|
Mind and Body Ask for advice or offer some. Keep it work safe clean. |
View Poll Results: In marriage, the wife should... | |||
take his name | 18 | 26.47% | |
keep her name | 4 | 5.88% | |
hyphenate | 5 | 7.35% | |
be able to do whichever she wants | 36 | 52.94% | |
other (please explain in thread) | 5 | 7.35% | |
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Topic Tools | Rate Topic |
|
|||
Quote:
It's all about Redundancy, even if some of us die or don't sire children the name lives on. |
|
|||
I think changing your name is somewhat symbolic now a days as opposed to being a sense of property. I would change my name over in most circumstances, my last name doesn't really have any meaning to me because it's my dad, and he didn't raise me, my mom did. I would take my sweetie's name if it came down to it...
If I really hated the last name, I would keep my own or dash it at the end... but the kids would definitely have their father's name. I think that's the way it should be in that case. It's all about personal choice, even though I voted that you should take the man's name, that's just my personal choice |
|
|||
Quote:
I think its more of an issue with the wife and her own blood/birth name more than trying to pass it onto the kids. Although I would appreciate my kids carrying on my near extinct name or just my husband hyphenating... I would prefer my kids to have just one name and let them choose. |
|
|||
I think you would be better of telling your man.. "I always get what I want... so give it up while you can" Kenny, how Scottish is 'Grant'... oh and theres no "d" at the end! |
|
||||
In my tradition, it's customary for the "wife" to keep her last name, and any children would take on the "husband's" last name.
I'm not too sure what I want to do just yet. I think it would be more of a comprised decision for both people in respects to each other and their families. |
|
|||
Quote:
on a side note, from having this discussion with some coworkers the other day and from reading some replies, I think it's really weird people put serious thought into this and start seeing if their name works well with their partner's when some of them are not even close to engaged, or even a year of a serious realtionship. I'm sure if their s/o's found out they were thinking that way they'd probably flip out. Maybe I'm just old fashioned because it's not something I have honestly ever really thought about or seriously considered (obviously my original reply was a joke), I'm sure a looming wedding date would make me think about it, but not much else. |
|
|||
^ I think it's always something to consider. This whole topic can be a huge deal in some relationships, as I'm finding now. I think it's an important topic to discuss before getting engaged - I don't think you shoud promise to marry someone without first discussing your future.
And, for the record, my s/o and I have not been together for a year, we are not engaged, this is an ongoing discussion between us, I told him I was making this post to see some other points of view and, drumroll please - he's NOT freaking out! :P I think it's about where you are in your relationship emotionally and commitment-wise, not the amount of time you have been together for. I was in a previous relationship for nearly 3 years and we never even came close to the point I'm at with my current beau. |
|
|||
Quote:
My reply wasn't referring to you! |
|
|||
^ I know :) I just wanted to point out that sometimes a whole lot of love can happen in a short amount of time. It doesn't mean we're going to run off and get married next week, or even next year, but the fact that we know we're going to get married at some point means that we should be discussing topics like this!
|
|
||||
They're just words. Why so much weight on them? Isn't the emotion behind the people more important than just words? Is a marriage a recitation of bible passages, or a commitment between two people to share their lives, as well as a commitment of the people present to encourage and support the sharing of lives?
That's what marriage is. Not a transference of name or a joining of bank accounts, as much as traditionalists and governments would have you believe. And maybe the fact that everybody puts so much weight on the little minute parts of it like they matter and so little weight on the actual committment is exactly why divorces are so frequent. |
|
|||
^I agree if theres so much fuss about names and simple things like that it overshadows the whole aspect of commitment and love and what marriage is. We never discussed wether or not i would change my last name, Nathan never asked or requested i take his, nor did i ask him if i should. I took his knowing that its what i wanted. If I hadnt it would not have made our marriage any less of one, because its not about names its about love and wanting to share your lives.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
What to add...another Shakespear quote:
"A rose by any other name would smell just as sweet" ....and to that I agree, but I wouldn't want to chance smelling a flower called ass. Names/words do hold power, you don't have to believe in numerology to understand that. If you ask me, whoever the bread bringer is, that name should hold credence, traditionally it's the male, so that's how I see it is as respect towards tradition. In the case of ownership, any debate on this matter means both parties are guilty. This is an ego issue, but I would be guilty of it myself, as I think a good wife should stand by her man. If it's a matter to debate, maybe you should pick the last name that rhymes the least, your kid(s) will thank you later. |