|
Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
Quote:
if you take your finger off the caps lock key long enough, you can use it to flip to the hockey highlights and watch the fucking game again. you sound like one of those high school girls in love with matt cooke. cloutier was fully over to the post, the shot was flipped over his pad. hardly a weak goal considering Kolanos had to completely stretch out vertically to get the reach on it. how can you blame anything on cloutier after pheonix had two goals handed to them in the second by the defence during the 4-4? did you even watch the entire game? did you not see the canucks unable to keep it out of thier end the the last 5 mins in the third? did you not see cloutier stop a kolanos breakaway in the third? do you know anything about hockey at all? Last edited by rawb; Oct 27, 03 at 02:49 PM. |
|
|||
LOL i probably know more about hockey than u think And yes i did watch the entire game. Cloutier is a joke. Sure it happens but i'm sick and tired of seeing him choke.
And if i sound like a cheerleader what the hell does that make u sound like? that's my opinion that he's weak. It's a weak goal. IF YOU LISTENED TO THE COMMENTATOR obviously you would have heard him said that cloutier DID NOT get over in time. Obviously you didn't. Second of all. Sure the canucks played sloppy I never said they didn't now did I??? Sounds like your in love with cloutier or something because never did I once state that the canucks played greate defensively. I just said he let in a shit goal. End of story.Now my question to you is do you know what the hell your talkin about? Do you know how to read? where the hell did i state that the canucks played a solid defensive game? Did I state the fact that he was to be blamed on all of the three goals? I just said the third goal so don't go around questioning my intelligence about the game. You obviously need to pay more closer attention to the finer details of a lot of things my friend. Give Hedberg a shot and I gurantee you'll see my point. Last edited by -DLO_604-; Oct 27, 03 at 02:59 PM. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
i never said you were a cheerleader, i said you didn't know shit about hockey, which is confirmed by the fact that you need the commentary to follow the game. go watch the replay. if you need your hand held by a guy in a microphone go see if sportsnet or tsn call it a weak goal, maybe they can also tell you who can be your favorite canuck this week. cloutier isn't a joke. he's a good goalie who has trouble in the playoffs. he's shown that he is solid in the regular season for a few years now. im glad we have hedberg, but really all he has is had one lucky playoff run, he has a lot of proving to do if he wants to be a #1 goalie on any team. |
|
|||
Me being a former goaltender, i think that cloutier is a pretty damn good goalie....he is still developing his skills.
being a goalie is hard as hell, its all about your confidence, concentration, and your defence. even tho he has had a few bad games, he has also shown us what he is capable of...and as he grows older he will become alot more consistant and, begin to develop his skills through experience....he is still quite young :keebler:, it annoys me sometimes when ppl dont give him a chance...its hard work! |
|
|||
i'm a sopel fan, but 1st goal, sopel giveaway.
2nd goal suchy was on the sideboards, went into the corner, then skated out in front to the slot and scored. jovo just watched him step out, and he was not touched. MUSTA BEEN THE GOALIE!!!! note: todd is worth the money regardless of his 'slumps'. i'm not all about giant contracts to any player, but let's face it, he could get a GIANORMOUS contract from anyone. |
|
|||
Quote:
|