savethemales.ca?????

[Ragga_Wh0re]

so my mom sends me a fucking email with this url innit stating that the article listed on that page is "interesting and has valid points"...ive never had the displeasure of reading something so fucking ridiculous in my life.

http://www.savethemales.ca/201101.html

turns out even with a few letters infront of your name you still can be a stupid jerk off.

no wonder why I delete 99% of the emails my mom sends me.

gosh.

[Senior]

"Hi, I can form arguments at about a grade 2 level!" Seriously can you even get mad at someone like this?

[impure]

Originally Posted by Senior

"Hi, I can form arguments at about a grade 2 level!" Seriously can you even get mad at someone like this?

she uses as much intelligence in this post as the person about whom she posts.
irony?

[Ragga_Wh0re]

gee.i must have missed the memo on making posts where you vent about shit coming accross as "intelligent"

fuck off im getting sick of your antics.Go stroke the hardon you have for me elsewhere jackass.

[tiedye]

worst thread ever. Can I have the IQ points your complaining cost me back?

[Ragga_Wh0re]

Originally Posted by Senior

"Hi, I can form arguments at about a grade 2 level!" Seriously can you even get mad at someone like this?

im not mad at the guy who came up with that tripe,but mad at my mom for sending something so fucking assinine to me...and her actually agreeing with the shmuck who wrote that garbage.

[fable]

Originally Posted by impure

she uses as much intelligence in this post as the person about whom she posts.
irony?

I think you need to check out the "stupid protestors" thread.

[diva]

too lazy and uninterested to click on the link

someone gimme the cliffs

[Ragga_Wh0re]

basically its a right wing crony taking excerpts from a book written by queers in the 80`s about how queers are socially irresponsible/inept in every aspect of life...but since it was excerpts taken from a book im thinking the author of the piece took those particular excerpts way out of contex to serve his own anti gay purpose. He is highly manipulatory in building up a "viable" arguement against gays and how theyre morally and socially reprehensible.

Its basically hate literature but candy coated.

[Gusto]

yeah he uses that book as though it is the de facto source on all things gay, and uses their arguments to form his own. of course, it was written in 1989 and i imagine most gay people don't agree with the shit they wrote anyway. his argument is so flawed that it's funny.

[beedub]

I was clicking around that site and they had a reference to this story here, sad but very interesting:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edith_Cavell

http://www.edithcavell.org.uk/

Says there is a mountain in the Rockies and a school in Van named after her.

[impure]

Originally Posted by Ragga_Wh0re

fuck off im getting sick of your antics.Go stroke the hardon you have for me elsewhere jackass.

has anyone else said they think you have a god complex?

[DJ Ponz]

From the piece:

This is the relationship between society and homosexuals today. Gays argue that same-sex behavior is no different than being left-handed. On the other hand, they say heterosexual behavior is not natural, but socially conditioned and "oppressive." Heterosexual society and family are taking heavy casualties. Our stupid, opportunistic and craven leaders have betrayed us. We don't even know we are at war.

Ya, this is where I stopped. I wonder how many gay people actually think that heterosexual behavior is unnatural? I thought PhD's were trained in logical and verifiable argument. Assinine indeed.

[Ragga_Wh0re]

i can see where a statement such as the one you had quoted above^ would ring true...IF YOU WERE A FUCKING MEMBER OF NAMBLA!!!!!!!!!!!!

maybe we should ask Svend Robinson for his expert man-boy loving opinion?