Police agree on Shoot to kill rules

Dj Franco · #1 (**permalink**) Aug 04, 05

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...International/

Edit .....( The Globe and mail link is not working, the exact same article was pasted into Infowars )
http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/shoot_to_kill.htm

Its great knowing there are armed cops everywhere, who have been instructed to shoot to kill anyone who appears nervous or sweaty? Look at the Brazilain guy who got shot in the head 8 times cause they suspected he was a sucide bomber in London, at first they said he was wearing a heavily padded coat, now they say he was wearing a light jacket. He was completley innocent but the order is now shoot to kill. Guilty before proven innocent, not the other way around. Everything I have been saying for years now is coming true, Nationail id cards with microchips are coming first and eventually ones that are implanted into your arms, why cause they wanna be able to identify you and know where you are at all times.

http://www.mytelus.com/news/article....icleID=1981556

http://www.canada.com/vancouver/theprovince/news/story.html?id=dc7c28fa-41ac-4da6-a364-d20f7403518d

These are articles about BC, our liberties are being taken cause of this fake war on terrorism and nothing has even happened yet in Canada, wait till it does ur gonna be wishing you listened to me then. The one world goverment i always speak of is coming on this last year so fast even i am suprised, CAFTA has now been passed, Data bases are being merged as i speak, one world police one world religion. Just like that story about the texas police officer arresting people in BC near Hope, training us to learn how to live in this one world government. Im sick of people not understanding this and not listening. All i can say is when your in the FEMA camps they built for you 10 years down the road, please dont wish you believed me then, k......

Cdn_Brdr · #2 (**permalink**) Aug 04, 05

AAAAAHHHHHH... the world is ending, it's the mark of the beast, Big Brother is watching me, it's the coming of the apocalypse, the end is nigh, JESUS IS LORD, halllelujah, the world is my enemy..... AAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!

Special-K · #3 (**permalink**) Aug 04, 05

Are these posts ever going to stop?

mapleleaf4ever · #4 (**permalink**) Aug 04, 05

LOCKED COCKED AND READY TO ROCK SIR! Take that Terrorist Scum!

Dj Franco · #5 (**permalink**) Aug 04, 05

Well im not gonna sit on my ass and pretend nothing is happening. Im only one person trying to reach out to people and thats really all i can do. Don't reply to my posts if you don't care, but at least read them and when it all comes together at least you will realize it then.

Dj Franco · #6 (**permalink**) Aug 04, 05

http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/a...5/WAKINGUP.pdf

Special-K · #7 (**permalink**) Aug 04, 05

Jesus loves you.

Haze · #8 (**permalink**) Aug 04, 05

Quote:

Well im not gonna sit on my ass and pretend nothing is happening. Im only one person trying to reach out to people and thats really all i can do. Don't reply to my posts if you don't care, but at least read them and when it all comes together at least you will realize it then.

Instead you are going to run about perpetuating fear? If you are so gung-ho about this and so strongly stand behind your convictions, why not go out and do something about it? Start a rally, movement, SOMETHING, ANYTHING!! Instead of just repeating what some yahoos on a paranoid dilusional site are jabbering up and you are eating... You are so busy claiming that the rest of the planet is being spoon fed whatever the NWO has for them, when you are simply being spoon fed whatever prisonplanet.com has to offer...

- ë

wum · #9 (**permalink**) Aug 04, 05

i'm rapture ready:)

Hot Karl · #10 (**permalink**) Aug 04, 05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dj Franco

Well im not gonna sit on my ass and pretend nothing is happening. Im only one person trying to reach out to people and thats really all i can do. Don't reply to my posts if you don't care, but at least read them and when it all comes together at least you will realize it then.

ok, man with all the answers.

how the hell should london police respond? there is clearly a possibility that additional bombings may occur.

what is an effective way to police the subways in light of the possibility of running into a suicide bomber.

if you have no ideas or solutions, maybe stfu.

BongMan · #11 (**permalink**) Aug 05, 05

Ohh ohhh can I join your compiracy webpage and post non-sense and call it a connection based on cold hard relative facts??

Grapes · #12 (**permalink**) Aug 05, 05

Quote:

Everything I have been saying for years now is coming true

nothing has even happened yet in Canada, wait till it does ur gonna be wishing you listened to me then.

All i can say is when your in the FEMA camps they built for you 10 years down the road, please dont wish you believed me then

Sorry, help me out here, are these posts about politics, or you?

It IS possible to offer discourse without making yourself the hero at the center of it all, you know.

You know what? Let's just say that 10 years down the road, we really are in some sort of prison camp or some such... EVEN THEN, I will not look back on this and think "Man, that DJ Franco was a true hero, if only I'd been smart enough to take him seriously......"

I'll probably be thinking two things: 1) God this camp sucks and 2) God that DJ Franco was an ass.

Dj Franco · #13 (**permalink**) Aug 05, 05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hot Karl

ok, man with all the answers.

how the hell should london police respond? there is clearly a possibility that additional bombings may occur.

what is an effective way to police the subways in light of the possibility of running into a suicide bomber.

if you have no ideas or solutions, maybe stfu.

Shoot them in the head, thats what there asking for. Your right theres no other solution, shoot to kill. Doesnt matter if there innocent, kill em first find out later, right. Why not shoot them in the leg, both legs if u have to. No, jump on them and shoot them 8 times in the head. your right London police has no choice

Dj Franco · #14 (**permalink**) Aug 05, 05

If these posts bother you so much don't reply, there here to be read i dont give a fuck if u reply, ur replies are useless anyways.

dre420 · #15 (**permalink**) Aug 05, 05

then stop reading them if their so useless!

thebobman · #16 (**permalink**) Aug 05, 05

hrm, I wonder if it's better to have unarmed cops while dem there hooligans can get guns? gee... it's such a perplexing question...

When was the last time you heard of the RCMP shooting & killing a person wrongly? Now, take that one incident, and look, statistically, at the number of times when an armed office had to draw their weapon to protect themselves or the public against violent crime justly. Now what are those odds again?

Do your homework, and come back with a proper basis for your argument beyond "oh big brother is coming to get us!". People were making that arguement back in the 60s, yes, personal freedoms have become greatly constricted since then, but recognize that the world we now live in is full of much greater threats, and I'm not talking about the terrorism line that gets bandied far, FAR too often; I'm talking about people like Timothy McVeigh, I'm talking about the UniBomber, I'm talking about gang warfare.

Are you willing to throw the towel in and aim for anarchy and the totalitarian power system that would rise from such chaos over the fact the government is taking steps to try and protect you?

Of course it's not all fair and just, but agreeing on standardized rule of engagement seems pretty fucking basic to me.

As for the Brazilan guy in London? What if he had been a terrorist (actual threat or tinfoil-hat conspiracy threat, either or) and the London police had allowed him to escape? How many people would have paid? Can you blame the London police for being on edge so soon after so many innocent people had been killed? Can you actual get an argument against these facts and points other than "URE ALL SCREWED! THE GUMMIT IS GONNA PUT CHIPS IN URE HEAD!!!"

Christ... try and take a look a the greater socialogical system rather than a few isolated incidents...

rawb · #17 (**permalink**) Aug 05, 05

HOW ABOUT WHEN A COP PULLS A GUN AT YOU AND TELLS YOU TO STOP, YOU DON'T START RUNNING THE FUCK AWAY

PS: OMG IT IS THE MOLEPEOPLE

Dj Franco · #18 (**permalink**) Aug 05, 05

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebobman

hrm, I wonder if it's better to have unarmed cops while dem there hooligans can get guns? gee... it's such a perplexing question...

When was the last time you heard of the RCMP shooting & killing a person wrongly? Now, take that one incident, and look, statistically, at the number of times when an armed office had to draw their weapon to protect themselves or the public against violent crime justly. Now what are those odds again?

Do your homework, and come back with a proper basis for your argument beyond "oh big brother is coming to get us!". People were making that arguement back in the 60s, yes, personal freedoms have become greatly constricted since then, but recognize that the world we now live in is full of much greater threats, and I'm not talking about the terrorism line that gets bandied far, FAR too often; I'm talking about people like Timothy McVeigh, I'm talking about the UniBomber, I'm talking about gang warfare.

Are you willing to throw the towel in and aim for anarchy and the totalitarian power system that would rise from such chaos over the fact the government is taking steps to try and protect you?

Of course it's not all fair and just, but agreeing on standardized rule of engagement seems pretty fucking basic to me.

As for the Brazilan guy in London? What if he had been a terrorist (actual threat or tinfoil-hat conspiracy threat, either or) and the London police had allowed him to escape? How many people would have paid? Can you blame the London police for being on edge so soon after so many innocent people had been killed? Can you actual get an argument against these facts and points other than "URE ALL SCREWED! THE GUMMIT IS GONNA PUT CHIPS IN URE HEAD!!!"

Christ... try and take a look a the greater socialogical system rather than a few isolated incidents...

One thing the law has just been passed, you can't look at past statistics when that law didn't exist before. Another thing you don't know the whole story about this brazilian guy, who knows if he was running from the police, the story has changed so many times now. They said he was wearing a heavily padded coat that looked suspicious, now they admit it was a light jacket. I don't know if it seemed like he was running or not, all i know is when im catching the skytrain, i often run to catch the skytrain, doesn't mean i should be shot in the head for it. Your not seeing how evil that is, shooting the guy in the head 8 times. If u can't understand that your just has bad. You probably think its also ok that the soliders in Iraq kill and rape the children in front of there parents. There just letting off steam right, cause thats what there reasoning for that is.

And about Timothy Mcveigh, its a proven fact now that he didn't work alone on that operation, and that the goverment was involved. Theres interviews with FBI agents saying they were tipped off that morning that the building was gonna be bombed.

rawb · #19 (**permalink**) Aug 05, 05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dj Franco

Another thing you don't know the whole story about this brazilian guy, who knows if he was running from the police, the story has changed so many times now. They said he was wearing a heavily padded coat that looked suspicious, now they admit it was a light jacket. I don't know if it seemed like he was running or not, all i know is when im catching the skytrain, i often run to catch the skytrain, doesn't mean i should be shot in the head for it.

so basicly you don't know what happened, but it's probably some huge evil conspiracy for global rights violation because some facts have been reported wrong.

call me silly but i think of the lizardmen/freemasons/bonesmen/illuminati/bush/blair were going to start/continue opressing us, they would probably do their best to avoid people getting shot multiple times in the face on one of the biggest transportation systems in the world.

thebobman · #20 (**permalink**) Aug 05, 05

1. You probably shouldn't be running around anywhere near transit a few weeks after somebody planted a bomb and was caught on security cams RUNNING from the scene. Running for skytrain and running in a are publicly recognized as a active Terrorist target are very very different things.

2. "its a proven fact now that he didn't work alone on that operation, and that the goverment was involved." proven? esqueeze me? I'd like to see that proof.

thebobman · #21 (**permalink**) Aug 05, 05

"If u can't understand that your just has bad. You probably think its also ok that the soliders in Iraq kill and rape the children in front of there parents. There just letting off steam right, cause thats what there reasoning for that is."

dude. what the FUCK. I said it's understandable if the LONDON POLICE take down a MAN WHO WAS RUNNING FROM THEM in and area RECENTLY TARGET BY TERRORIST TO KILL CIVILIANS. How the fuck do you figure that's even remotely on the same plane as raping kids?

If I can't understand, I'm just as bad? Christ, If you can't recognize the steadily increasing threat of nutbags, serial killers & terrorists to western society YOU don't understand.

Dude, you're buyin' what the fear mongers are selling, and you're looking for bonus items in the clearence bins...