|
|||||||
| Toilet Bowl Where the shit goes. *flushed* down the drain. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
No man, I sound like I want to hold you accountable to the rules of serious debate. If you want to pretend you are an academic, if you want people to take you seriously, if you want to act like you've got some legitimate point to press (which, clearly you dont - but that's beside the point) then you have to learn how to play like the big kids. That means following the rules of respectable discourse. Which means not cut and pasting shit without aknowledging that you didnt write it. Of course, its pretty obvious you didn't write it, since you dont understand what it means (come back after you've read hegel dude, it will make a difference. He's talking about ideas as the motor of history, not the way governments organize and act). The point is that if you were engaged in a public debate (oh, wait, you are!) or were writing an academic paper (in which you expressed a clearly organanized idea or set of ideas, worked through a coherent logic, and backed it up with aknowledged and respectable sources - not like the majority of reactionary garbage you barf up here) pulling shit like that would get you disqualified faster than you could say 'zionist conspiracy'. Tap out, you're fly-weight. 
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
-ff- i think you're wrong because:
theory divides the psyche into three parts. The first is the ego,which Jung identifies with the conscious mind. Closely related is the personal unconscious, which includes anything which is not presently conscious, but can be. The personal unconscious is like most people's understanding of the unconscious in that it includes both memories that are easily brought to mind and those that have been suppressed for some reason. But it does not include the instincts that Freud would have it include. But then Jung adds the part of the psyche that makes his theory stand out from all others: the collective unconscious. You could call it your "psychic inheritance." It is the reservoir of our experiences as a species, a kind of knowledge we are all born with. And yet we can never be directly conscious of it. It influences all of our experiences and behaviors, most especially the emotional ones, but we only know about it indirectly, by looking at those influences. There are some experiences that show the effects of the collective unconscious more clearly than others: The experiences of love at first sight, of deja vu (the feeling that you've been here before), and the immediate recognition of certain symbols and the meanings of certain myths, could all be understood as the sudden conjunction of our outer reality and the inner reality of the collective unconscious. Grander examples are the creative experiences shared by artists and musicians all over the world and in all times, or the spiritual experiences of mystics of all religions, or the parallels in dreams, fantasies, mythologies, fairy tales, and literature. A nice example that has been greatly discussed recently is the near-death experience. It seems that many people, of many different cultural backgrounds, find that they have very similar recollections when they are brought back from a close encounter with death. They speak of leaving their bodies, seeing their bodies and the events surrounding them clearly, of being pulled through a long tunnel towards a bright light, of seeing deceased relatives or religious figures waiting for them, and of their disappointment at having to leave this happy scene to return to their bodies. Perhaps we are all "built" to experience death in this fashion. and that's why i think you're wrong!
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
you're doomed, you lost, you (insert ANY negative comment here)
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Everyone in this thread pwned him atleast once. haha
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
^^ you lose.
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
No can do my man. Infact, I've decided to make it one of my many personal missions to hound you continuously in every thread you post in. I hope you llike it! (ps, studies have shown that those who most vigorously deny homsexuality are the most likely to be repressing their own homosexual desires. You learn something new every day!)
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Alot of people not only deny, but attack homosexuality from early teen to early twenties... and most of them are far from repressing any homosexual desires, because most of them don't have them. Where were the studies taken? because region can also make a difference, if the studies were done at, say, a univercity of san francisco, chances are it's true... however if the studies were taken in, for example, austin texas... it would be a whole different story..
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
^
Yeah, I was just trying to get his goat. It was mostly a joke. (mostly). (though I think you are wrong on the location bit there anyway - the general belief these days is that homosexuality is genetic/ inherrent, and that around 10% of the population is likely to be gay no matter what region you are in. Personally, I would dispute you further with the assertion that sexuality is much more fluid than most people believe and that virtually everyone has some bisexual element to them, and certainly everyone has the capacity) Last edited by -ff-; Jan 18, 05 at 06:18 PM.
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
well thanks for ruining my thread. I will wash my hands of all this gayness  ps. auto, PM me
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Jan 18, 05
|
|||
|
|||
|
don't quit now, the fun has just begun...
|
