Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
the government wants to rouse up some emotion, that's true. but they don't want to rouse up negative emotion against themselves, they want to make themselves look positive and the enemy look negative. otherwise their racketing for solidarity against the 'enemy' isn't as effective. attacks where people die make the government look bad; they make people angry at their government for not being able to protect them as well as angry at the 'enemy' (who, in this hypothetical scenario would be the same thing). however, having a fake attack that was stopped can rouse the same emotion of fear. just pretend that you stopped a huge bomb from going off in a building, or another plane flying into another building. people can already imagine what would happen, they've seen it before...they don't need to see it again to be reminded why they are afraid. they just need the fear that it COULD have happened again to remind them why they want to give up their freedoms to the government. your theory just doesn't make sense when you look at it this way. the government could do better rallying without a real attack because they would win the people's fear and their hearts, instead of just one. it would make them stronger because people would gain more trust in their government.
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
edit: maybe they did that so they could repair some of their reputation after allowing all those people do die in the first attack.
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
^well, i guess my theory doesn't work as well if you believe that the government staged 9/11 in the first place. i still think you could create fear by staging a fake attack, however, you would be right that there would need to be an initial real attack to get the ball rolling.
but if that's the case then why go for something so big. since the states has hardly any experience with terrorist attacks in the past and hasn't even been attacked by anyone for many many years, then why would you need a big show like blowing up the twin towers to get your message across. the american people before 9/11 felt so safe in their little United States bubble that a much smaller attack like the one in London would have created a very similar panic and fear. it just doesn't make sense why they would create such a huge attack when killing 100 of their own citizens or even 500 would have been sufficient.
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
also if they were just using 9/11 so they could get people angry enough to give up their freedoms and give the government a go-ahead to start a war in iraq then why didn't they blame Sadam Hussein instead of Osama Bin-Ladin for the 9/11 attacks. that would have made more sense...and if both were going to be a lie then why not use the one that makes people more willing to go to a war in Iraq.
sure they related the two events later, but why didn't they bring Iraq and Hussein into the debates right after 9/11 if that was their plan all along?
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
it's like writing a fiction short story :)
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now America accuses Iran of complicity in World Trade Center attack What next.. France? Syria? North Korea? There have been so many lies and contradictions, but we have a politically apathetic population that just let's it all slide.
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Are you fucking stupid they attacked Afghanistan because that is where the Taliban and Al Quaida were based. Please next time before ya try to come up with somthing think about what your typing people please.
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
^that doesn't prove that they were behind the attacks themselves, that just proves that they are using the opportunity to gain entry into other countries.
you still haven't proven to me that the government had much to gain from staging such a huge attack as 9/11 to rally everyone together. like i said before, if they really wanted to do that and attack their own citizens i doubt the would have done something as dramatic. simply blowing up a few planes, or a subway in newyork would have done the trick. you're just convicing me that terrorists did the blowing up and the U.S. is using the opportunity to invade some countries. i can see how that would make it look like the U.S. is behind the attacks as well, but when you really look at it closely it just doesn't make enough sense. edit: for wum
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
How can you really say what CNN is reporting is bullshit do you know all the fucking facts you little twat. I bet ya if I wrote on one of your conspiracy websites that milk didn't really come from cows you would blame the government and call it a cover up aswell wouldn't you?
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
just because i don't agree with your theory that the States is behind the attacks doesn't mean that i agree with every piece of shit that CNN spouts out.
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
unforunately, i have to stop posting soon as my dad is coming to pick me up and take me into white rock because we're leaving for boston tomorrow to visit family for two weeks (no, i'm not american).
it was interesting debating with you guys, but all you have done is further my belief that your conspiracy theory is wrong and that the states are not behind the attacks and neither is britain.
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is retarded....There is so much Proof that the US funded 911. Sidekick, Bongman look it up you idiots. Dick Cheney in charge of NORAD on Sept 11 ordered to them to stand down, Drills on 911, Operation Northwoods, "pulling of Building 7, Larry Silverstein buying the world trade centre a month before the attack and insuring it for 7 billion dollars, passport of hijacker found in debris but later was found alive in Morroco, 7 of 19 hijackers found alive, Multiple warnings of attacks as far as a month before, Mayor Willie Brown told not to fly on Sept 11, survivors of 911 and fireman heard bombs coming from towers and were interviewed, FBI agents coming forward and saying it was government coverup (of course later fired), George Bush's brother running security for world trade centre building,
Oh man i could go on and on and on and on................I didnt even list half of it Go ahead and look it up for yourselves
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Terrorists or Mossad ?
There was an "Exercise" at the exact same time as the "Terrorist" attack.
The cameras on the Bus weren't on, even the Bus driver said that's fishy. Netanyahu called the Embassy 6 mins before the first bombs, to say he wasn't coming to do his speech because of the terrorist attacks. For an hour EVERYBODY thought it was an electrical malfunction. Netanyahu called the Embassy 1 hr and 6 mins b4 anybody knew what had really happened. Figure it out sherlock. BY WAY OF DECEPTION THOU SHALT DO WAR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WAKE UP YOU GOD DAMNED GOYIM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Jul 21, 05
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by wum; Jul 21, 05 at 09:25 PM.
|
