|
Simply Music All genres, hot artists, track ID and general discussion |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
Top 100 DJs for 2001 According To DJMag
DJ Mag recently released there yearly poll of Top 100 DJ's in the world. Who is at the top? John Digweed. Here are the top 10:
2 Sasha 3 Danny Tenaglia 4 Paul Van Dyk 5 Paul Oakenfold 6 Tiesto 7 Carl Cox 8 Mauro Picotto 9 Steve Lawler 10 Deep Dish The rest of them can be found Here Dammit! DJ Icey didn't make it. Bah. :035: Any comments? |
|
|||
Quote:
john 2899131 |
|
|||
Quote:
LOL, thats so fucking funny. But yah, most of them are Prog House and Trance. The list is from the UK and well UK likes there Prog House and Trance. Ah well. :) DJ Icey should be on there. Grrr! |
|
|||
Ummmm, saying we have locals better than Digweed is a pretty bold statement. Better at what, playing music? The reason guys like Digweed are #1, and local DJs aren't, is because they're immensely popular, get tunes that no one else gets (months, sometimes years before anyone else gets them), and mix them very, very well. Sure, if I throw down a flawless mix it won't be any worse than a flawless mix from John Digweed, but that doesn't mean I deserve to be the #1 DJ in the world either.
And that's not to mention Sasha... that guy is incredible. |
|
|||
Hmm.
Good to see guys like kraft kuts, dieselboy and the plump djs on that list. It's too bad there aren't more like them. Blah. There should really be a lot more recognition for breaks and jungle djs...it's so much fucking harder to mix breaks and jungle in comparision to trance and house. That's why I learned on trance and moved up to better things. Sean, thanks for the laugh. |
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by djmarkpaul; Nov 25, 01 at 07:21 AM. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Mark, shove it.
You're a pretentious jerk 90% of the time, it's sick. I never said that I was better than any other DJs because I spin breaks and jungle...my point was that I prefer those genres and to my knowledge (personal experience, opinions of other djs) they are more difficult to mix. As well, I said "guys LIKE..." Three DJs off the list were mentioned as EXAMPLES. Learn to read for christ's sake! I'm not even going to bother...you're -always- right no matter what you say, Mark. Even when you've got no fucking clue what you're talking about. |
|
|||
Quote:
And just a li'l disclaimer for the end: My orginal reply was not to single you out or make you feel offended. I'm sure that happened, but if you could repy maturely then I would break it down for you in that manner. I won't do this again if you won't front a leetist attitude in conversations being genre vs genre. I mean we're all in this together. Weather you be a glowstick connoisseur or a rolling up one pant leg rasta. PLUR! No hard feelings!! markpaul :384: Last edited by djmarkpaul; Nov 26, 01 at 06:00 AM. |
|
|||
*rolls eyes*
1. I thanked Sean for the laugh, because in my opinion, the djs that he mentioned don't deserve the recoginition they get in comparison to other DJs.
2. I know enough of you. I know the things you've done in the past before I knew you in the "rave scene" and in my opinion, you're too much of a self-righteous jerk. Remember the conversation we had about god? And you wouldn't give up on trying to convince me that there was obviously such a thing? That's just a perfect example of how you can't let other people have their own opinions. You know, it amuses me that you find it okay to criticize me for making reference to a person rather than a topic, then just turn around and do the same thing. That, my dear, is "rich", not the fact that you seem to think you know more about everything than everyone else. Wait - - that is also "rich". As for my "leetist" attitude...I prefer to be referred to as having a 1337 attitude. Bahah. That's fucking gold how you could say that someone has an elitist attuide! Look in a mirror man...oi. I'm done with this...my stomach hurts from laughing at your sad excuses for rebuttals. EDIT: by the way: Quote:
Last edited by galaxie; Nov 26, 01 at 06:28 AM. |
|
|||
Quote:
markpaul :384: |