~~~Is this legal or Illegal?~~~(Narcs, Undercovers, and what they can and can't do)

[inkster]

for that matter, you've yet to provide any evidence countering what everyone is in agreeance on.

this would be an ideal time to pony up, as the monkey analogy might bear some weight and become all that more relevant should everyone be proven wrong. otherwise, it's asstalk.

[Knigel]

Originally posted by inkster
for that matter, you've yet to provide any evidence countering what everyone is in agreeance on.

this would be an ideal time to pony up, as the monkey analogy might bear some weight and become all that more relevant should everyone be proven wrong. otherwise, it's asstalk.

This is not a post requesting "Common Knowledge", this is a post requesting information defined by source and verification with the ultimate goal of questioning some things that we think we "know". I yet have no reason to post any evidence because I've stated no "fact" to be disputed as others including yourself have. I haven’t even yet told anyone that they were actually wrong about this being entrapment, only hinted that it may be incorrect since there is often misinformation in the human computer. I've questioned something many people state as fact and can never really seem to give hard evidence for, something I've also done and continue doing in other subjects. If everyone is so sure about this "common knowledge" where is the Common source that everyone gets it from, it should be well known and should be posted here. How many people remember where they first heard that this was indeed entrapment? What is the definition of entrapment?

Inkster what is the definition of "asstalk"?
Personally I would generally think that it would be defined by answers passed as factual without the source being verified, I don't know how asking for this verification would be "asstalk". I also see something interesting in defending against a request for more information for something that is strongly believed in by switching it around on the questioner with an attack, specifically when trying to use the same tool. Plainly speaking, I asked first.

[aurora]

Originally posted by Knigel

Inkster what is the definition of "asstalk"?
Personally I would generally think that it would be defined by answers passed as factual without the source being verified, I don't know how asking for this verification would be "asstalk".

It's 'asktalk'.

=^*.~^=

[inkster]

Originally posted by Knigel
stuff

quite simply put, if your intention is harm reduction and education, then educate. asking people a question and telling them to look up the answer themselves because you hint that they're wrong accomplishes nothing. it merely comes across as being pretentious nannering, and without subsequent substantiation, becomes asstalk.

i actually posted my challenge as a way of getting you to elaborate and possibly get some worthwhile content in this thread. a spirited debate has risen, and as such, people are probably more open to influence than at any other time. this would be a great time to 'close the deal' and introduce the facts that you suggest challenge the status quo.

[Rytalin]

^Well, I think the idea is to get people to educate themselves.
:moon:
http://www.blupete.com/Law/Charter/S...htm#Entrapment

There.
That was easy!

I'll look for more later.

[inkster]

Originally posted by Rytalin
^Well, I think the idea is to get people to educate themselves.
:moon:

well, considering that this is fnk...

[BabyBlaze]

i dont know if anyone has said this already cuz i only read the first post and become too lazy to read all the rest...but knarcs are allowed to do any drug or do anything to make u believe he is not an undercover piggy. IN fact many cops who have been undercover (sometimes for years) end up going to rehab for quite a while before tehy go back to the force...but ya...it's a dangerous world out there...you just can't tell if he's a pig in disguise anymore...

[Nobot]

Originally posted by Chet
you should have jerked off on his foot
no cops let that slide

HAHAHAHA omg, yes!

[Mr.Wrong]

precious monkeys./

[Knigel]

Originally posted by inkster


quite simply put, if your intention is harm reduction and education, then educate. asking people a question and telling them to look up the answer themselves because you hint that they're wrong accomplishes nothing. it merely comes across as being pretentious nannering, and without subsequent substantiation, becomes asstalk.

i actually posted my challenge as a way of getting you to elaborate and possibly get some worthwhile content in this thread. a spirited debate has risen, and as such, people are probably more open to influence than at any other time. this would be a great time to 'close the deal' and introduce the facts that you suggest challenge the status quo.

I would generally think that a part of harm reduction is teaching people to think, research, and question for themselves. If people don't utilize these tools for themselves then attempts of "harm-reduction" or any "education" become almost futile. If people just don't want to know they will reject information instantly. I'm willing to help people into information but I have no responsibility to give an easy answer. I have many intentions including busting myths. Part of this questioning was to bring some "common knowledge" out into the open and show how easy it's passed around as fact, generally people include information into their "fact" archive which has no verified source, and latter are absolutely certain that it is a fact. I'm trying to get myself into the habit of asking myself for source and verification, as well as others.

Originally posted by inkster


well, considering that this is fnk...

So in the masses it's acceptable to pass off accountability? What’s the point of dumbing down to the lowest denominator?

[ty:rone]

digicams (w/ .mpg/.avi) and camcorders are so useful at a rave!