Myra raises a good point about technology in our history. We really can't escape it because even forms of social organization or the inventions of oral and print cultures can be seen as a type of technology.
As for the good or bad thing. I think that technology is only bad when it's held up on a pedestal like a faith in positivism, otherwise, it really depends. No technology is a complete answer for the democratization of information, for example, because there are still real world restrictions on equalities. This doesn't mean that technology is all bad either, I believe it rests somewhere in between. Saying that technology rigidly determines a good or bad result is falling half short of the entire picture. It really has to be applied on a case by case scenario because somethings like architectural determinism, which is considered when designing public space and cities, can have more of a rigid determinative effect while things such as communications technologies depend on how it's used as well as the structural and economic considerations involved. [/run on]
|