Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing

Gunter S · #1 (**permalink**) Jul 16, 07

Speechless · #2 (**permalink**) Jul 17, 07

Blasphemy

djmarkpaul · #3 (**permalink**) Jul 17, 07

Awsome

M.C. BEAR · #4 (**permalink**) Jul 17, 07

your mom is in fact growing!

Guineveire · #5 (**permalink**) Jul 17, 07

^ dammit u beat me to it

Gunter S · #6 (**permalink**) Jul 17, 07

fact: Mankind has never drilled more than 2 miles beneath the earth's surface and yet we conclude it is filled with magma through and through.

liquidblue · #7 (**permalink**) Jul 17, 07

2 miles? thats it?! wtf.

liquidblue · #8 (**permalink**) Jul 17, 07

That video is hilarious. they just morphed the continents. hahahaha

liquidblue · #9 (**permalink**) Jul 17, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunter S

fact: Mankind has never drilled more than 2 miles beneath the earth's surface and yet we conclude it is filled with magma through and through.

Damn Interesting » The Deepest Hole

You lie!

M.C. BEAR · #10 (**permalink**) Jul 18, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guineveire

^ dammit u beat me to it

ever fuck a bear?

Gunter S · #11 (**permalink**) Jul 18, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by liquidblue

Damn Interesting » The Deepest Hole

You lie!

we still haven't got that far

NinjaBoy · #12 (**permalink**) Jul 18, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunter S

fact: Mankind has never drilled more than 2 miles beneath the earth's surface and yet we conclude it is filled with magma through and through.

Fact: we have never landed on the surface of Venus, but we conclude it's not a good place for a picnic.

thebobman · #13 (**permalink**) Jul 18, 07

Gee, the earth is growing? Wow!
...

Wait, how has its orbit stayed exactly the same? Has its mass not changed? is it inflating? Does that mean its a balloon?

Gunter S · #14 (**permalink**) Jul 18, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by NinjaBoy

Fact: we have never landed on the surface of Venus, but we conclude it's not a good place for a picnic.

fact: that was a lame attempt at humour

NinjaBoy · #15 (**permalink**) Jul 18, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunter S

fact: that was a lame attempt at humour

It wasn't humor, so much as it was mocking you.

Gunter S · #16 (**permalink**) Jul 18, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by NinjaBoy

It wasn't humor, so much as it was mocking you.

so you're only purpose in this thread is to mock and be smarmy, duly noted.

NinjaBoy · #17 (**permalink**) Jul 19, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunter S

so you're only purpose in this thread is to mock and be smarmy, duly noted.

What do you expect, your posting a video from someone who has been discredited a fraud before.

He has a series of videos like this, all "proving" theories that have no basis.

Uh, if his theory is true, how come earthquakes only happen on fault lines. I thought his video proves they don't exist.

omega_image · #18 (**permalink**) Jul 19, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebobman

Gee, the earth is growing? Wow!
...

Wait, how has its orbit stayed exactly the same? Has its mass not changed? is it inflating? Does that mean its a balloon?

exactly what i was thinking.

now i'm not going to pretend im some all knowing earth science mofo, but changing the mass of the planet would have changed

a.) the orbit of earth around the sun
b.) the orbit of the moon around the earth

something smells fishy.

NinjaBoy · #19 (**permalink**) Jul 19, 07

Quote:

Originally Posted by omega_image

exactly what i was thinking.

now i'm not going to pretend im some all knowing earth science mofo, but changing the mass of the planet would have changed

a.) the orbit of earth around the sun
b.) the orbit of the moon around the earth

something smells fishy.

Once you bring anything except for the fact that all the cotenents come together perfectly (which they don't, you can clearly see he changes the shape and masses of the conenents as the video goes on).

You have to forget that Earth quakes exists, gravity (for the growth he is talking about Earth's gravity would have change a huge amount, unless you believe in hallow earth), orbit any several other issues.

NinjaBoy · #20 (**permalink**) Jul 19, 07

Oh, and I also wanted to add: Neal Adams? Besides having his theories discredited (IE- hollow earth), he hasn't done anything that has to do with science.

Next time you are going to purpose a theory, make sure it's from someone with an actual scientific background. Not from someone who's major contribution's to science aren't limited to the fictional realm of the fantastic four and the x-men.

An actual scientist, not a comic book artist.

Neal Adams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia