|
|||
Quote:
weak, unresearched, counterpoint based on ignorant assumptions out the the window. Last edited by dj_soo; Nov 30, 08 at 05:26 PM. |
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by dj_soo; Nov 30, 08 at 03:25 PM. |
|
|||
Quote:
I see a conservative majority in the near future unless this coalition proves to be the best government ever. |
|
|||
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Was just listening to news 1130.
It seems the NDP accidentally invited a Tory to one of their conference call sessions. Basic gist of the meeting (was recording and distributed by said Tory) was Jack Layton bragging about how he planned to join with another party and topple the conservative government. This conference call took place before the vote/subsidy ban proposal was made. Makes sense, considering this is the only way the NDP could ever (in a million years) actually have real Federal political power. |
|
|||
despite the fact that the conservatives have since rescinded their move to bankupt opposition political parties (btw if the liberals tried this at any point my bet is conservative nut riders would be crying foul and blaming liberal corruption) people still need to realize that the conservatives are failing to address a serious economic crisis and attempting to create more separation in government at a time where the exact opposite is needed.
|
|
|||
Quote:
I recall reading, though I have no link, something that said the Conservatives gave a massive increase to infrastructure spending for the new budget. In my opinion, this is much better than simply throwing cash at companies who failed to prepare for the future. If we're going to spend government money making busy-work for people, I'd rather get a new highway than a bunch of cars that no one wants to buy. |
|
|||
Actually the Conservatives campaigned on a "steady-as-she-goes" policy towards the economy by saying nothing was wrong and nothing needed to be done. And they have moved away from the "no deficit" rhetoric because it's becoming quite clear that is simply not possible and because they are preparing to announce a coming deficit.
|
|
|||
Quote:
No one elected a Coalition government of NDP/Liberals/Bloc I'd be very interested to see how many people would vote for that coalition government as a whole, not the individual party's. |
|
|||
I seem to remember a website that helped citizens strategically use their vote to counter conservatives winning in specific ridings. I think a lot of people think this way.
I don't agree with a non-elected party taking power though. They should resolve their differences for the good of the country, or hold another election with the newly formed parties. |
|
|||
Quote:
We did not elect a government - we elected an MP for our riding, these MPs form the house which then make the policies. A majority of the house must vote in favour of any motion and since the cons have a minority government, they cannot, by definition, make arbitrary decisions without gaining at least *some* approval from the opposition. And even thought Harper only needs a handful to opposition to vote in his favour, he basically managed to piss off all 3 opposition parties simultaneously. So if the house loses confidence in the current government, it cannot function and the gov-general can do one of two things - call an election or allow a coalition to govern since the people *did* elect those MPs and if those MPs decide to band together, they then have the majority. This is not America where winner takes all or people are voting for a party - people are supposed to be voting for an MP that best represents their community or riding in the house of commons. |
|
|||
I guess it really DIDN'T matter which way I voted after all.
If I voted Cons, my party was going to be ousted. If I voted Libs, they'd promptly ignore my Western interests again by siding with the Bloc. If I voted NDP, my party would be nothing more than a follower. If I voted Green, I'd be the laughed out of my riding. Maybe the Work Less party wasn't such a bad idea after all... |
|
|||
Quote:
I am one of many who sway their vote between liberal and other parties all the time. In fact I think its safe to say the majority of Canadians are liberal thinkers, its just that many of them will move either right, left, or towards even the green/bloc party when the liberals arnt at the greatest. Last edited by R Wellbelove; Dec 02, 08 at 04:10 AM. |
|
|||
Quote:
Harper called the election because he could not come to terms on having a minority government. He doesn't give a shit about the oppositions opinion. The opposition represents the majority of canadians (because they were elected... duh). So in reality. Harper doesn't care about the opinions of the majority of Canadians that casted a vote. Not only did harper shoot himself in the foot. But he took time to perfectly aim and pull the trigger. When you look as to why the Liberals/NDP/Bloc formed a coalition, they all have one thing in common. They are the majority and there opinions count. Some people are accusing them of a "power grab". If anything it was the conservatives that were in a "power grab" mode with only a minority government. On this side of the world, we live in a democracy. Now the consevatives are using fear tactics towards canadians. That the coalition is a "deal with the devil". The conservatives ideology may work in a third world country but not here... What next... are they gonna start practicing voodoo??? |
|
|||
Quote:
The coalition claim to represent canada, but they have fewer seats than the conservatives? The only reason this can go through is because the Bloc allow it, what are they getting in return? Quebec doesn't win here, the separatists do. And you realize that the conservatives got most of the rural ridings west of ontario, right? Rural=3rd world now? |
|
|||
Quote:
If you were to go back in the 90's and bring up the subject that the Bloc would join a coalition with any other forms of federal governments one would says "Never... NOT in a million years". We are now 13 years since the last referendum that failed and the sovereignist / seperatist movement FELL. The newest thing in Quebec is the ADQ which started as nothing but is gaining popularity. They are not sovereignists or seperatists. They are Nationalists. They are are a party that is sick and tired of watching both sovereignists / seperatists try and divide Quebec from the rest of Canada. If anything, it was harper (as a federalist) that tried to stir the pot when he was first elected by recognizing Quebec as a nation within a nation, but nobody gave a shit about it because nobody in quebec cared anymore. If this comment was made in the 80's and 90's by a prime minister when the seperatist / sovereignist movement was at its peak.. We would be living in a different Canada then we are living today. |
|
|||
more than anything this coalition is showing that the bloc are realizing they need the rest of canada. By being a part of this coalition (unofficial or otherwise) this is one of the first steps of real national unity we've seen from the bloc in decades.
|
|
|||
PARTISAN RAGE STRIKES AGAIN!
can Harper nutriders please tell me 1 thing the Conservatives have done since October to actually address the problems with Canada's economy? Can they also tell me anything they had on their platform when they wasted 3 million dollars of taxpayers money to call an election other than 'staying the course' what a pile of shit that was, seeing as how our economy has now been officially in recession since last December. Harper used an opportunity to actually address and take action on the economy to play partisan politics when the country needs anything but that. Ignoring Canada's REAL problems did nothing but bond the opposition together as a united force to stand up against it. Remember, the Conservatives bonded with other political parties to vote non confidence and force canada into an election over something that in the big picture was much less of a big deal than what's happening in Canada today. Even republicans and democrats are working together in the US to try to address these problems. Grow up, Harper. |
|
|
Similar Topics | ||||
Topic | Topic Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Global Week Of Action Against War + Occupation | fable | Coffee Lounge | 3 | Mar 13, 06 02:24 AM |
Alternative: A COWSMIC VIEW OF WORLD ORGANIZATION | cinist | Coffee Lounge | 2 | Jun 09, 05 01:27 PM |
If war with Iran prompts a draft, would you fight or go to prison? | wum | Coffee Lounge | 30 | Feb 12, 05 03:59 PM |
War! | sexynat429 | Coffee Lounge | 82 | Mar 22, 03 09:07 PM |