|
Coffee Lounge Talk amongst other community members. |
View Poll Results: well? | |||
good | 0 | 0% | |
bad | 1 | 33.33% | |
I don't know | 2 | 66.67% | |
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
||||
Pharmaceutical giants hire ghostwriters to produce articles - then put doctors' names
Revealed: how drug firms 'hoodwink' medical journals
Hundreds of articles in medical journals claiming to be written by academics or doctors have been penned by ghostwriters in the pay of drug companies, an Observer inquiry reveals. The journals, bibles of the profession, have huge influence on which drugs doctors prescribe and the treatment hospitals provide. But The Observer has uncovered evidence that many articles written by so-called independent academics may have been penned by writers working for agencies which receive huge sums from drug companies to plug their products. Estimates suggest that almost half of all articles published in journals are by ghostwriters. While doctors who have put their names to the papers can be paid handsomely for 'lending' their reputations, the ghostwriters remain hidden. They, and the involvement of the pharmaceutical firms, are rarely revealed. These papers endorsing certain drugs are paraded in front of GPs as independent research to persuade them to prescribe the drugs. --------------- holla |
|
|||
this all comes down to the doctors. are they willing to put their name on something that is dangerous, doesn't work, etc? if they are willing to do that, they could have been paid to write a biased article to begin with. i don't think it matters that someone else wrote it, doctors aren't necessarily writers, but the doctor who stamps the article with his name/approval should be held responsible.
|
|
|||
Quote:
as for ghostwriting, im not sure about that academics can get in alot of shit when their articles are plagarised or their experiments are faked. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
liek i said most of their testing and trials are funded by the drug companies who develop the drugs. p.s you need to make a fourth option on your poll: "i dont give a shit.' |
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
As for the FDA. Like so many things American money talks and the pharma giants have a lot. They often get their way unless there is extreme evidince to suggest their drug is unsafe. BGH was a prime example of that. If I was an American I'd be really pissed off at the way that all works.
|
|
||||
Quote:
RED!!!! |
|
|||
I know a few people who have seen psychiatrists and it's interesting - all the shrink does is decide which drug(s) he's gonna prescribe. No psychotherapy or anything like that. Pills cure all, or that's what the medical/drug industry would have us believe.
In many cases any intelligent person could also decide which pill to use, just from reading web pages for a few hours, and I'm sure a nurse could do this task. But the shrink gets a few hundred grand a year for doing this, and there's a shortage of shrinks and they don't let anyone else do the prescribing, so lots of mentally-ill people get no help, not even pills. This is one of the reasons we have lots of wackos running around. SNAFFU! (Situation Normal, All FFokked Up) |
|
||||
Quote:
You can watch the recent documentary "Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room", particularly the part regarding Enron and their abuse of California's power structure, to see how well that little theory played out. I just don't understand your logic. Captialism with Government intervention is supposed to lead to Corporations having too much power? Then what the fuck does Capitalism WITHOUT Government intervention lead to? Like letting a pitbull off its leash, if you ask me. And we see the evidence of that in George Bush's America constantly. Last edited by Grapes; Jul 26, 05 at 07:42 PM. |
|
|