who would you rather save?

[NeVeRLooKBacK]

Originally posted by robyn
Once the pandas are gone, they're gone forever. There'll always be starving kids.

HAHAHAHAHHA!!

[MissBehavior]

Originally posted by LostBoyScout
MissBehavior, you are so right about human's god complex. Trying to save the Pandas though, is a good example of this.

Point made, but would they be in the position they are now if we hadn't destroyed their habitat? And what about trying to save more people in the already highly overcrowded countries in the world? maybe that's natural selection.

I still stick by the destruction of mankind over wildlife.

[Antenna_Boy]

Originally posted by IvoryBaby
I would choose both if i could but since i had to choose only one i chose the wildlife animals.

awwwwwweee~~~:):):)

[ryantron]

i guess pandas.. they are cuter and they have razor sharp claws. maybe if african children had claws..

[Antenna_Boy]

Originally posted by ryantron
i guess pandas.. they are cuter and they have razor sharp claws. maybe if african children had claws..

if they had claws we still let them starve and save the OTHER endangered animal species... :finger: