Nov 23, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
did lisa-marie really love michael jackson?
|
|
Nov 25, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
I really don't like the Black Eyed Peas.
|
|
Nov 25, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Nov 25, 05
|
||||
|
||||
|
Skool and Money
School is based on the idea that your parents
A) aren’t smart enough to teach you themselves B) can’t be bothered C) too busy making money The thing is, if the school system is so good, how come your parents aren’t smart enough to teach you what they learned? And if they’re too apathetic why did they have kids? So it must be the money… The good thing about having a money system of course, is that it forces people to work for each other, providing services while monitoring respective account balances. But what we may not notice is that it forces us to be self centred in the bargain. If we had no money we would have to work for each other gratis, and we can’t have that.
|
|
Nov 25, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
first of all, being smart and being able to teach are two completely different things. and let's be honest here.. do you really believe that some of the things they teach you in school require a 'smart' person' to teach it? second, I don't believe school is necessarily all about learning.. there's a social aspect that I believe is pretty important in terms of a child's growth and developmental needs. though homeschooling may be great for some kids, if you have access to all these free resources (i.e. computers, games, toys, a gym with equpment), as well as have opportunities to play with other kids their age and make friends, how is it considered 'apathetic' of a parent to send them off to school? thirdly, if you were a mom with 4 children, ranging from <1 year to 7, can you realistically believe that having a very structuralized, daily lesson plan for all her kids can be easily accomplished? how the hell would sending her kids off to school mean she simply 'can't be bothered'? geez. --Joanne :P Last edited by Joanne; Nov 25, 05 at 08:20 PM.
|
|
Nov 25, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
