To glow or not to glow?

[r@V3r_rAy]

it would be different...

try it out??

[poohbearhoney]

yeah

[yoko*]

Originally posted by c-TaRd

there's already one person I can see trading in their pink text for.. glowing pink text in every single post. AHHH...


(and btw, i also voted no)

lol cause I was thinkin the same.. :hehe:

[Kraig]

I agree with Stabby about the whole thing being annoying unless you have the ability to turn off that effect if you don't want to see it.

[*KeLLnEsS*]

This isn't a rave

[sNyx]

Originally posted by *KeLLnEsS*
This isn't a rave

isn't it? :trippin:

[L2-da-izzay]

do wut eva makes peeps happy :tounge1:

[dfltr]

sweet feature... after all, letting a bunch of ravers loose on yet another shiny/glowing object is just what the world needs.

[narcotix]

i see no point in having the "glow effect" ... i think its corny

[MistressSpankME]

How about NOT

[onefournine]

If people are allowed to make things glow, I want the right to embed the hamster dance song in my signature.

[agent.starling]

im not a big fan on glowing though it is true, the excitment of the initial glow is pretty entertaining. seems like too much work to risk the dislike?!?!

[simplify]

yea, glow, not a bad idea.. but could potentially get very annoying. voted yes. :toasted:

[phat_wop_gino]

I say let the colors fall in place that would be pretty cool
.