVE. I DONT KNOW WHAT YOUR IDEA IS FOR FNK IS BUT HEY, ITS YOUR BOARD (OR YOU ACT LIKE IT) AND YOU PAY THE BILLS, DO WHAT YOU WANT. YOU'RE THE ONE BEING A TOTAL VAGINA ABOUT SOME POSTS.

co-signed.

j3rk · #27 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by rawb

OKAY LETS HAVE A CONSTRUCTIVE DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS

A FEW IDEAS:

1) RE: THREADS BECOMING 'TALK ABOUT RAWB' THREADS

I CAN SEE YOUR POINT, BUT REALLY NOBODY IS BEING FORCED TO RESPOND TO MY POSTS. IF THREADS ARE BECOMING 'RAWB FOCUSED' ISNT THAT THE FAULT OF PEOPLE WHO CONTINUE RAWB RELATED THREADS? I MEAN, NOBODY IS MAKING ANYBODY TALK ABOUT ANYTHING. SOMETIMES I POST AND NOBODY REPLIES. HIT OR MISS.

2) MY CURRENT KARMA IS 9 POINTS, THAT MEANS IN ABOUT 24 HOURS I HAVE RECIEVED 29 POSITIVE REVIEWS OF MY POSTS, AND 4 BAD ONES (4x20) FROM YOU AND YOUR ALT. BY YOUR SYSTEM, IT SEEMS PEOPLE LIKE MY POSTS.

I UNDERSTAND YOU DONT LIKE MY POSTS, IM FINE WITH THAT, I REALLY THINK SOME PEOPLE ARE STUPID AND INANE TOO. IS IT RIGHT TO GIVE PEOPLE THE OPTION TO VOTE POSTS UP AND DOWN, AND THEN WHEN PEOPLE DONT VOTE HOW YOU WOULD LIKE, GO AGAINST THEIR WISHES AND VOTE PEOPLE DOWN ANYWAYS?

WHY HAVE A VOTING SYSTEM IF YOU ONLY RESPECT POST RATINGS THAT YOU AGREE WITH?

3) IF YOU REALLY, ABSOLUTELY THINK IM 'RUINING THE BOARD' OR WHATEVER, JUST LET ME KNOW AND ILL LEAVE. I DONT KNOW WHAT YOUR IDEA IS FOR FNK IS BUT HEY, ITS YOUR BOARD (OR YOU ACT LIKE IT) AND YOU PAY THE BILLS, DO WHAT YOU WANT. YOU'RE THE ONE BEING A TOTAL VAGINA ABOUT SOME POSTS.

I enjoy your posts actually. 90% of them make me laugh. Even the ones i vote down. But when i feel they are not constructive or will derail a thread, I vote them down.

Just keep it in the sh!t show.

cubed · #28 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by j0rd

you guys can have the sh!t show and all those forums. We're trying to populate the other sections with decent content.

FNK Portal sections will be heavily moderated.

Honestly though, how long have you been surfing message boards for?

Do you really think that's going to happen; especially with the demographic FNK seems to cater to?

Have you ever heard of the term "PIPEDREAM"?

j3rk · #29 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

myles came up with a good tag line. Don't pollute, contribute. As cheesy as it sounds, it's a good rule of thumb.

Large & Popular forums on the internet are all heavily moderated. Take revscene or somethingawful for instance.

j3rk · #30 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by cubed

Honestly though, how long have you been surfing message boards for?

Do you really think that's going to happen; especially with the demographic FNK seems to cater to?

Have you ever heard of the term "PIPEDREAM"?

FNK Portal & The music sections will either contain constructive discussions or be completely empty. If users keep polluting these, i'll just remove them from posting in those sections.

If you want to ramble and insult. Keep it in the sh!t show. There's a reason we called it that.

rawb · #31 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

I DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU MEAN BY CONSTRUCTIVE, THAT IS A PRETTY AMBIGUOUS TERM

I CAN SEE THINGS YOU WOULD VOTE DOWN
-INSULTS TO YOUR ADVERTISERS
-ILLEGAL CONTENT
-RACIST HATEFUL COMMENTS

THINGS YOU HAVE VOTED DOWN
-A POST ABOUT JELLY SHOES, USING THE LYRICS TO JELLYHEAD
-2 POSTS WHERE I QUESTION THE ARTISTIC SKILLS OF AN ARTIST (WHO HAPPENS TO BE YOUR FAVORITE ARTIST)
-THIS TOUNGE IN CHEEK POST WHICH I USED TO OPEN A DISCUSSION ABOUT QUATIONABLE KARMA PRACTICES, USING YOUR SECONDARY ADMIN ALT

WHY DONT YOU VOTE DOWN POSTS YOU DONT LIKE WITH -1 LIKE EVERYONE ELSE?

IF I HAD POSTED ABOUT THE ARTIST YOU LIKE WITH SOMETHING INANE AND POSITIVE (OMG THE DARK RULEZ!!!) INSTEAD OF NEGATIVE WITH FACTUAL BACKUP WOULD YOU VOTE IT -5 DOWN? BECAUSE THAT POST IS JUST AS UNCONSTRUCTIVE. IN FACT ID WAGER HALF THE POSTS ON FNK IN THE LAST 5 YEARS ARE AS UNCONSTRUCTIVE AS THAT.

IS BEING CONSTRUCTIVE AS 'LIKING WHAT J0RD LIKES'.

YOUR POSTING GUIDELINES ARE VAUGE AND IMPOSSIBLE TO FOLLOW.

rawb · #32 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by j0rd

Large & Popular forums on the internet are all heavily moderated. Take revscene or somethingawful for instance.

TAKE GENMAY, 4CHAN AND EBAUMSWORLD FOR THE COUNTER-EXAMPLE

robyn · #33 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by j0rd

myles came up with a good tag line. Don't pollute, contribute. As cheesy as it sounds, it's a good rule of thumb.

nothing he posts even makes sense though. IT'S THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND PEOPLE.

j3rk · #34 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by rawb

TAKE GENMAY, 4CHAN AND EBAUMSWORLD FOR THE COUNTER-EXAMPLE

Those are not moderated properly and are all useless forums.

<3 4chan for hot asian ladies though.

j3rk · #35 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by robyn

nothing he posts even makes sense though. IT'S THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND PEOPLE.

90% of myles's posts are useless as well. I'd vote his shit down in a second.

stringbeans · #36 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

r u mad

Pussy*Kat · #37 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

I love this karma system <3

j3rk · #38 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by rawb

I DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU MEAN BY CONSTRUCTIVE, THAT IS A PRETTY AMBIGUOUS TERM

I CAN SEE THINGS YOU WOULD VOTE DOWN
-INSULTS TO YOUR ADVERTISERS
-ILLEGAL CONTENT
-RACIST HATEFUL COMMENTS

THINGS YOU HAVE VOTED DOWN
-A POST ABOUT JELLY SHOES, USING THE LYRICS TO JELLYHEAD
-2 POSTS WHERE I QUESTION THE ARTISTIC SKILLS OF AN ARTIST (WHO HAPPENS TO BE YOUR FAVORITE ARTIST)
-THIS TOUNGE IN CHEEK POST WHICH I USED TO OPEN A DISCUSSION ABOUT QUATIONABLE KARMA PRACTICES, USING YOUR SECONDARY ADMIN ALT

WHY DONT YOU VOTE DOWN POSTS YOU DONT LIKE WITH -1 LIKE EVERYONE ELSE?

IF I HAD POSTED ABOUT THE ARTIST YOU LIKE WITH SOMETHING INANE AND POSITIVE (OMG THE DARK RULEZ!!!) INSTEAD OF NEGATIVE WITH FACTUAL BACKUP WOULD YOU VOTE IT -5 DOWN? BECAUSE THAT POST IS JUST AS UNCONSTRUCTIVE. IN FACT ID WAGER HALF THE POSTS ON FNK IN THE LAST 5 YEARS ARE AS UNCONSTRUCTIVE AS THAT.

IS BEING CONSTRUCTIVE AS 'LIKING WHAT J0RD LIKES'.

YOUR POSTING GUIDELINES ARE VAUGE AND IMPOSSIBLE TO FOLLOW.

It only takes one positive karma post to bump your shit back up. I think that's pretty fair for moderators to have -5 karmas. Makes it easy and simple for us to moderate. If the community doesn't agree, it'll get voted back up. It only takes +1 to do that. Pretty fair in my opinion.

I missed the humor in your jelly post and i'm sorry for that. But again, you were derailing an otherwise shitty thread posted by kimmie. I rated that thread down anyways.

Ashley*Dawn · #39 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by j0rd

you guys can have the sh!t show and all those forums. We're trying to populate the other sections with decent content.

FNK Portal sections will be heavily moderated.

Good luck with that.

rawb · #40 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by j0rd

Those are not moderated properly and are all useless forums.

<3 4chan for hot asian ladies though.

THATS YOUR OPINION, TO OTHER PEOPLE THEY ARE INCREDIBLY USEFUL AND MODERATED FINE. ARE THEY NOT CONSTRUCTIVE ENOUGH FOR YOU? BECAUSE UNTIL YOU DEFINE CONSTRUCTIVE TO A SET OF RULES PEOPLE CAN FOLLOW ITS JUST 'HEY, DONT PISS OFF J0RD'

I MEAN ITS PRETTY OBVIOUS MYLES (WHO IS MY BOY) HAS POSTED A LOT OF QUESTIONABLE SHIT ON THE FORUM, WHY ARE YOU NOT -5ING HIS POSTS RIGHT NOW?

DO I REALLY NEED TO GO THROUGH AND FIND POSTS THAT ARE ALONG THE SAME LINES OF MY POSTS AND ASK WHY YOU HAVENT MODERATED THEM DOWN, OR DO YOU SEE MY POINT YET.

rawb · #41 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by j0rd

It only takes one positive karma post to bump your shit back up.

UNLESS YOU -10 IT, WHICH YOU JUST DID

Quote:

I think that's pretty fair for moderators to have -5 karmas. Makes it easy and simple for us to moderate. If the community doesn't agree, it'll get voted back up. It only takes +1 to do that. Pretty fair in my opinion.

YEAH BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, YOURE SAYING THAT IF YOUR -5'S DONT SQUELCH WHAT I SAY YOU WILL BAN ME FROM PLACES OR PUT ME IN MY OWN FORUM ETC ETC ETC. AND YOU STILL HAVENT POSTED A GUIDELINE TO WHAT MAKES SOMETHING INAPPROPRIATE. WE ARE LEFT TO GUESSING WHAT WILL PISS YOU OFF. YOU ARE SAYING 'DO WHAT I SAY OR YOU WILL GET THE BAN HAMMER, PS: I AM NOT TELLING YOU WHAT TO DO I AM JUST GOING TO MAKE IT UP AS A GO ALONG, HAVE FUN'

EVERY POST YOU HAVE -5'D ME ON I HAVE BEEN VOTED BACK UP ON. I TAKE THIS TO MEAN WHAT PEOPLE READ OF ME THEY LIKE. APPARENTLY YOU ARE FOCUSED ON MAKING A BOARD YOU LIKE MORE THAN A BOARD THAT CATERS TO ITS COMMUNITY. I DONT GET THAT.

AGAIN, WHY PUT IN A SYSTEM THAT LETS THE BOARD SELF MODERATE IF YOU WILL STARKLY GO AGAINST THE COMMUNITY MODERATION ON POSTS THAT ARE NOT ILLEGAL OR DEMEANING/RACIST.

Pussy*Kat · #42 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

In regards to Jims negative karma. I like this karma system as I think its fair for all those who didnt have 5436432 karma. All those that seemed to have a million karma points had a tendancy to disagree with everyone and everything. Giving everyone 1 karma point, allows equality. Noone is better then noone else this way....on the boards atleast

In no way did it have to do with Rawbs dispute with Jord....as I do agree to his points and some of them are highly valid.

cubed · #43 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

^All I have to do though is posse up 5 people and nix all your posts; doesn't that bother you a little?

FeelGood · #44 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

ban rawb. problems solved.

cubed · #45 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

^why would you ban a contributing member of the community who has been here since the beginning?

decypher · #46 (**permalink**) Apr 05, 07

Hey if we are ever going to turn this into an ad machine of integrated content you can't have anymore rawbism's mucking with the posts, hence the karma system. We'll have to make some Free Rawb shirts and everything.