|
Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
||||
Quote:
I MEAN....MARKPAUL IMMMMA RIGHT? |
|
||||
Yeah the gist of the video is that history is many many millenia shorter then once thought (I've read some of his articles as well, and it is generally only discuss westren civilization).
All these empires (Egyptian, Chinese etc...) were created in the middle ages by the church, and have since become a conspiracy that they protect. Christ was born 1053 AD for example. Which is really confusing since the reigning pope leo IX probably would have noticed this... |
|
|||
Quote:
I think people who beleive in these types of stories seriously underestimate human failibility. Even in modern times with advanced technology which would appear entirely alien to anyone who existed a thousand years ago we arent able to concot such grand schemes. There is just such a huge body of evidence that counters these type's of theories its not even worth investigating them. Of course, as with holocaust denial there are those that will advance such implossible theories inorder to further their own adgenda. Its always seems to discredited zealots who have expertise in other areas of academics that push these views. Don't you think if this conspiracy were true all those millions of atheist anthropolgists who dedicate their life to study would've uncovered such a grand scheme, i dunno, 150 years ago? |
|
|||
lol those videos are retarded. Pure marketing for conspiracy buffs, just like they have marketing for rebels and grandmothers.
I caught this pretty sweet line near the end: "more fascinating then dan brown at his wildest, but it is truly a nonfiction work that goes to say that everything you have read about history should be classified as fiction." oh noes amazon here comes my credit card. It's hard to get any context out of that video but i did read lightly into the topic. I'm highly skeptical of mathematical logic being applied to history. But i love a good radical mess shit up theory so i'll look into this more. <paraphrase> He is essentially using statistical methods and mathematics to correlate historical texts together from different time periods. He has found astronomical correlations and refutes the reliability of carbon dating. But he has been criticized for using a statistical method that selects certain texts in history that correlate highly but ignoring others that don't. </paraphrase> So basically his logic is starting from a larger and i would say ideological basic to a theory and then uses his math and long winded speech to prove his point. If you look at the politics too. He's allied with kasparov the chess champion turned opponent to Putin's 'dynasty.' They have similar ideological beliefs about history so there's an obvious bias right there. By no way am i refuting that history has been written and burned in many aspects but it's hard to see it so drastically change in this manner. There's some obvious flaws in fomenko's theory off the bat. The ideological nature wouldn't surprise me though, Using mathematical perspectives have been used in many places as a form of power. Look at neoliberalism and how the underlying ideology, based on games theory, is a reductionist concept of social reality. These sorts of logics are used to legitimate power relations in society imo. They try and tell us that everyone is self-interested and individualistic so lets gut social spending and deregulate the state and put our notions of freedom and equality into the free-market. These ideas always start somewhere, then they are put into the service of power and naturalized throughout system. Pretty interesting stuff though. This TA i know is pretty radical and applies social theory to statistical analysis so maybe he can put some more weight on fomenkos side, i'll ask. Thanks for the paper topic guys lolz. |
|
|||
biblioblography: Allegories Gone Wild - The Mathematical Madman
Here's a blog post i haven't entirely read yet but the guy goes into more depth and directly engages the concepts in the book. |
|
||||
I'm just tired of wum and markpaul trying to use grand stories about conspiracies and false histories in order to make up for their failings as social entities on this site.
Oh wait MP, sorry, that's right, you're doing it as a public service for us blinkered sheep. If I ever find time to meet you in between doing everything I can to avoid ever meeting you, I'll be sure to thank you. |
|
|||
Quote:
Sure, okay I'll go with that. I'll continue to voice what I believe in/ask the tough questions that matter to me, it's more important then any praise I could get from any blinkered sheep. Don't bother thanking me, just don't be an asshole. |
|
|||
Quote:
For the record, I don't know enough about this new chronology to back it up, and I never propounded it to be more truthful then orthodox history. It's funny what some people will believe once they ascribe a label to you though. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
also because they are stealing your potato chips. think about it, you open the bag it's only 1/4 full??? They're not gonna pull a fast one on me, where the fuck did 3/4 of my ripples go? Someone's got their hand in the world's bag of of old dutch, if you catch my drift. |
|
|||
Quote:
You just pwnd yourself. It's like your dedicating every moment possible to not letting him get to you, and that, my squishy fruit is the same thing. If he bothers you, just ignore him, trust me it's a lot easier to do on a computer. |
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Is ancient history a lie? Probably. The records of mankind only go back so far (16,000 BC) and they are a blur at best. How am I supposed to believe ancient history if the news I get today is full of lies?
eg. Great Seal secrets revealed! - Yahoo! News Last edited by P.A.R.T.Y; Feb 13, 08 at 01:22 AM. |
|
|||
Quote:
What can I say, Im a sucker, your churlish bullshit makes me feel like rantin...I don't care if you're trolling me, you're talking about paranoia so I challenge any one of you to poke a hole in the following statement: The problem with paranoia in this society lays in the bulk of people who squirm in their cynicism when facing revisionism in history/science/religion. Being a deterministic culture continues to endanger humanity as it nurtures the lack of compassion and cynicism needed to constantly create a culture of war. Until humanity decides to grow up and leave cynicism to satire (which should have it's time and place), we will always be a culture of war, and seeing how we are treating this earth, it has a definite half-life. The paranoia of a conspiracy theorist however, at worst is a silly waste of time (though still good for a laugh), though if there's merrit in the work, it is a couragous step to take for the individual who seeks truth in whatever school of thought they mean to revise. History as we know it, has been revised constantly from such revolutionary minds, and orthodox history is merely an account of accepted revisionism! Sometimes it takes ~200 years for the rest of the Earth to believe it's on a sphere. Yet the world is still proverbially flat in many respects, because emotionally we have not grown up as a society. So the big question is...why is revising history such a daunting task to so many people (not to be confused with the excuse that it's a waste of time)? The problem isn't paranoia, the problem is paranoid or not, people are inherently deterministic, it is linked to personal pride and confidence and is very much an emotional survivalist tactic for the individual. For the truly paranoid individual, it gives them something to grasp onto because their ego is too weak to do so itself. Our society nurtures determinism, but it is defiant on revisionism. This will not last, one way or another. The greatest minds in history are constantly regailed for their discoveries which are almost always revisions of past beliefs, there's always a struggle for the society at large to accept new ideas. The same is true still today. Those who don't create the future they want today, will have to endure the future they get tommorow. |
|
|
Similar Topics | ||||
Topic | Topic Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R.A.W. - live History of Jungle set - video inside | angst | Simply Music | 2 | Apr 17, 05 01:01 PM |
A Brief History of Sexology | Bitchin | Mind and Body | 6 | Feb 22, 05 03:35 PM |
George W. Bush's 50 greatest accomplishments | maztraz | Coffee Lounge | 12 | Jan 15, 05 04:42 PM |
George W Bush's resume | SEAN! | Coffee Lounge | 11 | Jun 02, 04 01:59 PM |
BIG F&K Session at History of Breaks | BreaksBoy | The Chronical | 130 | Apr 03, 03 11:31 PM |