Quote:
Originally Posted by Wood
^Run DMC & Beastie Boys sought commercial success earlier & in a much bigger way than Wu Tang Clan. Wu is a really bad example of an artist moving away "from legitimate art to a more profitable market" as you put it. Their debut sold platinum with no commercial radio or MTV support - purely on the strength & originality of their art. A lot of people tend to gauge hip hop's authenticity as if it's inversely proportional to it's commercial success... which is a huge discredit to a genre that has re-written the rules for making a commercially successful record.
"DJs/MCs that have been around since the beginning of DefJam and the whole late 80s New York scene (Run-DMC, The Beastie Boys, Afrika Bambaata, etc) are hardly around anymore and they're about as real as hip-hop gets."
|
It's true the Beastie Boys and Run-DMC went for the commercial success long before these people did, but I think a lot of credit is owed in this regard because that success was earned through pioneer work. Those two groups were the first officially signed hip-hop groups, I'm pretty sure. Of course they started world tours before any other groups, and the Beasties were trend setters from the get-go, mostly due to their controversial nature which the fans responded to immensely (ie. Mike D's Volkswagen emblem which resulted in hundreds of fans stealing the symbols off of VWs everywhere). What I was getting at with the Wu-Tang was the merchandising aspect of it. Keep in mind it has been some time since I've read anything about this, but I am sure it was them who began to market self-inspired products to be eaten up by the fans before it became a prominent aspect of hip-hop. They even had several stores opened, although to their credit they did do a lot of it to give back to the black community. Mostly what I dislike is the move towards the present "crunk" style.
Quote:
This very debate re: the authenticity of hip hop was around back then too... and i doubt anyone bore the brunt of it back then more than the Beastie Boys. Obviously being white didn't help their cause, but it was more their commercial success that branded them as phonies and bought them a wealth of disses on other people's records. Even fellow Caucasian rappers 3rd Bass took shots at them. Now, to people of that same mentality, they're "as real as it gets". Ironic. I loved them then, i love them now, just like i love Luda, Lil' Jon, Pitbull, etc. I'm also a big fan of Zion I, Ugly duckling, and lots of other even lesser known rappers.
|
In my opinion, although I do completely agree with the caucasian point, is that a lot of the hate for the Beasties' had to do with the fact that nobody was doing what they were doing, as well as their sense of humour which was obviously a love/hate quality. They pushed a lot of envelopes in the production of their music. I mean, just look at Paul's Boutique compared to the other albums released that year. Anyways, I didn't bring them up in my original post to start glorifying them. They were just an example.
Quote:
I don't measure their "realness" by what label they're signed to or how many records they sell.
|
No, of course not, but how can someone be comfortable with a man calling out the hip-hop scene when he's label-mates with some of the most commercial, sold-out members? Obviously he's calling everybody still putting albums out because nowhere in the album did he specify. Oh, and please.. Kanye's on the album. If that doesn't raise an eyebrow, I'm pretty much beating a dead horse.