|
Simply Music All genres, hot artists, track ID and general discussion |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
Quote:
Colour me red. :embarrest: oh well - i'm buying the $80 box set anyway :) |
|
|||
I think it will only work for established artists. No way an up and commer can sustain any sort of business with this model without the previous exposure afforded to them by the major labels.
As seen from this thread, it's hard enough getting people to pay money even when they actually like the band. How are you going to sustain any sort of workable model when few people have heard of you and you're swimming in a sea of myspace artists all vying for attention? Some lucky and/or smart artists might be able to figure out some good marketing strategies to get people to listen and maybe even buy, but just talent won't get you known unless you know how to actually get people to listen. |
|
|||
Quote:
Kinda like dj's use laptops instead of vinyl. It's called progression. If your musics good and people like it, they'll come to your show. If you have 1 good song and 9 more shit tracks, people don't have to buy your cd and find that out, they can dl what they like and see you when you come around. IMO musicians are now forced to be musicians instead of prepackaged bullshit with 1 hit single and a shitty overpriced cd. Now they're forced to be a live act, a good live act or no, you won't be able to rip everyone off with your one radio friendly hit. The internet is forcing music into higher standards. No more hiding behind MTV. If your shit sucks, we will know, you will fail. |
|
|||
The deluxe Discbox version of the album also features a second disc with the following songs:
"MK1" "Down Is the New Up" "Go Slowly" "MK2" "Last Flowers" "Up on the Ladder" "Bangers and Mash" "4 Minute Warning" |
|
|||
Quote:
Incidentally, I know the internet is redefining how the mainstream and major labels work. But in the process, it's screwing over the smaller up-and-commers. Last edited by dj_soo; Oct 10, 07 at 11:53 AM. |
|
|||
costs 40 pounds:
THIS CONSISTS OF THE NEW ALBUM, IN RAINBOWS, ON CD AND ON 2 X 12 INCH HEAVYWEIGHT VINYL RECORDS. A SECOND, ENHANCED CD CONTAINS MORE NEW SONGS, ALONG WITH DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND ARTWORK. THE DISCBOX ALSO INCLUDES ARTWORK AND LYRIC BOOKLETS. ALL ARE ENCASED IN A HARDBACK BOOK AND SLIPCASE. THE ALBUM DOWNLOAD AUTOMATICALLY COMES WITH THIS PACK. YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE FILE DIGITALLY FROM THE 10TH OCTOBER 2007. DISCBOXES ARE BEING MADE TO ORDER AND ARE PRICED AT £40.00 INCLUDING POSTAGE. SHIPPING WILL BEGIN ON OR BEFORE 3RD DECEMBER 2007. |
|
|||
Quote:
They will get signed and they will tour and they will blow up overnight. They'll be used up and spit out by the mass media and back to wishing they were just some unknown indie kids in their parents garage just jammin' for fun. C'est la vie. |
|
|||
Quote:
i guess. it's kind of a trade off. they lose some data regarding how many downloads, where the downloads are initiated etc, but they are saving money on bandwidth costs and relieving an already really slow server. they can keep that as payment, heh. does it say anywhere that they discourage sharing through other sites? maybe it does and i missed it. |
|
||||
i don't care much for radio head enough to buy their album. I don't care for any artist enough to buy their album, but i do appreciate their business model and will donate $5.
The only digital things i buy, must come free. .... Nevermind, their website is a piece of shit and I would never pay for this. Way too much fucking work to get what i want. ZShare sorted me out way faster and easier. More work than it's worth. I'll just buy another oink premium membership. |
|
||||
Quote:
"you pirating bitches''...."too cheap to donate". i am not going to even waste my time or my energy with you. |
|
||||
read this soo,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
oh right. I forgot, you're totally doing the moral and just thing by putting artists' work up for free when they're either a - sold in stores or b - (in this case) asking for donations.
This new internet sense of entitlement is hilarious. If you just straight up just admitted you're too cheap to pay back artists for their work then it would be one thing, but to claim that you're actually doing them a service is beyond delusional. Oh well, carry on, robin hood. |
|
|||
simple fact is if they wanted to just distribute it for free, they would have just put it up and not gone through the convoluted process of setting up a "pay what you think it's worth" site. They're obviously looking for *some* compensation for the time, money, and work spent on that album.
I honestly do understand the theory behind the model of "give music away for free - make money back in gigs/merch" but the thing is that not all artists do or want to or even can subscribe to that kind of model and it's not up to you to tell the artists how to distribute their work - especially when it's coming from people who claim to like said artists. |