|
|||
Quote:
jesus, i wonder how much crap your gonna write on these three sentences. "why i'm such a pathetic bitch that i have to write a novel of lame insults because someone put me in my place" by fable. |
|
|||
something that just came to my attention, is that you also edit evey post after you've posted it. whats the matter, feel to inferior that you need to revise everything you write?
dude, you're not even on the subject that you originally started anymore. if i were you, i would stop posting in this theard. you have made yourself out to be to much of an idiot that people that would take this thread serously would totally disregard your opinion due to the fact that you change what you say too frequently. you've embarrased yourself enough. stop torturing yourself. it hurts me to see such an igorant person make a complete goof of himself over and over again. |
|
|||
because clearly he must get some self satisfaction out of this...
he's calling on people to instigate anything Quote:
but really, i think he just enjoys talking down to people he thinks are inferior. or lecturing people and giving them advice they didn't ask for. plus he's on here so often that anytime one of his posts gets a reply, he can't resist posting back immediately. very defensive and reactive... leading to low-blow insults, and then later... apologies. gah. i know i'm not alone when i say "enough already." it makes for painfully long and off-topic threads. i know i posted on the second page... but hopefully no one's commented toward anything i wrote cuz i can't be bothered to read through all the belligerence between here and there. i think it's hilarious when he pulls the "contribute to the thread" line on anyone. i'm somewhat reluctant to post this cuz i can feel the reply coming already, but whatever... i know I DON'T HAVE TO REPLY to shit that's not worthwhile. and for the record, fable, i don't mean for this to be a personal attack. my impression is that your threads start with good intentions and i've never met you (i don't think.) i'd just suggest maybe sticking to the music and party discussion on fnk and joining a debate group or online forum more appropriate to your desired response. it's unfortunate that some important issues you bring up on here don't get thoughful and respectful replys, but it's a rave forum and if you can't learn to ignore the garb, you'll continue digging yourself into holes trying to shovel it out of the way. P.L.U.R!!! |
|
|||
Quote:
some things you saw right, but most of them you saw left. but thankyou Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
1) i am well aware that the negetive traits found in male leadership are also shared by females 2) i am well aware that "mothers" are not always "motherly" 3) i am well aware of women in leadership positions through history, however small a number 4) i am well aware that there has been negetive female leadership such as englands relationship with thatcherism and some recently the US relationship with there very own black female robot 5) all of these truths still do not discount or tarnish, or even step up to, the reality that strong female leadership historically (and not just for your brief inconsequential time on earth thus far- but since the earliest days) has played an extremely small part in the happening of out planet --what does this mean for women today in leadership? --what does the current female leadership reality look like? --what is the relevancy and legitemacy of current female leadership? --why would a population of women, when asked about supporting female leadership, share as their first words, that women are just as vindictive and callous as men? --why have the majority of replies in this thread been of men? --why is the idea of supporting a community not just on gender, but on a level of historic oppression that only takes a seat to racial oppression be seen as a negetive? --what are some of the negetive perceptions or voiced disatisfactionary sentiments surrounding political leadership in our country? --why was the immediette response to the thread directed at mainstream political leadership, and not grassroots organization? Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
I just want to be Emperor of Canada. Unfortuently the positon of Ruler is usually always filled :( |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
I did mention some more questions to think about. Perhaps a return to what the thread is about? |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|