|
Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
same-sex marriage in canada
although all of the States in the U.S. election this week voted to ban same-sex marriage, Canada is quite different.
Saskatchewan has just allowed same-sex marriage. so now gay couples can get married legally in: Ontario, British Columbia, Quebec, Manitoba, Yukon, Nova Scotia, and Saskatchewan. Read The Globe and Mail Article |
|
|||
Quote:
Alas, it doesnt really look like we're moving in that direction - if anything, we're moving further to the right. Dont expect singe-tiered medicare to last out the decade. At least we might be seeing some movement on the PR issue though - referendum on Single Transferrable Vote this may! YES! |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
why is it all of a sudden the "in-thing" to do? Thousands of years man and woman have been getting married, now they feel man and man should be? |
|
|||
Quote:
ahhaha, and i said i wouldn't get into it. okay, stopping. |
|
|||
^What I want to know is why they let women CHOOSE who they marry. That's just crazy. I think we should go back to the way it was. I want to be able to pick my child's husband for her. And I want to marry her off to some guy 3x's her age. That's the way it should be.
Oh and Neoh, why the fuck do you even care if two people of the same sex get married? Edit:for Neoh |
|
|||
Quote:
becuz back in the day they were stupid and murdered homosexual's.. cuz it was wrong.. jus like they murdered blacks.. cuz they thought they were wrong.. step outta the box my friend.. why should sumone play the roll of god and say "hell.. u cant get married becuz ur the same sex" .. fuck.. if they love eachother and they wanna get married let them... is the person(s) marrying u?!... no.. so it doesnt matter to u... wut if u were in love w/ the most beautiful women on earth (in ur eyes) and u guys were planning on getting married... and then the government told u guys u couldnt becuz u guys are a different religion?? *** its an example *** |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
With all aspects put aside, I really have no say on what the government does with same sex marriages, I am going by the morals I grew up with. Marriage, as seen by the vast majority of married people in the world throughout history, is a religious covenant between the married couple and God. It is very likely the most profound manifestation of religion in the average person’s life. The recognition of their marriage by the state (if such recognition even obtains) is strictly secondary and rather than enhancing the relationship between the married couple often interferes with it by producing governmental red tape and increased taxation.
Since homosexuality is an issue that each person must deal with themselves (or an issue that they must deal with between themselves and their god) and is not a matter that I am concerned about at all, I would be more than happy to allow, even encourage, the state to create a contractual obligation that has all of the “benefits of marriage” (which is mostly governmental red tape and increased taxation). But to say “recognize gay marriage” instead of “create same sex unions” is misleading at the very best. There is nothing to recognize. Not in the same way that the government “recognizes” religious marriages that have thousands of years of tradition behind them. Government actually does nothing for marriage, though it does do things to marriage (taxation, etc.). In the institute of marriage government is superfluous. It has no place. It is not wanted. It forces its way into marriage for one reason: revenue. Same sex unions are not, in themselves, threatening to me in any way though I do have a few concerns I will talk about in a moment. The idea of same sex marriage, though, seems out of reach. Marriage is a religious institution, remember, and religions cannot be made to change their beliefs. If the belief system of the religion does not include same sex marriage they will not marry gay couples. If a gay couple shares the belief system of the religion they will not support same sex marriage either. And I ask you, unless a same sex couple shares the belief system of the religion why would they want to be married under it? It was originaly intended to be a religious covenant between a man and woman, in the witness of God, this is why we are married by a preacher, and they are the only people who could do it (at least for thousands of years, until the government said they can do it.) Last edited by neoh; Nov 06, 04 at 10:55 AM. |
|
|||
Some good points. But marriage can exist without religion. I'm going to get married, and I'm not religious in the least. This isn't an appeal to the church to recognize gay marriage, but an appeal to the government to let people of a certain sexuality have the same rights afforded to you and I. Sure, marriage between man and woman is a long standing tradition, but new traditions have to start somewhere.
You're right, though, this won't go anywhere. You have your opinions and I have mine. I'm a liberal-minded person and think that people should be able to do about whatever the hell they want, so long as they don't adversely affect those around them. |
|
|||
Quote:
Hhhmmmm.............well I don't believe in god. If i were to get married it wouldn't be about religion. Am I still allowed to get married? You know there is a lot more to marriage than just religion right? |
|
|||
Quote:
I feel the same way. Marriage is the union of a man and a woman. The concept of gay marriage is just pissing on one of our most sacred traditions. However, a gay couple should have receive same rights, benefits and respect given to a married couple. |
|
|||
Rhianna, I know what you mean:
Quote:
|