Nov 14, 06
|
|||
|
|||
|
chalk up another loss for the casucks. 1 fluky goal gives DET the 2nd goal, then another fluky one goes in to win it. what else is new?
|
|
Nov 15, 06
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Guy is making like 1.5 million and has done absolutely nothing. Difference between him and kessler aside from age and their salaries is. Kessler didn't really have much say on the 1.9 million. It was bobby clarke than nonis that signed him for 1.9. Bulis is different he's just the regular player who is suppose to be producing at least 20 goals this season and all he's done is cost us goals. He's not scoring goals. Fuck he better be benched agaain next game.
|
|
Nov 15, 06
|
||||
|
||||
|
would have, should have, could have. fuck that noise.
bulis did not cost us that game. goal most likely would not have happened without the interference. also bert did this countless times and never got ripped for it. chill the fuck out. i got home in time to watch the third period, and besides the shorthanded goal i think it's the best the canucks have played all season. everyone was shooting, cycles were good but kept to a minimum and their hustle was phenominal. sure we have a bunch of people who aren't where they should be, but as a team we're under achieving. defence was horrible on that shorthanded break and luongo definitely should have had it.
|
|
Nov 15, 06
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Do you honestly believe he has any worth to this team? Yea Defensively we are doing horribly. Offensively we shouldn't be doing as bad though. Especially when all our scoring is coming from practically 3 players + the odd one other
|
|
Nov 15, 06
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
i dont think bulis is worth what we paid for him, but what the hell can we do about it. no one is going to take mo/kes/bulis without someone else.
|
|
Nov 15, 06
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Morrison had some worth 3 years ago, but thats a long 3 years ago. Kes/bulis just have inflated salaries. I heard we weren't doing so well in the game and if we had won it would been considered a steal.
|
|
Nov 16, 06
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wade is back in the game
Quote:
Press Release from canucks today, read all about it: Quote:
|
|
Nov 17, 06
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The Burke + Crow Canucks were a better product given there was no Salary cap than
|
|
Nov 17, 06
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is sometimes a reason you spend the extra $$ to get quality. Don't forget that Burke wanted to be here...he was also the sole person responsible for turning the organization around. I consider him one of the most involved and outspoken GM's in the League. How often do you see Nonis criticizing the league or rules or anything??
Furthermore, The Crow turned a team who was sluggishly slow, offensively lacking in scoring goals, defensivley unorganized, and extremely penalty prone (Ruutu), into an actual contender cup contender. The only downfault the organization failed to capitalize on, which lead us to sucking in the playoffs...was acquiring an actual number one goalie. To tell you the truth, I believe (if the Bertuzzi incident did not happen) that if the canucks signed a better goalie *cough*Salo/Turco/CuJo, rather than cheaping out on praying, hoping and spiritualizing that Cloputier would light the way to the cup, we would have actually been in the finals. I don't think Veigneault has what it takes at the NHL level. He is treating the canuck players like a bunch of kindergarten kids *now you can go sit in the corner Bulis, and you too Morrison* and it is degrading the canuck player morale. How can they produce like a team when most of the players are being shit on? Why not invest in a motivational speaker like Mr. Robbins to come in a increase positive attitude in the team? Believe me when I say this, but I think Veigneault WILL NOT LAST, and no matter how good of a buddy-buddy relationship he has with NONIS, business is business and so far the canucks business is suffering. Shuffle the management, not the players. Changing too many players all at once with drastically shift the mind set of actually establishing a team orientation as opposed to individualistic plays. Do we expect Naslund and the Sedin twins to be our only hope??? So far it looks like that is what is happening. On a side note, I will remind once again that the canucks organization PROMISED Bulis that he will be playing with the twins to prove his offensiveness. So far the organization is not keeping their word, they are not patient, and therefore will pay for it down the road. Even now. Think about it. Bulis was producing more with the twins than with others. He needs to adjust to the western style of play with new players. Don't forget the eastern coference is much different than the western one. Morrison was that way too when we acquired him. By the next season he was a number one centerman. Take your pick....but this organization is not really organized OR focussed. *R.I.P* (for now) Last edited by Antenna_Boy; Nov 17, 06 at 12:18 PM.
|
|
Nov 17, 06
|
|||
|
|||
|
i agree..... unless we are happy with bulis playin 5 mins a game on the 4th line, giev him a shot with the sedins again... i think pyatt in front of the net will work if nassy finds his wrist shot again(cuz it fuckin SUCKS right now)
defensively i think we are fine.... having mitchell back is a HUUUUGE help. He is a tank back there and the pressure off Ohlund helps him out a lot. 40 mins a game is too much for anyone in this leage ( unless you are chara or pronger ) With a little more puck luck and more of a killer instinct in front of the net, we'll be ok. Just this rut we are in right now is pretty brutal
|
|
Nov 17, 06
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh yeah...if i hear one more person that knows shit all about hockey rag on Luongo, i'm gonna snap. Just cuz you watch BCTV and catch highlights on like 2 plays from the whole game, doesn't mean you know how it went...I hate those fans that know dick all about dick all and think they are freakin Scotty Bowmann
|
|
Nov 17, 06
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Hopefully we get back some stability on the back end. We should
|
|
Nov 17, 06
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
On the flip side, Bulis is being bullied too much. Do you think he has a positive attitude towards the coach? And vica versa? It is not fun to be in a dog house...but I will tell you this...doing that to a professional athlete who worked hard to get into the NHL is morally wrong. Could be worse, he could have been sent to the juniors. But that is besides the point. If Bulis needs to score to put his believed numbers up, you have to listen to what the player is asking for. If you don't listen to your players, and not that they are whining about anything, you will see a coach who is selfish and is not a leader. True leaders listen to the players and work on DEVELOPING their potential. So far, Alain's reverse psychology tactic is not working, and guess what? THE CANUCKS ARE LOSING :mexitoke: A coach not only affects one player, he affects the WHOLE team *remember that*
|
|
Nov 17, 06
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
Nov 17, 06
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Bulis is a tool so far, If your a pro you should be slapped on any line and be able to produce. If the coach benches you then you should come back even hungrier. PS. Morrison is proving that his former success is a product of Nassy and Bert. He cant do anything now.
|
|
Nov 17, 06
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't agree with you saying that if you put a pro on ANY line you should be able to produce (more or less?). That did not work for Naslund...take another look at what you say and provide evidence of that happening for other teams. Secondly, benching someone to make them more "hungrier" is not the right reason. GM's don't bench coaches for ill performances..they fire their ass. A player's job is to produce..which is true. Case in point, a player also has to follow what the coach says. Bulis does get his shots on net..don't take that credit away. He just has to find the "sweedish" touch. Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Antenna_Boy; Nov 17, 06 at 06:50 PM.
|
