|
Simply Music All genres, hot artists, track ID and general discussion |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
Quote:
G Last edited by Dj G-Style; Jun 10, 04 at 05:01 AM. |
|
|||
He's a DJ, not a producer, and he wants to record a set. Soundforge is simply better than Cubase at that kind of editing, and probably a hell of a lot faster. What's so limiting about Sound forge?
And if you want ultimate flexibility in production, Cubase is definitely not that. |
|
|||
Kraig, simply trust whom you wish. I recomend Cubase for you. I think you'll find it's everything you want. More of a studio based software and less home personal use style. I think you will appreciate the little differences and the overall end result.
Others have their opinion and you have your own but I think this would be a tool you will learn to love. G |
|
|||
Heh.
Well, seeing as you aren't 100% sure on what cables you need to hook your decks up to your computer for recording, I'm gonna straight-up say that Logic, Cubase, Sonar, Protools, Cakewalk, Nuendo, Vegas, Acid, Live etc are right out. Start with a recording software, any concepts you learn there will be transportable to other software if you choose to later move towards production. I've been using Soundforge since version 1, and other audio-editing apps before that (anyone remember "Razor"?). It is good, solid, stable wav recording and editing software, and time spent learning how to use it is not time wasted. It's been around for a while, and will treat you well. That being said, a few months ago I gave Steinberg's Wavelab a try, and even though I love Soundforge, I find myself using Wavelab way more lately - the tools are much more intuitive, the layout is clean and useful, and the hotkeys make more sense. I get more done in Wavelab, quicker. Nice one, Steinberg! When it comes to mastering your mix, I recommend you check out iZotope's *awesome* mastering VSTi, "oZone". Quick to understand, easy to use, and sounds wicked. *shrug*. For simple recording of audio, package A sounds like package B sounds like package C - it's not like different recording HARDWARE, which *does* make a huge difference. Personal preference will win out in the end - if you're just doing a one-off demo mix, then pick whatever, and you'll be fine - if you're planning on doing this fairly regularly, I recommend you try out a few different softwares and pick the one that best fits the way you want to work. |
|
|||
Quote:
G p.s. If you need any cables at all give me a shout at the office and I'll set you up at the good guy rate. G |
|
|||
I used to use Wavelab now I use SoundForge
Very simple to figure out how to record then edit it up and cut up the single set into indivual tracks. as far as the Sound card the Audigy will do fine for demos.....I have the M-audio 2496 soundcard ( bought from Tomlee ). I got it cause it has RCA jacks on the board. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks again for all the info everyone!
Question - does the fact my sound card doesn't have RCA connections on the back and thus I am needing to use an dual RCA splitter cable to 1/8" to plug into my sound cards line-in mean I will get less quality sound? I am thinking I am going to take a peak at SoundForge AND Cool Edit Pro. The reason being that both of these are available to me right now as is expertise on both programs should I have any questions. Thanks everyone for the info and Gary - I may end up giving you a call for some cables as I will be changing the way my speakers are currently wired. Cheers. |
|
|||
Quote:
as for recording, i use Sound Recorder. it comes with your computer and its intuitive layout is great for productivity. |
|
|||
Quote:
G |
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by Wood; Jun 11, 04 at 03:41 AM. |