|
Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
Yes, she has a boyfriend. She has wit too.:noworry:
Women in stable relationships tend not to think of me as another masher, except for psycho bisexual girls from Hell.:wacko: Last edited by radha; Apr 30, 07 at 12:43 PM. |
|
|||
Give me time to woo the Victoria lady.
I spent all last week thinking about inviting her to my place, but then realize the roomies didn't get a decent couch. Egad! That means I have to make my bed decent.:cry: |
|
|||
only if Edge holds the purses.:cheesy:
re: topless women i don't think i'd gawk. they wouldn't be able to tell with the shades on anyway. typical conv: [topless woman gets on skytrain. i am reading a book. 5 minutes pass by] me: are you hot? topless woman: yes i think i am hot. me: no, no. is it so hot outside? topless woman: yes. me: [goes back to reading book] even in a more social setting, i can ignore very attractive women *even when they are out to distract me*. though, if you're throwing yourself at me, then isn't that sexual harrassment? that girl with the broken hand i blabbed about in another thread, when she showed me her broken hand for the second time, i asked her "Are you hitting on me?" she was basically trying to get sympathy out of me for the second time, but she was willing to spend my money. just so i wouldn't be in the doghouse with my best friend or her friend, i stopped bringing up that girl when they both asked, "why do you still like her?" oh and no, i never mentally undress women anymore. we have to be BF-GF first, cos it is really hard to imagine topless a woman i haven't been intimate with. pics don't count. that's just advertisement. Last edited by radha; Apr 30, 07 at 03:20 PM. |
|
|||
totally, gawking is for pussies. you have to go right for the sneak attack ninja-groping.
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
photos from the TERA site: Photos of topfree people (mostly) |
|
|||
This is what my original post tried to say: Misunderstandings about Women and Bare Breasts
1) Why are you encouraging women to take their tops off in public? We are not doing any such thing. We believe women have the same rights as men. Those who wish not to remove tops should keep them on--by choice. 2) Isn't it illegal for women to go topfree? This activity is legal for women and men. A high court decision from December 1996 makes it clear that women and men doing so with no "sexual or commerical" intent are not indecent. 3) Is it legal for women to be topfree everywhere, then? No, because there are places where it is illegal for both women and men to be topfree, e.g. where regulations require tops as well as other articles of clothing. This is completely consistent with assuring women rights equal to those of men. 4) Doesn't the Bible forbid this kind of activity? We don't think so, nor do many others who are deeply religious. But this is not a religious issue. The laws in this country are not made according to certain avowed Jewish or Christian preferences, whatever their source, but to protect a variety of beliefs. 5) Aren't women's breasts sexual? It's up to women to decide when and where they are or aren't sexual. Everyone can respect a woman's or man's decision to lie on a beach and not be bothered, whether she or he has a top on or not. It is unconscionable to restrict women because men have some opinion about them or their breasts. Men aren't required to wear tops because women find their uncovered chests sexual, so the reverse should not be required either. ... If more women went topfree, then breasts would become desexualized. By forbidding bare breasts and nipples in public, the moral minority are culpable in sexualization of breasts. On an aside, Ontario has lower crime than BC, though the crime rates in Yukon and Nunavut are higher (maybe because it's too cold to go topfree). |