Quote:
Originally Posted by miss.myra
I hear a lot of people say this about Ayn Rand and I'm usually not sure if
1. they've managed to read an entire novel of hers that wasn't atlas shrugged
2. they've managed to read any ayn rand and just say these statements because they seem to go along with what everyone else thinks of her
|
Read half of Atlas Shrugged, and a third of fountain head. I started reading these because I read some of her writings on philosophy and found them very interesting.
Granted this means that I wouldn't have as much knowledge as other people, but I believe that reading some of her fiction does allow me to comment on her fiction writing.
Her essays, are well written clearly presenting her ideas in a clear and concise way. Easy to relate to and understand the basis of.
Her fiction writing on the other hand is a mess. Her characters are poorly defined, lacking any definition. They are written more like examples that you would use in an essay. Not actual people. Her writing is descriptive to a fault. Spending pages and pages describing the procedures behind making steal and what her characters see. Her stories drag on unnecessarily. Yes, I could see it was going to lead somewhere, but I couldn't stand the characters enough to follow it through to the end. And I never figured out who John Galt was either.
Her ideas are great, and extremely interesting. But her fiction writing does not nearly match up.
Some people enjoy this style, I however do not.