|
Simply Music All genres, hot artists, track ID and general discussion |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
mixing on headphones will *not* give you the same results as mixing on speakers. for one, the stereo separation on headphones is absolute, which makes for all kinds of phasing problems.
sure, test your mixes on headphones. work on your music late at night on headphones. listen to your music on the bus on headphones. mixing music on headphones is a n00b error. headphones are designed to make music sound *good*, when what you need is for the representation to be *accurate*. the advice is solid: a good set of monitor speakers is the most important part of your studio. if you absolutely must mix on headphones, for one reason or another, at the very least use this: http://refinedaudiometrics.com/products-hdphx.shtml |
|
|||
In order to achieve an accurate sound base, you need to listen to your mix through some dedicated reference monitors. It`s best to start with quality monitors instead of crappy Sony 3 ways, so start saving up.
A subwoofer will also help you hear the bass, which is very important for this genre of music. I have been happy when I listened to my friends Blue Sky`s, Genelecs, and Yamaha NS-10s. Headphone have some benifits, like monitoring at night if you have neighbors or if you want to listen to the tracks on the train/bus. Sometimes A/Bing the mix from headphones and monitors is good too, because you have to assume that a lot of people are going to be listening to your trax through their Ipods. However, since club music is for big club speakers, it`s better to monitor through some monitors that reflect the natural enviroment of the mix. The mastering studio is going to want something they can work with, so it`s your job to give them something worthwhile. Good luck Last edited by P.A.R.T.Y; Sep 18, 06 at 12:28 AM. |
|
|||
After adding the new headphone plug-in, HDPHX, I discovered that Cubase SX2 already had an effect on my Master BUS1 output.
That's some pretty sneaky shit by Steinberg and it was rendering my files to 16 bit via. UV22HR by Apogee. This is a real pisser, cause I record in 24 bit and don't need some digital P.O.S plug-in making my tracks 16 bit TYVFM. |
|
|||
i'm going to be attempting this whole production thing myself, to see if I am capable. And I certainly think I am, and the advice I'm taking to heart is from dabbler, as dabbler - your track Hard Times has influenced me. Respect.
I really don't know anything about music production. I'm on to Cubase 3, hopefully I can persevere and learn this thing. I've always been talented with music, we'll see how things work out. Last edited by neoh; Sep 25, 06 at 02:30 PM. |
|
|||
Usually what I say is, take a look at a bunch of different software first, find a program which you can get from point A to to point B quickly.
Don't let navagation interfere w/ your creative vision....I'd say first start off w/ Reason 3.0 learn it inside out, then you could always use this function which comes w/ Reason called "Rewire" to further help your understanding of Digital Signal Flow. Rewire essentially connects Reason w/ another MT (Multi Track) and Recording Program which utilizes VST channels (Virtual Studio Technology). Reason to Cubase or Reason to Pro Tools are often the most popular with new producers. Since there is a free version of Pro Tools which gives u 8 channels to work with. try that to start off with. If you like the result and it really clicks, then build on it. Often when I taught an off time table program at an Audio School here in Vancouver, lots of people were very intimated by my favorite production program to use.....E-magic's Logic Audio. The thing with Logic tho, is that 3 years ago, E-magic was bought out by Apple, so everything after Logic 5.5 was programmed for MAC. Other thing for Logic (and in some cases other programs too) is that cracks can really screw around w/ the performance of the program. When you A/B the two, you'll see a big difference over the course of a few weeks. Thus I would recommend, buy the software you're interested, and support the people who make the tools for us to use. Programs Id recommend: E-magic: Logic Audio 7 Pro Tools LE or the Financial Fav, Pro Tools FREE Reason 3.0 Cubase SX Abelton Live 6.0 (Awesome program for Mash ups and Time Stretching) VST Plug ins: FOR PC The "Waves" Bundle ( visit http://www.waves.com ) MAC Native Instruments: Kontakt Native Intruments: Reaktor Native Instruments: Absynth 3.0 Steinberg: LM4 Hope that gets you pointed in the right direction. |
|
|||
^^^ I find Cubase better for mastering more than hands on production, but as I mentioned, it totally depends on the individual and what aids towards the creative vision rather than trying to deal w/ navigational issues. I like how the waves plug ins work w/ Cubase. :)
|
|
|||
Quote:
your supposed to encourage the guy not get him down. you will be absolutely amazed to how little time some producers put it dude. and without all those things u just named. |
|
|||
I have given this guy a recipe for success. My advice is a honest and true. If you want to be a schlep and make party music on a crack version of Reason 3, go ahead.
Last edited by P.A.R.T.Y; Sep 27, 06 at 10:21 PM. |
|
|||
Quote:
i could see myself agreeing with most of what you are saying, but this is not true at all. I've released many singles under various lables, including 2 under warner. none of them had anything to do with how they sounded, really. it was mostly about how you can make your shit smell good. That's modern music industry for ya. regardless, I hate arguments like this when everyone is trying to throw in synth names and sequencer hot keys to show how much they know. what you USE to make your tracks is completly irrelevant to the subject matter. Telling someone to use 'juno 106' instead of Reason 3, is like telling someone to use an sm58 ($120) instead of a Rode NT1 ($430). does it guarantee a better quality or better track? fuck no! depends on what you're trying to do. to the guy who started this thread: budz just plug it in and use whatever you have. install that reason 3 and giv'er. what do you have to lose? worse comes to worse you learn a thing or two about basic sequencing, fx, synth modulations and have a feel of how a studio works all round. is it wrong to use reason 3? nah, there's nothing wrong with it. heck, i still pull some synths out of it, even if i have 13 synths sitting around me. it all comes down what Hendrix said: 'man, if it sounds good, it's good' |
|
|