|
Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
Is Ottawa listening in? No one seems to care
Click here for the full article
In Canada, everything is muted. These days, Americans are agonizing over revelations that their government taps private telephone calls without judicial authorization. But Ottawa has long been doing the same thing — without a whisper of complaint from public or press. In Canada, George W. Bush's attempts to infringe on the liberties of his citizens receive considerable attention. Yet, similar efforts by the Canadian government do not. Last week, when federal Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart slammed the slipshod way in which Ottawa passes along personal information about Canadians to the U.S., her report merited 459 words in The Globe And Mail, 200 words in the National Post and 140 words in this newspaper. This week, when former Supreme Court chief justice Antonio Lamer hinted that a secretive government snooping agency called the Communications Security Establishment may be breaking the law, he received 630 words on page eight of the Globe, nothing in the Post or Star and 126 words in The Record of Kitchener-Waterloo. The reasons for this rather blasé attitude on the part of Canadians and their press tribunes stem from this country's overweening culture of bureaucratization. As a result, by the time Canadians figure out what has happened, they are already bored. Governments appoint independent watchdogs to supervise particularly sensitive matters. But more often than not, these watchdogs adopt the bureaucratic sensibilities of those they are overseeing — with the result that, when they do say something noteworthy, it is almost incomprehensible. Which brings us to the Communications Security Establishment, a body that intercepts telecommunications traffic. In late 2001, Parliament quietly gave this agency Bush-like authority to monitor Canadian telephone and Internet traffic without judicial warrant — as long as one of the parties was outside the country and the minister of defence agreed. Ottawa also appointed a watchdog, latterly Lamer, to ensure that the agency kept within the law. In his most recent report...he disagrees with this interpretation (he doesn't explain how) and that, in any case, the agency is not giving him enough information to determine whether its surveillance of Canadians is necessary. Or, as he puts it, in the mind-numbing language of Canadian bureaucratese: "The lack of clarity in this regard has made it difficult for my staff to assess compliance with certain of the conditions that the legislation requires to be satisfied before a ministerial authorization is given." Which, simply put, means Canada's electronic snoops may be breaking the law but Lamer doesn't know for sure since no one will tell him. A final note: Canadian media are currently seized by the latest controversy surrounding Bush's war on terror — the revelation that, since 2001, the U.S. has been secretly monitoring worldwide financial transactions. Was CIA given access to our bank records? the Star asked on its front page Wednesday. In fact, as the Star story points out in its final two paragraphs, the answer to this question is a clear yes. Since 2002, U.S. and other foreign security services have had access to Canadian bank records involving international transfers worth more than $10,000. I don't recall anyone complaining at the time. Indeed, the only published criticism levelled at the new legislation since then is that it isn't intrusive enough. Very Canadian. BTW anyone know who did the Census this year? A special prize awaits for the first person with the correct answer. |
|
|||
According to their website, Statistics Canada did it this year, as always.
And this article was a great read. It's kind of an eye opener as to how sly our government can be. We always think they're above it, but to be honest, they just might be better at covering shit up than the US. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Your prize as promised: http://www.metacafe.com/watch/93367/...ck_going_wrong http://www.metacafe.com/watch/97700/tom_and_jerry/ http://www.metacafe.com/watch/21070/...at_their_best/ http://www.wimp.com/teacherpranked http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...00733466919384 |
|
|||
Quote:
Also, you seem to be quite the obvious patriot (this a little off topic but still noteworthy)... could you indulge me with some criticism you have for our Country...if you have any that is :P ? http://www.countmeout.ca Last edited by djmarkpaul; Jul 02, 06 at 08:32 PM. |
|
||||
I've got plenty of criticism. lol But I'm sure if I digressed into those I'd have about a good 95% of this Board and anyone from the Gulf Islands or other NDP/Liberal/Green Strongholds pissed off at me.
Personally I keep my views to myself and direct my criticism towards places it will make a difference. When I was in Vancouver I was involved with a couple Youth Liberal Think Tanks and a Candidate of a Red Cross 3rd World Development Conference. Some of the suggestions from that Event were actually made into National Policy. I don't waste my time preaching to others. If there's a problem with my Nation, I'll send a letter to my MP or other such figures. |
|
|||
Quote:
Your approach is individualistic, does not involve regular citizens such as yourself and puts the ultimate control in someone elses hands, who despite your opinion, does not give a shit about you. "youth liberal think tanks!?!?!?!" Yuck! I like you better as a blind nationalist! :) |
|
||||
Better a thinking individual than a mindless Clone.
Fighting for the wrong side as seen by you. Fighting for the right side as seen by others. Who is on the wrong side is one of the most subjective things of ages past and will be on to the future. "You're either with us or against us!" can easily apply to both sides. |
|
|||
Quote:
In contemporary culture the individual is in fact the hyper individual, and this role is more a product of capitalism and consumerist ideals than anything else. Roles, and opinions that where once thought of as radical and anti-status quo have largely become cliched and parodies of what they once began. Make sure you arent confusing individuality with a need to be noticed, and "special" Because you arent. Im not either. The only true reality that can be considered "special' in this day and age is our ability to change. This amplified by the masses understanding the realities of their environment, and coming together en mass is real power, and of real substance. I dont talk about which side actaully has god behind them, or which side is "good" or "evil" I leave that intangible bullshit for the academics. Im talking about real, living, breathing oppression. The kind that is created by capitaliam/imperialism and injects its tactics into the general public. Im glad that you think you are an "individual" to the point that you had to communicate to someone else. But really all that means is that your either alone, cynical, confused or corrupt. All of which I would rather take ignorance over. On a side note, where do you think your notions of "individuality" stand in a national military force? A military force you support, and a military force that carries out the agenda set by the government you also support, and respresent a class that you may or may not know much about? ez ps: "you are either with us or against us" is a far cry from "you are either oppressing or being oppressed" The former has not context or relationship with objective conditions, whereas the latter is entrenched in class disparity and inequality. |
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
If you don't plan on blowing anything up...then what are you worried about? If the government want's to listen to me hash out my shitty pedestrian existence on my phone ..so be it. If it adds up to one less plane flown into one less building, listen away. 1984 here we come.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Canadian Military Police Kidnap, Detain, Torture Bilderberg Investigators |
|
|||
Quote:
I am worried we are growing up in a society of lemmings, where our rights are slowly being stripped away mechanically, one by one, with an ever growing private sector getting their hands in the lot. I am worried about the notion of one day we may be shipped to the camps as is happening in China, but I'm even more worried about the notion of us not doing anything about it. Quote:
BTW Blake, it's up the road not across the street. :P |
|
|||
Quote:
PLEASE stop comparing canada with the Gestapo. You seem way smarter than that. Shipped to camps ...like in china? Oh please. Melodramatics. "the man" doesn't exist ...there isn't some guy somewhere doing things to strip us of our freedom. And remember , just because you're paranoid , don't mean they're not after you . "lol" Last edited by Scarface; Jul 03, 06 at 03:18 AM. |
|
|||
Quote:
Believe me when I say this I have my issues with "bleeding heart liberals" as you so put it. Though to me the only "bad guys" are the warmongers of all nations that go to occupy other countries, or their own, and haven't the faintest idea of the laws that govern their nation, or simply don't care. Do you agree with the so-called "anti-terrorist" legislation that parliament passed relatively in secret not long after 9/11? Do you buy the "official" version? How about no right for property ownership in our Charter? Quote:
Here's a quick video for a small idea of what's going on in China Canada uses psychological torture on the record even though it breaks the law there pal, who knows what's being kept off the radar *ahem*. BTW this is not a laughing matter, and I don't care if it takes the edge off, it's childish to "lol" about this...though I must say, putting random words into quotes really legitimizes your counter points....oh wait a minute, you don't have any of those....a shocking revelation! Quote:
I have come across many warmongers that have loved to use that same excuse (and I'm not assuming you're one, though you do seem pretty jaded). I do have to disagree though, children are for the most part, innocent....that is, before they are indoctrinated by the state to go fight against the "bad guys". |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
BTW my tag 1337 is in jest, and isn't in quotes...and you don't have to put lol in quotes, as laughing out loud implies you did it out loud. Thanks for coming out, don't let the door hit your ass on your way out. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Spaghetti , spaghetti, spaghetti. |
|
|